Switch Theme:

M'kar is overused?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in sg
Dakka Veteran




Does Matt Ward have a fetish with this guy or something? Because he appears in so many battles against both the Ultramarines and the Grey Knights, some of which widely contradict one another. M'kar battles Kaldor Draigo, Calgar, Memphiston and even Cato Sicarius, only to lose every time. Couldn't GW come up with another Daemon Prince's name instead?

I first learned about M'kar in the novel The Chapter's Due, so I was under the impression M'kar only has quarrel with the Ultramarines because he was a Word Bearer who fought against them on Calth during the Horus Heresy. The Ultramarines bound M'kar on the Indomitable which during or right before the 13th Black Crusade the Iron Warriors under Honsou free him, which makes several events M'kar takes part in impossible unless there are imposters out there.

I for once is glad he is permanently dead, so at least GW won't be bringing him back to get has butt whooped again. But seriously, what is the deal with this guy that made him so popular despite no longer having a model (he has rules back in old editions, if I remember correctly).
   
Made in ca
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion





M'kar was a pure Matt Ward creation as I understand it. the best thing future writers could do is change the deamon who fought dragio to a differant one


Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two 
   
Made in gb
Courageous Space Marine Captain






Glasgow, Scotland

bibotot wrote:
Does Matt Ward have a fetish with this guy or something? Because he appears in so many battles against both the Ultramarines and the Grey Knights, some of which widely contradict one another. M'kar battles Kaldor Draigo, Calgar, Memphiston and even Cato Sicarius, only to lose every time. Couldn't GW come up with another Daemon Prince's name instead?

I first learned about M'kar in the novel The Chapter's Due, so I was under the impression M'kar only has quarrel with the Ultramarines because he was a Word Bearer who fought against them on Calth during the Horus Heresy. The Ultramarines bound M'kar on the Indomitable which during or right before the 13th Black Crusade the Iron Warriors under Honsou free him, which makes several events M'kar takes part in impossible unless there are imposters out there.

I for once is glad he is permanently dead, so at least GW won't be bringing him back to get has butt whooped again. But seriously, what is the deal with this guy that made him so popular despite no longer having a model (he has rules back in old editions, if I remember correctly).



Yes he was a Matt Ward creation and Ward had a massive erection for his own work. Many times when Daemons are concerned,the fluff reuses the same Daemon over and over. Mkar is one example, as being trapped in the Indomitable means he couldnt have approached Mephiston in 965M41, or been on Sondheim V in 997M41. Also this was less than 2 years before his final confrontation with Draigo, so why didnt Draigo go then?

Also, after being banished by Draigo in 999M41, he also attacked Ultramar with Honsou? And was permanently killed by the UMs but didnt break the curse on Draigo.


The issue is that Ward wanted to push him into this role with Draigo hut GW wanted to push this Ultramarine narrative, which is clear when other UM focused novels reveal his origins in the Horus Heresy.


A similarly overused Daemon is Mkachen. Apparently he's some kind of Nemesis to brother captain stern but also gets defeated by Draigo in his warp adventures and many others.



The truth is, GW put themselves in a corner by making Daemon names incredibly complex. Older names like Skarbrand, Fateweaver and Skulltaker are straigtforward. Usbso',!(!-12 is a difficult name to type, repeat and remember. Reusing the one name over and over makes it A) seem like that Daemon is important B) Allows them to skip past the character development of which Daemon did what when and why.


I'm celebrating 8 years on Dakka Dakka!
I started an Instagram! Follow me at Deadshot Miniatures!
DR:90+S++G+++M+B+IPw40k08#-D+++A+++/cwd363R+++T(Ot)DM+
Check out my Deathwatch story, Aftermath in the fiction section!

Credit to Castiel for banner. Thanks Cas!
 
   
Made in ca
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion





I remember once years ago asking where the M'kar mini was simply because for a guy named as much in the codices as he was I thought it seemed strange he lacked one

Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut




Daemon characters being reused makes sense though as it's hard to kill them permanently

CaptainStabby wrote:
If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.

 jy2 wrote:
BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.

 vipoid wrote:
Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?

 MarsNZ wrote:
ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever.
 
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut






UK

Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
Daemon characters being reused makes sense though as it's hard to kill them permanently


From what I can tell, it's less about him being reused at all and more that he's been reused to often and in such short timeframes that other times he's been used stop making sense.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/09/19 22:05:51


Mandorallen turned back toward the insolently sneering baron. 'My Lord,' The great knight said distantly, 'I find thy face apelike and thy form misshapen. Thy beard, moreover, is an offence against decency, resembling more closely the scabrous fur which doth decorate the hinder portion of a mongrel dog than a proper adornment for a human face. Is it possibly that thy mother, seized by some wild lechery, did dally at some time past with a randy goat?' - Mimbrate Knight Protector Mandorallen.

Excerpt from "Seeress of Kell", Book Five of The Malloreon series by David Eddings.

My deviantART Profile - Pay No Attention To The Man Behind The Madness

"You need not fear us, unless you are a dark heart, a vile one who preys on the innocent; I promise, you can’t hide forever in the empty darkness, for we will hunt you down like the animals you are, and pull you into the very bowels of hell." Iron - Within Temptation 
   
Made in gb
Incorporating Wet-Blending




U.k

It’s the warp. He could be two places at once and time doesn’t matter.
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut




 Avatar 720 wrote:
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
Daemon characters being reused makes sense though as it's hard to kill them permanently


From what I can tell, it's less about him being reused at all and more that he's been reused to often and in such short timeframes that other times he's been used stop making sense.

Well he IS a Prince of Undivided so I imagine he likes to go around and get gak done.

Now if he's actually good at that is a different story.

CaptainStabby wrote:
If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.

 jy2 wrote:
BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.

 vipoid wrote:
Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?

 MarsNZ wrote:
ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever.
 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




Demon's presumably lose favor if they don't get things done. M'kar kinda just loses all the time. Though that may be a vicious cycle he can't get out of.
   
Made in gb
Courageous Space Marine Captain






Glasgow, Scotland

Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
 Avatar 720 wrote:
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
Daemon characters being reused makes sense though as it's hard to kill them permanently


From what I can tell, it's less about him being reused at all and more that he's been reused to often and in such short timeframes that other times he's been used stop making sense.

Well he IS a Prince of Undivided so I imagine he likes to go around and get gak done.

Now if he's actually good at that is a different story.


Latest fluff is that Undivided princes are Not and never will be a thing. Belakor is the only Undivided Prince and the gods kept fighting over him like children over a favourite toy. So from then on they only ever raise a Prince in their own power, never shared.

Also, getting gak done only works if he actually gets gak done. Mkar losed every confrontation he's mentioned with his only semi-victory being the cursing of Draigo.

One theory I have is that Tzeentch foresaw the danger of Draigo and decided to keep M'kar active until the curse was placed. One M'kar performed this role, he was useless. Notice how 2 events in 999M41 are Cursing Draigo and then the third invasion of Ultramar, where he is killed off for good.


The main issue though isnt that he is everywhere, its that the timeline doesnt make sense. The background for his third attack on Ultramar alongside Honsou reveals that Calgar didnt kill him in the 2nd Invasion, but trapped his essence in the warp core of the ship, and that he is still trapped there when they go to the ship. This makes it completely impossible for him to be involved in any other event including Sondheim V, Acralem, etc.

I'm celebrating 8 years on Dakka Dakka!
I started an Instagram! Follow me at Deadshot Miniatures!
DR:90+S++G+++M+B+IPw40k08#-D+++A+++/cwd363R+++T(Ot)DM+
Check out my Deathwatch story, Aftermath in the fiction section!

Credit to Castiel for banner. Thanks Cas!
 
   
Made in gb
Frenzied Berserker Terminator






 Deadshot wrote:
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
 Avatar 720 wrote:
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
Daemon characters being reused makes sense though as it's hard to kill them permanently


From what I can tell, it's less about him being reused at all and more that he's been reused to often and in such short timeframes that other times he's been used stop making sense.

Well he IS a Prince of Undivided so I imagine he likes to go around and get gak done.

Now if he's actually good at that is a different story.


Latest fluff is that Undivided princes are Not and never will be a thing. Belakor is the only Undivided Prince and the gods kept fighting over him like children over a favourite toy. So from then on they only ever raise a Prince in their own power, never shared.

Also, getting gak done only works if he actually gets gak done. Mkar losed every confrontation he's mentioned with his only semi-victory being the cursing of Draigo.

One theory I have is that Tzeentch foresaw the danger of Draigo and decided to keep M'kar active until the curse was placed. One M'kar performed this role, he was useless. Notice how 2 events in 999M41 are Cursing Draigo and then the third invasion of Ultramar, where he is killed off for good.


The main issue though isnt that he is everywhere, its that the timeline doesnt make sense. The background for his third attack on Ultramar alongside Honsou reveals that Calgar didnt kill him in the 2nd Invasion, but trapped his essence in the warp core of the ship, and that he is still trapped there when they go to the ship. This makes it completely impossible for him to be involved in any other event including Sondheim V, Acralem, etc.


Can you quote or give the source of the latest fluff?
   
Made in gb
Courageous Space Marine Captain






Glasgow, Scotland

 Delvarus Centurion wrote:
 Deadshot wrote:
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
 Avatar 720 wrote:
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
Daemon characters being reused makes sense though as it's hard to kill them permanently


From what I can tell, it's less about him being reused at all and more that he's been reused to often and in such short timeframes that other times he's been used stop making sense.

Well he IS a Prince of Undivided so I imagine he likes to go around and get gak done.

Now if he's actually good at that is a different story.


Latest fluff is that Undivided princes are Not and never will be a thing. Belakor is the only Undivided Prince and the gods kept fighting over him like children over a favourite toy. So from then on they only ever raise a Prince in their own power, never shared.

Also, getting gak done only works if he actually gets gak done. Mkar losed every confrontation he's mentioned with his only semi-victory being the cursing of Draigo.

One theory I have is that Tzeentch foresaw the danger of Draigo and decided to keep M'kar active until the curse was placed. One M'kar performed this role, he was useless. Notice how 2 events in 999M41 are Cursing Draigo and then the third invasion of Ultramar, where he is killed off for good.


The main issue though isnt that he is everywhere, its that the timeline doesnt make sense. The background for his third attack on Ultramar alongside Honsou reveals that Calgar didnt kill him in the 2nd Invasion, but trapped his essence in the warp core of the ship, and that he is still trapped there when they go to the ship. This makes it completely impossible for him to be involved in any other event including Sondheim V, Acralem, etc.


Can you quote or give the source of the latest fluff?


Which fluff do you refer to?

The DP undivided stuff comes from Belakor's entry in the lastest Daemons codex (or possibly CSM cant remember which). I also believe its on his Lexicanum page.

M'kars background in my last paragraph can be found on his Lexicanum page with sources. I'm currently operating on limited internet and battery life so this is as much as I can provided this moment

I'm celebrating 8 years on Dakka Dakka!
I started an Instagram! Follow me at Deadshot Miniatures!
DR:90+S++G+++M+B+IPw40k08#-D+++A+++/cwd363R+++T(Ot)DM+
Check out my Deathwatch story, Aftermath in the fiction section!

Credit to Castiel for banner. Thanks Cas!
 
   
Made in gb
Frenzied Berserker Terminator






 Deadshot wrote:
 Delvarus Centurion wrote:
 Deadshot wrote:
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
 Avatar 720 wrote:
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
Daemon characters being reused makes sense though as it's hard to kill them permanently


From what I can tell, it's less about him being reused at all and more that he's been reused to often and in such short timeframes that other times he's been used stop making sense.

Well he IS a Prince of Undivided so I imagine he likes to go around and get gak done.

Now if he's actually good at that is a different story.


Latest fluff is that Undivided princes are Not and never will be a thing. Belakor is the only Undivided Prince and the gods kept fighting over him like children over a favourite toy. So from then on they only ever raise a Prince in their own power, never shared.

Also, getting gak done only works if he actually gets gak done. Mkar losed every confrontation he's mentioned with his only semi-victory being the cursing of Draigo.

One theory I have is that Tzeentch foresaw the danger of Draigo and decided to keep M'kar active until the curse was placed. One M'kar performed this role, he was useless. Notice how 2 events in 999M41 are Cursing Draigo and then the third invasion of Ultramar, where he is killed off for good.


The main issue though isnt that he is everywhere, its that the timeline doesnt make sense. The background for his third attack on Ultramar alongside Honsou reveals that Calgar didnt kill him in the 2nd Invasion, but trapped his essence in the warp core of the ship, and that he is still trapped there when they go to the ship. This makes it completely impossible for him to be involved in any other event including Sondheim V, Acralem, etc.


Can you quote or give the source of the latest fluff?


Which fluff do you refer to?

The DP undivided stuff comes from Belakor's entry in the lastest Daemons codex (or possibly CSM cant remember which). I also believe its on his Lexicanum page.

M'kars background in my last paragraph can be found on his Lexicanum page with sources. I'm currently operating on limited internet and battery life so this is as much as I can provided this moment


"Latest fluff is that Undivided princes are Not and never will be a thing. " Just on this, I'd like to read it.
   
Made in us
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord






 Delvarus Centurion wrote:


"Latest fluff is that Undivided princes are Not and never will be a thing. " Just on this, I'd like to read it.


Well, instead of creating aerial views of ziggurats on threads open up you Daemon codex and read Be'lakor's entry or look him up on one of the many Wikis.


Games Workshop Delenda Est.

Users on ignore- 53.

If you break apart my or anyone else's posts line by line I will not read them. 
   
Made in gb
Frenzied Berserker Terminator






 Grimtuff wrote:
 Delvarus Centurion wrote:


"Latest fluff is that Undivided princes are Not and never will be a thing. " Just on this, I'd like to read it.


Well, instead of creating aerial views of ziggurats on threads open up you Daemon codex and read Be'lakor's entry or look him up on one of the many Wikis.


And how exactly am I to know where to look, it could have been in a novel as well. Would you stop following me around like a bad spell. We had an argument and exchanged insults, get over it.
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut






UK

 Delvarus Centurion wrote:
 Grimtuff wrote:
 Delvarus Centurion wrote:


"Latest fluff is that Undivided princes are Not and never will be a thing. " Just on this, I'd like to read it.


Well, instead of creating aerial views of ziggurats on threads open up you Daemon codex and read Be'lakor's entry or look him up on one of the many Wikis.


And how exactly am I to know where to look, it could have been in a novel as well. Would you stop following me around like a bad spell. We had an argument and exchanged insults, get over it.


You've been given pretty exact notes on where to look in the very post you quoted and others, namely the Daemons codex and various wiki entries for Be'lakor.

As for Grim, they're allowed to use the forum just as much as you are, and nothing in the post was hostile or even close to it. From where I'm sat, it's certainly not Grim who needs to get over something.

Mandorallen turned back toward the insolently sneering baron. 'My Lord,' The great knight said distantly, 'I find thy face apelike and thy form misshapen. Thy beard, moreover, is an offence against decency, resembling more closely the scabrous fur which doth decorate the hinder portion of a mongrel dog than a proper adornment for a human face. Is it possibly that thy mother, seized by some wild lechery, did dally at some time past with a randy goat?' - Mimbrate Knight Protector Mandorallen.

Excerpt from "Seeress of Kell", Book Five of The Malloreon series by David Eddings.

My deviantART Profile - Pay No Attention To The Man Behind The Madness

"You need not fear us, unless you are a dark heart, a vile one who preys on the innocent; I promise, you can’t hide forever in the empty darkness, for we will hunt you down like the animals you are, and pull you into the very bowels of hell." Iron - Within Temptation 
   
Made in gb
Frenzied Berserker Terminator






 Avatar 720 wrote:
 Delvarus Centurion wrote:
 Grimtuff wrote:
 Delvarus Centurion wrote:


"Latest fluff is that Undivided princes are Not and never will be a thing. " Just on this, I'd like to read it.


Well, instead of creating aerial views of ziggurats on threads open up you Daemon codex and read Be'lakor's entry or look him up on one of the many Wikis.


And how exactly am I to know where to look, it could have been in a novel as well. Would you stop following me around like a bad spell. We had an argument and exchanged insults, get over it.


You've been given pretty exact notes on where to look in the very post you quoted and others, namely the Daemons codex and various wiki entries for Be'lakor.

As for Grim, they're allowed to use the forum just as much as you are, and nothing in the post was hostile or even close to it. From where I'm sat, it's certainly not Grim who needs to get over something.


I only read the which part thing. Didn't read the rest. It was from another thread, why else would I say 'following me'. Yeah they can use the forum, but not follow me around on every thread I post in to argue with me. He hasn't even commented on this thread, but the only thing he's commented on is in reply to my comment, same with other threads, I mean come on.

This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2018/09/22 15:39:12


 
   
Made in us
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord






"Every breath you take
Every move you make
Every bond you break
Every step you take
I'll be watching you"



Dude, we've given you the relevant places of where to look. The ball is in your court. If you don't know what the 40k wikis are and how to find them then maybe you should not be so rude to other users.


Games Workshop Delenda Est.

Users on ignore- 53.

If you break apart my or anyone else's posts line by line I will not read them. 
   
Made in gb
Frenzied Berserker Terminator






 Grimtuff wrote:
"Every breath you take
Every move you make
Every bond you break
Every step you take
I'll be watching you"



Dude, we've given you the relevant places of where to look. The ball is in your court. If you don't know what the 40k wikis are and how to find them then maybe you should not be so rude to other users.


Not be rude to other users, Jesus you have some balls saying that. Every comment I see you having with people you make sarcastic asshat replies. Seriously stop replying to my comments.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2018/09/22 15:50:05


 
   
Made in us
[DCM]
Dankhold Troggoth






Shadeglass Maze

Temp lock till a mod has time to tackle this...
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Background
Go to: