Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I had this idea a while ago, I wanted to post it here so you guys can tell me how to either make it better or why it won’t work. Let me know what you think.

I like it, it looks like a really good way to have movement trays which scale as the unit dies!

Don't know whether you could put an "L" shaped connector in so that the pieces could either be connected close together ("L"'s overlapping) or spread out (top of the "L"'s touching). Might not be feasible, though, or necessary to be fair.

How rigid is it when weighted down with miniatures? I was designing something similar as a modular board a while ago and a designer I consulted suggested that the kind of dovetail/puzzle-piece connectors didn't work particularly well and tended to break easily.

Suggestion would be a way to pick up a central-seven. That way you measure from your pickup point to the final spot. That said, my infantry *personally* try to stick to cover. I usually wouldn’t have use for a movement tray.