Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Hello all,

Quick question on endless spells. Can you cast the balewind in 1 turn and then cast the cauldron in the second trim and benefit from both of them?

Let me know what you think?

Thanks all

Dave

Looking at rules for both, I’d say no; because each spell requires the spell and the caster to “become” a single model. Neither allows to be attached to an additional endless spell.

Yes. Or vice versa. Both the caster and the spell are treated as a single model and there is no rule saying a single model cannot cast either endless spell. There is also no rule creating or addressing an "attached" status. More notably, if you cast the cauldron first both it and the wizard would jump onto the vortex whereas if you cast it second it would be next to the vortex creating a larger footprint to be measured from. There is tactical value in deciding which way to go with.

I could definitely see them FAQ/Errata-ing this because RAI may be different.