Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

If i have Endless fury and use Saturation bombardment what happens on hit rolls of 6?

Since both rules do the same thing, it looks like you score 2 hits instead of 1.

So rolling a single 6 would be 2 hits.

It depends on how you interpret FAQS. There is an faq that says you can do things "instead" of something that is not possible to do. Therefore it comes down to whether or not you can get two hits "instead" of the original one multiple times. My opinion from RaW and English however is that they are both replacing the same thing, which means the second instance doesn't actually do anything because there is nothing left to replace. If it were to stack the rule would have to say "an additional attack".

 BaconCatBug wrote:
It depends on how you interpret FAQS. There is an faq that says you can do things "instead" of something that is not possible to do. Therefore it comes down to whether or not you can get two hits "instead" of the original one multiple times. My opinion from RaW and English however is that they are both replacing the same thing, which means the second instance doesn't actually do anything because there is nothing left to replace. If it were to stack the rule would have to say "an additional attack".

The Rules Lawyer in me agrees that it would seem to be intentionally written to avoid stacking on. The Stragem allows all the Weapons on any Knight to have the same ability as the Relic for a turn, but wouldn't have any effect on Endless Fury itself.

This was already addressed in itc. Each roll of 6 triggers for each ability, but only modifies the original roll. So each 6 becomes 3 hits, not 4.

 quickfuze wrote:
This was already addressed in itc. Each roll of 6 triggers for each ability, but only modifies the original roll. So each 6 becomes 3 hits, not 4.

The more I read about ITC, the gakkier their rules sound...

So the answer is ymmv. Clarify with your opponent beforehand.

 quickfuze wrote:
This was already addressed in itc. Each roll of 6 triggers for each ability, but only modifies the original roll. So each 6 becomes 3 hits, not 4.

ITC created a houserule, as Tournaments sometimes do.

That has no bearing on the RAW though.

 DeathReaper wrote:

 quickfuze wrote:
This was already addressed in itc. Each roll of 6 triggers for each ability, but only modifies the original roll. So each 6 becomes 3 hits, not 4.

ITC created a houserule, as Tournaments sometimes do.

That has no bearing on the RAW though.

Agreed. As I read it both do the exact same thing, so no stacking. It doesn’t say +1, so ITC did a dumb.


Automatically Appended Next Post:

 BaconCatBug wrote:
It depends on how you interpret FAQS. There is an faq that says you can do things "instead" of something that is not possible to do. Therefore it comes down to whether or not you can get two hits "instead" of the original one multiple times. My opinion from RaW and English however is that they are both replacing the same thing, which means the second instance doesn't actually do anything because there is nothing left to replace. If it were to stack the rule would have to say "an additional attack".

Yeah that first bit would be tenuous stretching of the highest order, not one I’d subscribe to. I agree with your actual thoughts on the matter though.