Switch Theme:

Am I mis-remembering an FAQ somewhere regarding GSC Magus and Familiar?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Norn Queen






Did GW ever clarify what happens with GSC Magus when it takes a Familiar? The Familiar doesn't have the CHARACTER keyword, nor does it have a rule like Ammo Runts or Grot Orderlies do giving it the keyword when being shot at, so does taking a Familiar make the whole unit lose CHARACTER protection in the Shooting Phase or not? I swear I could remember they FAQed this, but it's not in the Xenos 2 Index FAQ so I don't know if I am just making things up in my head now.

Edit: Of course, it's in the Designers Commentary. Good work GW on making CRITICAL INFORMATION not even in the proper FAQs.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/08/08 07:28:56


Add me on Discord: BaconCatBug#0294
+++++There are currently ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTEEN (115) documents required to play Warhammer 40,000 8th edition+++++
+++++List of "broken" RaW in Warhammer 40,000 8th edition+++++
Disclaimer: My YMDC answers are from a "What the rules, as written (or modified by Special Snowflake FAQ) in the rulebooks, actually say" perspective, not a "What I wish the rules said" perspective. Even GW agrees with me, send an email to 40kfaq@gwplc.com for a confirmation reply "4. Apply The Rules As Written. If you still don’t have a satisfactory answer, use the rule just as it is written if you possibly can, even if you are not completely happy with the effect the rule has."
Mathhammer tables for 2D6 and 3D6 Charging with various re-roll abilities
Stylus CSS theme for DakkaDakka forums to hide black avatar background and fully hide ignored users.
Userscript to add a button to open all "[First Unread]" links on the page, hides the "[Blog View]" links, and adds a "Subscribed Threads" link to forum pages.  
   
Made in gb
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets





Cardiff

Designers Commentary has always had the same weight as other FAQ documents. It is a proper FAQ to all intents and purposes. Sorry it doesn’t fit your agenda.

 Stormonu wrote:
For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules"
 
   
Made in gb
Dakka Veteran






 JohnnyHell wrote:
Sorry it doesn’t fit your agenda.

That 'putting things in logical places' agenda.
   
Made in gb
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets





Cardiff

 Lord Damocles wrote:
 JohnnyHell wrote:
Sorry it doesn’t fit your agenda.

That 'putting things in logical places' agenda.


The “I decide what counts as valid FAQs and locations” agenda... cf the time he complained anything on WHC wasn’t legit.

 Stormonu wrote:
For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules"
 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





To be fair, BCB isn't saying it isn't legal here, just that (like a lot of us) we wish GW would streamline the FAQs somewhat so that what could be in a main rulebook FAQ isn't scattered acress three or four different FAQs.

It was somebody else on another thread who was trying to not treat the Designer's Commentary as a FAQ when you pointed out something in that addressing the issue.(I had to check to make sure we weren't back in that other thread when I clicked to see new responses and came in with BCB's post not showing on my screen in order to show the new posts).

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/08/09 14:52:31


 
   
Made in us
Clousseau





East Bay, Ca, US

Warhammer community is not a rules source. This is entirely different... the information being split into a bunch of different places, and not represented in the FAQs, makes the ruleset really difficult to understand.

 Galas wrote:
I remember when Marmatag was a nooby, all shiney and full of joy. How playing the unbalanced mess of Warhammer40k in a ultra-competitive meta has changed you

Bharring wrote:
He'll actually *change his mind* in the presence of sufficient/sufficiently defended information. Heretic.
 
   
Made in gb
Norn Queen






The Designers Commentary is listed on the official FAQ site. https://www.warhammer-community.com/faqs/?orderby=title&order=asc#items-warhammer-40000

Add me on Discord: BaconCatBug#0294
+++++There are currently ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTEEN (115) documents required to play Warhammer 40,000 8th edition+++++
+++++List of "broken" RaW in Warhammer 40,000 8th edition+++++
Disclaimer: My YMDC answers are from a "What the rules, as written (or modified by Special Snowflake FAQ) in the rulebooks, actually say" perspective, not a "What I wish the rules said" perspective. Even GW agrees with me, send an email to 40kfaq@gwplc.com for a confirmation reply "4. Apply The Rules As Written. If you still don’t have a satisfactory answer, use the rule just as it is written if you possibly can, even if you are not completely happy with the effect the rule has."
Mathhammer tables for 2D6 and 3D6 Charging with various re-roll abilities
Stylus CSS theme for DakkaDakka forums to hide black avatar background and fully hide ignored users.
Userscript to add a button to open all "[First Unread]" links on the page, hides the "[Blog View]" links, and adds a "Subscribed Threads" link to forum pages.  
   
Made in de
Chalice-Wielding Sanguinary High Priest






Germany

 Marmatag wrote:
Warhammer community is not a rules source.


Yes, it is. Its the official FAQ/errata/rules update place now.
   
Made in us
Second Story Man




Astonished of Heck

 p5freak wrote:
 Marmatag wrote:
Warhammer community is not a rules source.

Yes, it is. Its the official FAQ/errata/rules update place now.

To be precise, it is one of the places where Games Workshop is hosting the errata and FAQ downloads now.

Even more irritating, FAQs and Commentaries do nothing to change a rule, that's what the Erratas do. But I guess actually changing the wording of rule to fit your intent is far more difficult for people to grasp then reading a "How We Play It" FAQ or Commentary.

Are you a Wolf, a Sheep, or a Hound?
Megavolt wrote:They called me crazy…they called me insane…THEY CALLED ME LOONEY!! and boy, were they right.
 
   
Made in gb
Norn Queen






 Charistoph wrote:
 p5freak wrote:
 Marmatag wrote:
Warhammer community is not a rules source.

Yes, it is. Its the official FAQ/errata/rules update place now.

To be precise, it is one of the places where Games Workshop is hosting the errata and FAQ downloads now.

Even more irritating, FAQs and Commentaries do nothing to change a rule, that's what the Erratas do. But I guess actually changing the wording of rule to fit your intent is far more difficult for people to grasp then reading a "How We Play It" FAQ or Commentary.
So then why bother with Errata at all?

Add me on Discord: BaconCatBug#0294
+++++There are currently ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTEEN (115) documents required to play Warhammer 40,000 8th edition+++++
+++++List of "broken" RaW in Warhammer 40,000 8th edition+++++
Disclaimer: My YMDC answers are from a "What the rules, as written (or modified by Special Snowflake FAQ) in the rulebooks, actually say" perspective, not a "What I wish the rules said" perspective. Even GW agrees with me, send an email to 40kfaq@gwplc.com for a confirmation reply "4. Apply The Rules As Written. If you still don’t have a satisfactory answer, use the rule just as it is written if you possibly can, even if you are not completely happy with the effect the rule has."
Mathhammer tables for 2D6 and 3D6 Charging with various re-roll abilities
Stylus CSS theme for DakkaDakka forums to hide black avatar background and fully hide ignored users.
Userscript to add a button to open all "[First Unread]" links on the page, hides the "[Blog View]" links, and adds a "Subscribed Threads" link to forum pages.  
   
Made in de
Chalice-Wielding Sanguinary High Priest






Germany

 Charistoph wrote:

To be precise, it is one of the places where Games Workshop is hosting the errata and FAQ downloads now.


What are the other places ?


Automatically Appended Next Post:
 Charistoph wrote:

Even more irritating, FAQs and Commentaries do nothing to change a rule, that's what the Erratas do. But I guess actually changing the wording of rule to fit your intent is far more difficult for people to grasp then reading a "How We Play It" FAQ or Commentary.


Only irritating to you, if you look at the FAQs page you will see errata written below every graphic, even under designers commentary and stepping into a new edition.....

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2018/08/11 07:09:17


 
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




Errata indicate where a rule will have the wording changed in future printing.
   
Made in de
Chalice-Wielding Sanguinary High Priest






Germany

nosferatu1001 wrote:
Errata indicate where a rule will have the wording changed in future printing.


Not for GW, the designers commentary and stepping into a new edition never existed as print medium. And they probably never will.
   
Made in us
Second Story Man




Astonished of Heck

BaconCatBug wrote:
 Charistoph wrote:
 p5freak wrote:
 Marmatag wrote:
Warhammer community is not a rules source.

Yes, it is. Its the official FAQ/errata/rules update place now.

To be precise, it is one of the places where Games Workshop is hosting the errata and FAQ downloads now.

Even more irritating, FAQs and Commentaries do nothing to change a rule, that's what the Erratas do. But I guess actually changing the wording of rule to fit your intent is far more difficult for people to grasp then reading a "How We Play It" FAQ or Commentary.
So then why bother with Errata at all?

The point is that instead of addressing the issue by changing how a rule is written, GW would just presents an FAQ in which they describe how they feel it could be played and leave the actual rule's wording alone. The Errata was used to fix their own proofreading errors rather than actually alter rules that were unclear.

After having just checked them out, they seemed to have corrected some of this behavior in recent months, thankfully.

p5freak wrote:
 Charistoph wrote:

To be precise, it is one of the places where Games Workshop is hosting the errata and FAQ downloads now.

What are the other places ?

Let's see, they've been posted on the Games Workshop model shop site and the Black Library site at random times without any instruction that they changed where they were posting the new versions. If it has been solely within the Community site for the last 6 months, that is a great step forward in consistent communication for them.

p5freak wrote:
 Charistoph wrote:

Even more irritating, FAQs and Commentaries do nothing to change a rule, that's what the Erratas do. But I guess actually changing the wording of rule to fit your intent is far more difficult for people to grasp then reading a "How We Play It" FAQ or Commentary.

Only irritating to you, if you look at the FAQs page you will see errata written below every graphic, even under designers commentary and stepping into a new edition.....

No, it is not just irritating to me when they do not change the written word, but certain individuals treat it as if the terminology has actually changed. The difference between RAW and RAI is the difference between Errata and FAQ/Commentary.

Are you a Wolf, a Sheep, or a Hound?
Megavolt wrote:They called me crazy…they called me insane…THEY CALLED ME LOONEY!! and boy, were they right.
 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: