Switch Theme:

Are you happy with more rules in more books?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Poll
Are you happy with an expansion with new rules?
Hell, yeah!
For one of my factions yes, the other no.
meh
not really but I'll live.
DAMN YOU GW!!!!!!!!!!!

View results
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Battlefortress Driver with Krusha Wheel






So we have two new books coming out at exactly the same time. CA, again, and this Vigilus campaign book. Now, if what people from the Vigilus weekend are to be believe, we know everything in the book can be used for any matched play game of 40k. Therefore, for what has been spoiled for Orks so far (some cool fluffy stuff (nothing game breaking but looks fun) and an awesome looking relic) I can't help but feel a little sour about all this... The book comes out basically a month after our codex comes out with a ton of stuff that I would have loved to have been in the base book. However, my marines came out over a year ago so any update at all for them is gladly welcomed. Plus, new campaign is always welcomed. So... I'm a little hit and miss about Vigilus.

Then, we have CA and I'll tell you... any update to the game at all (outside of new campaigns and missions) I feel extremely sour for paying for (I always did it begrudgingly before but with the modern day world having multiple table top companies doing it for free I just can't stand it anymore).

Again, I'm particular sour because i just forked out for the Ork codex and the new vehicles so I won't be getting the books as it's beyond my budget for this year. However, I know this isn't the case for everyone who haven't had an update in years... Nevertheless, I'm also getting more worried about the amount of books we might need to lug around (I love printed books and can't stick digital all that well). If I want to use all the resources available to Orks and be up to date on the rules I'll be carrying about 5 books minimum (not including FW books and the last CA).

So what are we all thinking, have our minds changed from last year or are we happy with both the two new books coming out?

My opinions clearly: I like the Vigilus book as expansions are always welcome but wish a few of the Ork rules were in the codex that only came out a few weeks ago. CA, I like the new missions, beta codex and narrative rules but hate the idea of paying for updates... I should have the option to buy the book or get a free pdf with all the points changes and base game rule changes... Right now GW's promise of free rules (which they clearly stated at the start of 8th edition) is out the window as the changes in CA invalidate the free pdf they handed out. XD
   
Made in au
[MOD]
Making Stuff






Under the couch

Yes, and no. Campaign books are an awesome thing, and something I've been saying for years that GW should do more of. But rules in campaign books should be for that campaign, not for regular play, so people only need to buy them if they actually want to play that campaign.

 
   
Made in gb
Mekboy on Kustom Deth Kopta






I’ll be getting Vigilus but after falling for CA last year I won’t make the same mistake again. I’m not paying for a beta codex I have no interest in and points adjustments that should be free.
   
Made in us
Aspirant Tech-Adept






only if those rules are optional and not needed for the core game system.

"I learned the hard way that if you take a stand on any issue, no matter how insignificant, people will line up around the block to kick your ass over it." Jesse "the mind" Ventura. 
   
Made in ie
Executing Exarch





London, UK

I really like CA, it's a necessary yearly update that fixes issues that "the expert play testers" miss out on in their extensive and rigorous testing. Personally, I'd prefer it if they gave us a PDF with the barebones updates but people would complain about that too because it wouldn't have enough pictures. It's a necessary book and it's something GW have needed to do for years.

As for Vigilus, I dislike the fact that they've made a campaign book that has matched play rules that will be picked up in tournament play, meaning another book has to be brought on top of the rulebook/codex/CA/FAQ.

Campaign books should be reserved for narrative and open play rule sets along with their specific stratagems and keep matched play rules to CA.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/12/03 23:39:22


   
Made in us
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor






Gathering the Informations.

 insaniak wrote:
Yes, and no. Campaign books are an awesome thing, and something I've been saying for years that GW should do more of. But rules in campaign books should be for that campaign, not for regular play, so people only need to buy them if they actually want to play that campaign.

Sorry Insaniak, but I have to disagree with you a bit on this.

I'd rather the campaigns introduce new stuff into the game for a permanent basis. It helps add some variety to things while also allowing for the campaigns themselves to serve as a structure for those who want to use them.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/12/03 23:41:06


 
   
Made in gb
Battlefortress Driver with Krusha Wheel






 Kanluwen wrote:
 insaniak wrote:
Yes, and no. Campaign books are an awesome thing, and something I've been saying for years that GW should do more of. But rules in campaign books should be for that campaign, not for regular play, so people only need to buy them if they actually want to play that campaign.

Sorry Insaniak, but I have to disagree with you a bit on this.

I'd rather the campaigns introduce new stuff into the game for a permanent basis. It helps add some variety to things while also allowing for the campaigns themselves to serve as a structure for those who want to use them.


But I dislike how a weak unit in my codex can now be buffed by a book that has come out 4 weeks after the sed codex with the weak unit. (firstly, I know what I'm about to say isn't really the case but it's what it seems like) I can't help but feel units didn't get the buffs they were meant to have in my codex in hopes I'd buy this book to buff them.... this is exactly what game companies do with micro-transactions (Ie, make a gun weak but then charge you for an expansion that comes with stuff that buffs the guns).

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/12/03 23:50:45


 
   
Made in au
Pestilent Plague Marine with Blight Grenade





 An Actual Englishman wrote:
I’ll be getting Vigilus but after falling for CA last year I won’t make the same mistake again. I’m not paying for a beta codex I have no interest in and points adjustments that should be free.


Within a few days of the CA release there will be plenty of sites that have a summary of all the relevant point changes for your faction.


"Courage and Honour. I hear you murmur these words in the mist, in their wake I hear your hearts beat harder with false conviction seeking to convince yourselves that a brave death has meaning.
There is no courage to be found here my nephews, no honour to be had. Your souls will join the trillion others in the mist shrieking uselessly to eternity, weeping for the empire you could not save.

To the unfaithful, I bring holy plagues ripe with enlightenment. To the devout, I bring the blessing of immortality through the kiss of sacred rot.
And to you, new-born sons of Gulliman, to you flesh crafted puppets of a failing Imperium I bring the holiest gift of all.... Silence."
- Mortarion, The Death Lord, The Reaper of Men, Daemon Primarch of Nurgle


5300 | 2800 | 3600 | 1600 |  
   
Made in us
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator




I am very happy with an annual Chapter Approved book, yes.
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut




Once you actually get to the rules in the 8th edition moster of a book GW has really no excuse for not just having an up to date copy of just the game rules and points in CA.

Instead of a 2 year old book with FAQ's and erratas that render it close to useless anyway, you just pick up the highest issue of CA and this years FAQ's and done much simpler than the current system.

The vigilous book I'm.much less sold on, certain factions getting bonus rules while other factions get nothing grates a tad, while the book 1 formations look not ti bad, we haven't seen them stacked with the CA changes yet hopefully they aren't realy that great more nice to have than must use for competitive settings.

But it's still got me the oh GoD GW why feeling stirring, hopefully book 2 and 3 are just as tame but this is GW we are talking about.
   
Made in us
Jinking Ravenwing Land Speeder Pilot




Hanoi, Vietnam.

I'm largely indifferent. For my own purposes, the only necessary books are the Rule Book, (for Battle Forged armies and terrain rules) and the Codex. As far as I'm concerned, everything else is an optional extra. If for some reason, my gaming group insists on using the new points adjustments, I have no problem chipping in a little to purchase a club copy, and if for some reason, even that feels like a cost I'm unwilling to pay, I have no real moral objection against committing a few copyright violations.
   
Made in au
[MOD]
Making Stuff






Under the couch

 Kanluwen wrote:

I'd rather the campaigns introduce new stuff into the game for a permanent basis. It helps add some variety to things while also allowing for the campaigns themselves to serve as a structure for those who want to use them.

Isn't adding variety to things what the campaign is for?

The core rules should be exactly that, and should be contained in the rulebook, not spread across multiple publications.

 
   
Made in it
Waaagh! Ork Warboss




Italy

No, but having a more balanced game is better than condensing all the rules in a single book and playing a messed up game.

 
   
Made in fi
Locked in the Tower of Amareo





Too bad GW isn't aiming for balanced game so that argument loses water. We get both unbalanced game where GW does marketing changes all the time and have to buy new books.

2024 painted/bought: 109/109 
   
Made in us
Jinking Ravenwing Land Speeder Pilot




Hanoi, Vietnam.

tneva82 wrote:
Too bad GW isn't aiming for balanced game so that argument loses water. We get both unbalanced game where GW does marketing changes all the time and have to buy new books.

I think the main point of Chapter Approved is to aim for a more balanced game, at least in match play. I agree that it would be a lot more admirable if they produced the fruits of that labour free of charge, but for a company that's had an almost sea change in the last couple of years, I think even this effort is laudable. Remember when Games-Workshop didn't even bother with FAQs?
   
Made in it
Waaagh! Ork Warboss




Italy

tneva82 wrote:
Too bad GW isn't aiming for balanced game so that argument loses water. We get both unbalanced game where GW does marketing changes all the time and have to buy new books.


A 100% balanced game? No, but the 100000000 FAQs and CA surely contributed to have a more balanced game. There's no need of buying CA, just make a photocopy of the things you need if you want it just for a few rules or points changes.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/12/04 09:03:49


 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka




NE Ohio, USA

Depends. What are these new rules?
Will they aid one of my armies? +
Will they hinder one of my armies in some way? -
Will they fix any of the truly horrendous core rules (or lack there of) that I found upon returning to 8th? +
Will they hinder one of my opponents MORE than they hinder me? +
   
Made in gb
Battlefortress Driver with Krusha Wheel






If GW cared about balance the codex would all be digital and recive a monthly update. XD
   
Made in pl
Fixture of Dakka




Extra stuff, that may help people with burn out or that adds some new build to an existing army is cool, specialy if it is not obligatory.

Being forced to buy a CA every year, is like paying for a patch update.

If you have to kill, then kill in the best manner. If you slaughter, then slaughter in the best manner. Let one of you sharpen his knife so his animal feels no pain. 
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




Texas

In a perfect world, we would at most NEED 2 books....

1 BRB.
1 Codex for your chosen faction

Books like an index, CA, and Generals Handbook need to be $15-$20 max. I'm already spending about $100 for just the BRB and Codex. Prices need to come down for all the supplements. Campaign books feel about right given what I am seeing, but it makes it a bit difficult when they have new rules that would be used outside of that campaign.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/12/04 14:06:12


No Pity! No Remorse! No fear! 
   
Made in us
Enigmatic Chaos Sorcerer




Tampa, FL

I think it depends. I like the concept that they can print updated sheets in a different book without having to reprint an entire Codex; this would be acceptable I think since the campaign book is sort of an update to certain factions. However the way they seem to be doing it is the opposite and simply adding more bloat.

- Wayne
Formerly WayneTheGame 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




Here is a radical idea. I think the chapter approved should have the core rules in it each year. They are only a few pages, but updated with all the new changes.

So the new CA would have the rules, but updated with the new patch rules like Rule of three, and single faction detachment, and character targeting.
   
Made in gb
Mekboy on Kustom Deth Kopta






 NurglesR0T wrote:
 An Actual Englishman wrote:
I’ll be getting Vigilus but after falling for CA last year I won’t make the same mistake again. I’m not paying for a beta codex I have no interest in and points adjustments that should be free.


Within a few days of the CA release there will be plenty of sites that have a summary of all the relevant point changes for your faction.


Exactly. This is why I won’t be purchasing this year. If there was content in the book I actually wanted I’d buy regardless. Last years CA was a waste really. Objective markers don’t exactly excite me and all the rules were available elsewhere for free.
   
Made in us
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps






As someone who hasn't played since 5th edition, the rules spread across multiple books is extremely confusing, and I just hope and pray that Battle Scribe is up to date on their points costs.
   
Made in us
Preacher of the Emperor





St. Louis, Missouri USA

Why are people losing their minds over the cost of CA? It's a drop in the bucket for this hobby.

 
   
Made in us
Powerful Phoenix Lord





My main issue with people complaining about Chapter Approved...is that you don't need to own it. Saying so is being disingenous. Our local group (10-12 players) owns...two copies of CA? All you need is to snap a pic or jot some notes of the point changes. And it's 2018, you can absolutely find that information online.

You'll also note the one or two major rule changes, etc. But other than that it's a completely optional purchase. It contains "additional" content you can absolutely skip. Should GW post the points changes online for free? Sure. I think so, but I think people are all but lying when they state that they "have to" purchase Chapter Approved. No. You don't.

So, in answer to your main question - extra rules are always cool, as long as they'e optional/additional etc.
   
Made in ca
Been Around the Block




 lolman1c wrote:
If GW cared about balance the codex would all be digital and recive a monthly update. XD


I'm not sure if your joking, but this would be terrible. Monthly updates are exactly what I want GW to avoid... Because often things that are considered broken are just a new build that people need to learn how to deal with. You need to let things settle for a bit before acting otherwise you risk breaking the game further.


On the OPs topic, I do see why people are upset about chapter approved when most other game companies are going to free rules... I mean I also play infinity and they have an official army builder with all the rules and points... and each rule referenced on a sheet is hyperlinked to a wiki with the full rule... It's just so convenient. I'm not saying GW needs to go to the free rules route, but if a tiny little company like Corvus Bellis can do that, GW should have no issue providing that, even if they decide to lock it behind a paywall.

All that being said, I think the only issue I have, is I wish they would release just the point changes and new matched play rules in a small pdf with all the fluff stripped out of it, and charge a minimal fee if they want. Which would be good for people who just want the matched play rules. (note I'm more of a filthy narrative player so I would likely grab the full book, but i think a cheaper option for people who only care about the crunch should be available)
   
Made in gb
Battlefortress Driver with Krusha Wheel






Flamephoenix182 wrote:
 lolman1c wrote:
If GW cared about balance the codex would all be digital and recive a monthly update. XD


I'm not sure if your joking, but this would be terrible. Monthly updates are exactly what I want GW to avoid... Because often things that are considered broken are just a new build that people need to learn how to deal with. You need to let things settle for a bit before acting otherwise you risk breaking the game further.


On the OPs topic, I do see why people are upset about chapter approved when most other game companies are going to free rules... I mean I also play infinity and they have an official army builder with all the rules and points... and each rule referenced on a sheet is hyperlinked to a wiki with the full rule... It's just so convenient. I'm not saying GW needs to go to the free rules route, but if a tiny little company like Corvus Bellis can do that, GW should have no issue providing that, even if they decide to lock it behind a paywall.

All that being said, I think the only issue I have, is I wish they would release just the point changes and new matched play rules in a small pdf with all the fluff stripped out of it, and charge a minimal fee if they want. Which would be good for people who just want the matched play rules. (note I'm more of a filthy narrative player so I would likely grab the full book, but i think a cheaper option for people who only care about the crunch should be available)


It's not broken if they actually had a group of unbiased testers. I mean I saw people claiming Orks were way too OP and needed huge nerfs the first day the codex came out... but hopefully GW would ignore them and the people who actually wrote the rules would not just listen blindly to what every they're being told.
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




In a word, No. I probably enjoyed 7th more than most but by the end, the number of books you needed for most armies was annoying. We are slowly getting back to that if not more so. To have the full rules for my main army, space marines, I need a codex, an index, the FW index, CA (CA 2.0 soon), FAQs and the BRB and soon campaign supplements. That's a lot of sources just to play the game.
   
Made in us
Powerful Ushbati





United States

 lolman1c wrote:
So we have two new books coming out at exactly the same time. CA, again, and this Vigilus campaign book. Now, if what people from the Vigilus weekend are to be believe, we know everything in the book can be used for any matched play game of 40k. Therefore, for what has been spoiled for Orks so far (some cool fluffy stuff (nothing game breaking but looks fun) and an awesome looking relic) I can't help but feel a little sour about all this... The book comes out basically a month after our codex comes out with a ton of stuff that I would have loved to have been in the base book. However, my marines came out over a year ago so any update at all for them is gladly welcomed. Plus, new campaign is always welcomed. So... I'm a little hit and miss about Vigilus.

Then, we have CA and I'll tell you... any update to the game at all (outside of new campaigns and missions) I feel extremely sour for paying for (I always did it begrudgingly before but with the modern day world having multiple table top companies doing it for free I just can't stand it anymore).

Again, I'm particular sour because i just forked out for the Ork codex and the new vehicles so I won't be getting the books as it's beyond my budget for this year. However, I know this isn't the case for everyone who haven't had an update in years... Nevertheless, I'm also getting more worried about the amount of books we might need to lug around (I love printed books and can't stick digital all that well). If I want to use all the resources available to Orks and be up to date on the rules I'll be carrying about 5 books minimum (not including FW books and the last CA).

So what are we all thinking, have our minds changed from last year or are we happy with both the two new books coming out?

My opinions clearly: I like the Vigilus book as expansions are always welcome but wish a few of the Ork rules were in the codex that only came out a few weeks ago. CA, I like the new missions, beta codex and narrative rules but hate the idea of paying for updates... I should have the option to buy the book or get a free pdf with all the points changes and base game rule changes... Right now GW's promise of free rules (which they clearly stated at the start of 8th edition) is out the window as the changes in CA invalidate the free pdf they handed out. XD


It's almost as if people forget Kinko's exists and that you don't really ever need to carry around any books if you use Battlescribe and some hard copies in a binder...
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: