Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

This started as a wishlist and quickly turned into something more.

1.) Please provide feedback!

2.) I'm not too concerned with how competitive this army is, from a tournament standpoint. What I care about is:
-A: Does it function?
-B: Will the controlling player and their opponent have a good time, i.e. it's not so strong it will steamroll the opponent (unlikely, anyway) and it's not so weak it's dead in the water.

Units marked with no change have the same stats/rules/cost as those found in their respective codices (CSM or Daemons).

I haven't gotten around to points yet, which obviously is a huge factor, but I'm getting to it.

Without further delay, here it is:

Codex Heretic Astartes: World Eaters

ABILITIES:

WORLD EATERS WARGEAR LIST:

ARMY LIST:

HQ:

TROOPS:

ELITES:

FAST ATTACK:

HEAVY SUPPORT:

DEDICATED TRANSPORTS:

Chaos Rhino: No changes

FLYERS:

Heldrake: No changes

LORDS OF WAR:

Lord of Skulls: No changes

Angron: Coming soon…

NEW WARGEAR:

Chain greataxe: Range: Melee Type: Melee S:+2 AP:-1 D:1; Make 2 hit rolls for each attack with this weapon, instead of 1.

WARLORD TRAITS:

RELICS OF HATE:

STRATAGEMS:

I feel that the HQs are probably too much.

You can get +1 S and A, then add on rerolling all failed hits and wounds. That's pretty insane.

Slap that on some Zerkers, and you get, from a squad of 5 on the charge:
42 S7 AP-1 D1 attacks
10 S6 AP0 D1 attacks
All hitting on a 3+ rerolling and rerolling wounds.

Against Plaguebearers, one of the toughest blobs in the game, who have a -1 to hit, you whip out...

(Note: All hits are the same against them, since they're D1, S higher than their T but not double, and AP is irrelevant)
34.67 hits
30.81 wounds
20.54 unsaved wounds
13.70 dead

Against what's probably the toughest blob in the game. Compare to pretty much anything else, and it'll be worse.

You have some really flavorful ideas in here!

Agreed with JNA. You went a little too vertical with those HQ options. All those rerolls not only make your regular troops a little too terrifying, but they also make any weapon or other combat boost applied to the characters themselves that much more devastating. As is, you've kind of thrown the kitchen sink at your melee bonuses. I'm probably missing something, but it feels like a lot of those HQ options are kind of redundant. Why so many variations on, "Melee guy who makes other guys better at melee"? Perhaps you could cut that list down and get rid of some of the redundant buffs?

TROOPS
Fanatics' May it Please Khorne rule seems a bit wordy and clunky for what it does. Basically, you want these guys to be a cheap unit that can screen whatever is behind them (rather than just characters), but you don't want to give them tau drone savior protocols because their cheap price tag per body would make it too good, right? Instead of making people figure out whether or not a unit is "obscured," rolling more mortal wounds from MSU enemies than large squads, etc., how about something like the following?

"When an enemy unit targets a friendly unit within 3" of a unit of fanatics containing 5 or more models in the shooting phase, all to-hit rolls against that unit suffer a -1 to hit." It still gives the impression of the fanatics crowding around the guys they're protecting and jumping in front of bullets (I assume that was your intention), but you cut down on the confusion and the side effects. Extra mortal wound generation probably isn't necessary as the low leadership and durability on these guys makes them pretty easy to clear out.

ELITES
Witch Eater feels like it's double-dipping on its extra damage. Raising the damage against psykers is all well and good. The second part feels redundant and also kind of confusing. You inflict a mortal wound (read: 1 extra damage) against a psyker target (which means that you're already upping your averagea and max damage per the first part of the rule), but only after they've already suffered an unsaved wound. The point of a mortal wound is typically to either do extra damage or to get through defenses like good armor and invuln saves. The first part of this rule already does extra damage. So unless you're specifically trying to do a single extra wound to a squad of psykers, why not just make the first part of the rule change the damage to d3 + 1 or just leave it as d3 and then drop the second part of the rule entirely?

Not Today, Witch feels overly complicated to resolve for what basically amounts to, "Make enemy psykers less likely to cast powers." You'd probably be fine just ditching this rule altogether. If you really want to keep it, simplify it to, "Psychic tests made within 24" of a model with this rule suffer a -X penalty." Unless you want the very specific mathematical averages that result from your current wording of the rule, making someone roll a psychic test twice and only applying the modifier on the second roll just seems unnecessarily time-consuming and complicated.

I haven't run the math, but is there ever a situation where Crushing Blow on the gorehammers is mathematically better than just swinging them normally? If not, you can probably just drop the rule for the sake of both simplicity and to avoid laying "traps" for players where they use the sub-optimal attack mode because they haven't crunched the numbers. Also, I don't have any imperial or chaos books laying around at the moment, but how do those gorehammers compare to thunderhammers or power fists? If they're identical and the crushing blow rule is superfluous, you may as well just call them whatever the standard equivalent is.

Daemonic Momentum makes your other options that allow advancing and charging a little redundant. It creates a niche anti-synergy. Which isn't really a problem, but it's something to consider.

FAST ATTACK
Save Guardians seems like a complicated way to do something the core rules already accomplish. If you want to screen a character with these guys, just put them between the character and the enemy. Also, most of the options in the game that let you snipe out characters are kind of sub-optimal. If your opponent has invested heavily enough into sniper rifles to make them matter, then arbitrarily redirecting his attacks feels a little meh. Plus, you run into weird rules interactions when you put "hits" onto a different unit instead of wounds. Also, you already have fanatics to serve as a dedicated screening unit. I vote for ditching this rule entirely.

Chain great axe is slightly confusingly worded. Please clarify whether you basically double your effective attacks when using this weapon or if you just roll twice to hit with each attack (thus making you more likely to hit but not increasing your maximum potential damage.) If the latter, I'd suggest simplifying it to, "A model may reroll failed to hit rolls when attacking with this weapon" as it effectively gives you the same result. If the former.... I worry that this may be way too much in your current rules setup. See above about HQs being too good, and now imagine one of them using the chain greataxe to effectively double his damage output.

WARLORD TRAITS
Number 3 seems brutal and really unpleasant to play against. A d6 has pretty good odds of just one-shotting a librarian for using a power against your warlord. You even have okayish odds of killing a farseer in one go with this. Psychic-reliant armies will arbitrarily lose tons of wounds trying to kill your warlord with psychic powers. Either reduce the wounds considerably (1d3 or even a flat 1) or simply make the warlord untargetable by psychic powers or something. Alternatively, maybe just make this a psychic test penalty or change it to juts allow the warlord to attempt to deny the witch or something. I don't know your local group, but I doubt anyone will find it amusing when they lose a squad of grey knights or a librarian because they had the audacity to try and bypass your 2+/3++ with a psychic power.

Consider limiting number 4 to only affect units with a certain keyword. Otherwise, you have to worry about allied blobs of renegade guard being turned into slightly less effective pre-FAQ fearless conscript type units.

You need to clarify how number 5 works. Units that are within 8" at which point in the game? The start of the game round? The player turn? The movement phase when they advance? The shooting phase when they don't shoot? The charge phase when this is happening? Consider rewording it to, "<Keyword> units within 8" of the warlord during the Charge phase may charge even if they advanced in the Movement phase."

Number 6 makes me raise an eyebrow. It doesn't seem... flat out broken, but 8" compared to 3" is a pretty major increase. Especially on a character with a bunch of buffs that mean almost all of his attacks will turn into wounds against many units. Also, a "Heroic Intervention range" isn't really a thing. We all know what you mean, but you may want to clarify the wording.

RELICS
Helm of Scorn feels too good to me. against a World Eaters army, falling back is going to be a major part of many opponents' game plans. I know that it's frustrating when you're left hanging in the wind to get shot up by your charge target's buddies, but doing d3 damage to everything that doesn't opt to stay in combat and get auto-wiped by your melee-cranked-to-11 World Eaters seems like a feels bad rule. Compared to the dark eldar Helm of Spite that does d3 damage to a single unit once a turn and only after you succesfully deny the witch against that unit specifically with the model bearing the helm, this seems too powerful. Maybe limit the range to 3"? That way, it basically only affects things that your relic-bearer is personally in combat with. I know 8 is Khorne's number, but a greater than 16" diameter of effect is probably pushing it.

I like daemonic warp plate. You'll almost never fall back or whiff with your attacks, so the drawbacks will rarely come up, and that's as it should be. The drawbacks make this flavorful without meaningfully diminishing its usefulness.

Molten Eye. You have a 13.9% chance of rolling an 8 on 2d6. So you'll generate an average of 1 CP for roughly every 8 units that die. Seems reasonable. Scales poorly as you'll likely have way more units in a large game than a small one, but it doesn't seem game breaking. Probably fine.

STRATAGEMS
Wrecking ball sounds fun!

Isn't the Blood Angels version of Furious Charge 3CP? If so, I'd modify this one to match.

Blood Lust cuts off mid-sentence.

Overall, this seems like a solid starting point. Some stuff is more complicated than it has to be, and the stacking HQ buffs seem too good. Tone down the latter, and try to simplify the former and I think you'll be fine. Happy gaming!

Don't forget the Teeth of Khorne, the remnants of the WE heavy support units. They only use HB and AC.