Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I have clear for shooting. But and if they shoot against my Stormhawk? The Stormhawk gives the enemy a - 1 to hit because of "hard to hit". Ok, - 1. And what about Fly? Is it not another - 1?

Fly doesn't give -1 to hit. It would say it does under the rules of it did.

Just having the FLY keyword doesn't give you -1 to hit. Where did you get that idea?

From my matches against Drukhari. Is it right I have - 1 to hit against Reivers, Raiders and Scourges?

I was reading a little bit the Drukhari Codex and only see hart to hit for the venom.

This is the reason.

Alex_85 wrote:
From my matches against Drukhari. Is it right I have - 1 to hit against Reivers, Raiders and Scourges?

I was reading a little bit the Drukhari Codex and only see hart to hit for the venom.

This is the reason.

No, none of those three units have a -1 to hit on their own.

 BaconCatBug wrote:

Alex_85 wrote:
From my matches against Drukhari. Is it right I have - 1 to hit against Reivers, Raiders and Scourges?

I was reading a little bit the Drukhari Codex and only see hart to hit for the venom.

This is the reason.

No, none of those three units have a -1 to hit on their own.

Is it something that gives them - 1 to hit? Because I feel likes an idiot right now. Well, learning more things.