Switch Theme:

Thoughts on MK X space marine power armor.  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Poll
Do you like the new MK X power armor?
Yes
No
Don't care
Its ok.

View results
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in jp
Bush? No, Eldar Ranger





Mihara, Japan

Well personally cool helmet (compared to 7th/8th aside, those flared knee pads are fugly, what's your thoughts?

The only thing better than a good nights sleep, is two good nights sleep. 
   
Made in gb
Frenzied Berserker Terminator






I like it but I'm pissed that it looks like its going to replace terminator armour since Calgar is now in it.
   
Made in us
Powerful Phoenix Lord





Completely ambivalent. Enjoy the look of the new Aggressors but their stats are woeful compared to how the models look. Reivers look like poop.
   
Made in us
Fiery Bright Wizard





California

I like it but prefer the more vaderesque brutal look of the regular tactical marine helmets. The mk x is more maximus inspired. I just wish there was more variety in the armor pattern the lack of studs and parchments and idk its just too modern and slick. Right now its just slightly bland but maybe they can flesh it out more over the years.

 
   
Made in us
Inspiring SDF-1 Bridge Officer





Mississippi

I like the Mark X armor, but it also looks good with a beaky helmeted heads too.

I also like Gravis armor better than the looks of hunchbacked terminators.

It never ends well 
   
Made in us
Imperial Agent Provocateur




Overall nice, if bland so far. I’ve replaced a lot of the heads with Mk7s and beakies to help add variety.
Aggressors are cool. Inceptors are ok, though I like them better hoodless.

Reivers look goofy with the strange leg armor and dollar store halloween masks.
   
Made in us
Krazed Killa Kan






Mark X uses the good looking MK4 helmet but i hate the mid drift / ab look of the chest piece and the flared bits on the knee pads.

"Hold my shoota, I'm goin in"
Armies (7th edition points)
7000+ Points Death Skullz
4000 Points
+ + 3000 Points "The Fiery Heart of the Emperor"
3500 Points "Void Kraken" Space Marines
3000 Points "Bard's Booze Cruise" 
   
Made in us
Ancient Venerable Dark Angels Dreadnought





I like it. The MK IV helmet is leagues superior to the silly angry-faced MK VII helm which was always a mistep. My only wish is that they made the MK VI helmet standard on MK X instead of MK IV. MK IV looks alright, but MK VI is the single most original power armor design GW ever came up with. Hounskull power armor is not only a really smart design in-universe, looks sleek, but also stands out from other fictional power armor.

 Stormonu wrote:
but it also looks good with a beaky helmeted heads too.


Hallelujah!

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/12/05 09:32:18


“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.”
 
   
Made in us
Jinking Ravenwing Land Speeder Pilot




Hanoi, Vietnam.

Intercessors and Aggressors are marked improvements on Tacticals and Terminators.

Reivers are still wearing way too much armour to fulfill the infiltration/reconnaissance role of Scouts.

Inceptors not having a melee weapon is stupid, their skids look awful, and the fact that they fly rather than jump is silly.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/12/05 09:41:06


 
   
Made in us
Ancient Venerable Dark Angels Dreadnought





 Ginjitzu wrote:
Intercessors and Aggressors are marked improvements on Tacticals and Terminators.

Reivers are still wearing way too much armour to fulfill the infiltration/reconnaissance role of Scouts.

Inceptors not having a melee weapon is stupid, their skids look awful, and the fact that they fly rather than jump is silly.

What's criminal of Inceptors is how much better their art is than the actual model. The model could work so long as it was posed well. Unfortunately it's posed like arse so you have this wonderful artwork.

Spoiler:


And the delivery was this.

Spoiler:

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/12/05 09:47:39


“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.”
 
   
Made in jp
Bush? No, Eldar Ranger





Mihara, Japan

I'll always be a fully MK 6/2 peep myself.

The only thing better than a good nights sleep, is two good nights sleep. 
   
Made in us
Legendary Master of the Chapter





Chicago, Illinois

Some units are complete misses, some are not. But the variance in models for regular space marines is why I love the normal space marine kits a bit more.

Mark X is cool, but their regular intercessors don't have variance in there helmet design. I wish we had different types of helmets but we don't.

Aggressors look powerful and awe-inspiring but they suck on tabletop.

Inceptors look silly with their toe feet to the point I clipp those off of every inceptor model I have. I love the idea of a space marine with a jump pack wielding dual guns. But I do miss my close combat squads of the Vanguard and Terminators.

From whom are unforgiven we bring the mercy of war. 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut




I hate anything with the Aquila, but overall, without it, it would be my favorite after 3 and 5.

CaptainStabby wrote:
If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.

 jy2 wrote:
BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.

 vipoid wrote:
Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?

 MarsNZ wrote:
ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever.
 
   
Made in us
Legendary Master of the Chapter





Chicago, Illinois

Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
I hate anything with the Aquila, but overall, without it, it would be my favorite after 3 and 5.


Aquillia is what I think of when i think of space marines.

From whom are unforgiven we bring the mercy of war. 
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




Overall I like mk 10, though two things look terrible the me:

Reiver helmets
The shoulder grenade launchers on aggressors.

I really like the look of classic terminator armor and wish they would do a faithful primaris scale update of it (more faithful than aggressors).
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut






Can't stand it. It looks far to slick, smooth and high-tech for my liking. Leave that nonsense to the Tau. Also, they're *stupidly* oversized, but that's largely related to a complete inability on GW's part over the years to keep a sensible handle on how big Space Marines were actually supposed to be, which led to wild overexaggeration and in turn a load of people wanging on about "true scale" for years. Sure, the proportions on the regular marines could have been refined a bit (cf the Space Marine Heroes models, which do this *brilliantly*) but the Primaris are just too big to the point of looking goofy.

The regular guys are the best of a bad bunch; the neck joint's the worst thing about them – they all look like they're sticking their head up through a toilet seat. The flying lads on skis and the Gravis ones just look fat and goofy and the Reivers are just all-round horrible designs, with their stupid little 3/4-length shorts.

Some of this is probably down to having spent around 25 years having a fairly consistently-established view, in my own head, of what a Space Marine should look like, but I also think there were some outright horrible design decisions made on the Primaris. The Deathwatch Vets did a *much* better job of updating the SM aesthetic, in my view.

So yeah, not a fan.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/12/10 09:02:02


 
   
Made in us
Ancient Venerable Dark Angels Dreadnought





 Nazrak wrote:
Can't stand it. It looks far to slick, smooth and high-tech for my liking. Leave that nonsense to the Tau. Also, they're *stupidly* oversized, but that's largely related to a complete inability on GW's part over the years to keep a sensible handle on how big Space Marines were actually supposed to be, which led to wild overexaggeration and in turn a load of people wanging on about "true scale" for years. Sure, the proportions on the regular marines could have been refined a bit (cf the Space Marine Heroes models, which do this *brilliantly*) but the Primaris are just too big to the point of looking goofy.

The regular guys are the best of a bad bunch; the neck joint's the worst thing about them – they all look like they're sticking their head up through a toilet seat. The flying lads on skis and the Gravis ones just look fat and goofy and the Reivers are just all-round horrible designs, with their stupid little 3/4-length shorts.

Some of this is probably down to having spent around 25 years having a fairly consistently-established view, in my own head, of what a Space Marine should look like, but I also think there were some outright horrible design decisions made on the Primaris. The Deathwatch Vets did a *much* better job of updating the SM aesthetic, in my view.

So yeah, not a fan.

Why do people act like MK X is somehow less slick that MK VII? All marine armor as its base is incredibly slick, what makes it unique is bits you slap on it.



Primaris Models actually have MORE detail than base marine models (save perhaps the MK III kit). The only failure of the Intercessor kit is having less varied armor bits than the vanilla tactical kit, which includes MK VI and MK VIII armor.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/12/10 09:14:26


“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.”
 
   
Made in gb
Regular Dakkanaut




Id say the comparison is an intercessor vs a tactical marine, which is a little difficult as the tac marine is effectively the amalgamation of 20/30 years of kits whereas i feel the MkX is a fresh start;

Things i like;

- The scale and size, i love how its both bulky and correctly proportioned.
- The hip armour plates, little addition but i really like it.
- The collar

Things i dont like;

- The knee pad flare
- Lack of variation on helmets- i like the new helmet, but still love the vader style helmet and think that a diff helmet goes a long way to individualizing a model.
- Lack of aquilla variety- again, a different chest peice would go a long way to adding character to each marine.
- Bolt rifle- i just prefer the bolt gun, wish they had just scaled it up and not changed it.
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut




 Asherian Command wrote:
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
I hate anything with the Aquila, but overall, without it, it would be my favorite after 3 and 5.


Aquillia is what I think of when i think of space marines.

I mostly just look at armor, and I hate bling overall. Consequently, i hate every time the aquila shows up. That's just the level at which I operate.

CaptainStabby wrote:
If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.

 jy2 wrote:
BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.

 vipoid wrote:
Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?

 MarsNZ wrote:
ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever.
 
   
Made in de
Contagious Dreadnought of Nurgle





I don't like the helmet, compared to the angry helmet or Mk III it's pretty ugly. But I saw great conversions of Primaris with the older versions. The overall proportions are better and I like their weapons.

Reivers should be a Nightlords specialist unit and have weird poses. Aggressors are the second time of loyalists trying to copy Obliterators, and they stole our powerfists. They look pretty cool, though.
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut



London

Still a Mk8 (deathwatch version)/Mk2/Mk6/Mk3 fan in that order...

Though in regards to the latest I hear Mk9 was a lot better
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut




Primaris marines are what made me fall back in with gw after ten years away. I genuinely wish these were the marines that were available when I started fifteen years ago.

Genuinely love everything about them, bar the goofy names.

greatest band in the universe: machine supremacy

"Punch your fist in the air and hold your Gameboy aloft like the warrior you are" 
   
Made in lt
Regular Dakkanaut





 Elbows wrote:
Completely ambivalent. Enjoy the look of the new Aggressors but their stats are woeful compared to how the models look. Reivers look like poop.


Aggressors are one of the best trash cleanup units SM have
   
Made in ca
Steadfast Ultramarine Sergeant






I like the armour. But with reivers I don't like how they don't have a 7" move. Aggressors have more and move 5",reivers have less and move the same.
   
Made in ca
Decrepit Dakkanaut





Mk X is gorgeous as a model, although like other people I find it weird to have the flared knee pads when the Marines are walking more upright rather than "the crabbed battle-stance of Roboute Guilliman."

I'm a Mk VI man, through and through, but if you're going to have those big collars and the heat-shields on the Inceptors I want to be able to go full Dorvack on all my marines.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/12/10 14:31:41


 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut








Beakies for life my dude
   
Made in us
Steadfast Ultramarine Sergeant






Pfft being able to paint like that you keep doing you
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: