Switch Theme:

full movable invictor warsuit?it is possible  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in ua
Regular Dakkanaut





there is a Bandai HG Mobile Worker,



The size of the lower body of the HG Mobile Worker mounted on the invictor warsuit is quite appropriate. now we've got an full movable lower body,the waist and legs, completely movable.

The biggest difficulty here is that you have to make a decent foot, which is almost completely hand-made, very difficult.————————SO,ANY IDEA?


It is hoped that this will give hobbier some inspiration. It is feasible to make a fully movable invictor warsuit in this way.
now you know what to do.
[Thumb - movable invictor warsuit001.jpg]

[Thumb - movable invictor warsuit002.jpg]

[Thumb - movable invictor warsuit003.jpg]

[Thumb - movable invictor warsuit004.jpg]

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2020/11/27 00:02:18


 
   
Made in ua
Regular Dakkanaut





add arms.
[Thumb - invictor warsuit full movable1.jpg]

[Thumb - invictor warsuit full movable2.jpg]

   
Made in ua
Regular Dakkanaut





movable foot testing.
[Thumb - invictor1.jpg]

[Thumb - invictor2.jpg]

   
Made in gb
Crushing Black Templar Crusader Pilot






London

This looks most promising - impressive experimentation

Thanks for sharing!



Relapse wrote:
Baron, don't forget to talk about the SEALs and Marines you habitually beat up on 2 and 3 at a time, as you PM'd me about.
nareik wrote:
Perhaps it is a lube issue, seems obvious now.
 
   
Made in ua
Regular Dakkanaut





I hope someone can transfer those picture to id4chan term.
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut





full closed cockpit,with bits from https://www.shapeways.com/produc ... &li=marketplace

[Thumb - 1.jpg]

[Thumb - 2.jpg]

[Thumb - 3.jpg]

[Thumb - 4.jpg]

   
Made in nz
Fresh-Faced New User




Thats a really cool idea, cant wait to see it with a full paint job and see some dramatic poses
   
Made in it
Perfect Shot Dark Angels Predator Pilot





Sesto San Giovanni, Italy

I think it's entirely feasible, and using some other poseable model is a good idea.

About the foot, for my Cerastuas Knight I substituted the ball joint in the foot with a spherical magnet and... Boom, done.
Magnet are a viable alternative for joints (and they have the bonus advantages that can be separated for transport)

I can't condone a place where abusers and abused are threated the same: it's destined to doom, so there is no reason to participate in it. 
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut





Now it's the hardest step: extending the hinge ,just by 1mm.


There is a biggest problem with the size of the full-closed invictor cockpit conversion bit. You have to use a knife to cut off some part of the original invictor bits to install the hinges. But I didn't want to do that, so I had to spend a lot of effort to modify this conversion bit. But at the last step, I had to modify the hinge, or the Invitor part to make the cockpit cover movable.


The original plan was to modify the invictor parts, but it would have to retrofit two components, which would lead to more problems. In order to simplify as much as possible, I finally decided to reform the hinge.

The structure is shown in the picture. The two hinges marked must be extended by 1 mm. The diameter of the hinge is 1.8 or 2 mm. Because it is made of resin, it is very brittle. When drilling and piling, we are worried about irreversible damage. If the connection strength cannot be guaranteed without piling, the strength of too thin pile, such as 0.5mm, is not enough.
[Thumb - 1.jpg]

   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut





two foots design:

PlanA: human foot-like style,more stable in most pose,but make total-heigh increase by 5mm.

PlanB:classic Dreadnought foot style,more warhammer aesthetical,but need very much work for conversion details.

so,WHICH BETTER?
[Thumb - invictor warsuit movable legs1.jpg]

[Thumb - invictor warsuit movable legs2.jpg]

[Thumb - invictor warsuit movable legs3.jpg]

[Thumb - invictor warsuit movable legs4.jpg]

[Thumb - invictor warsuit movable legs5.jpg]

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2021/02/12 05:08:47


 
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut





comparison with primaris marine and contemptor dreadnought.
[Thumb - 1.jpg]

[Thumb - 2.jpg]

[Thumb - 3.jpg]

   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut





more pictures.
[Thumb - 1.jpg]

[Thumb - 2.jpg]

[Thumb - 3.jpg]

[Thumb - 4.jpg]

   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





I definitely prefer the classic dreadnought foot. It kind of anchors the look in 40k space marines, while the "human" feet make it look like it would fit more in a Tau army.
   
 
Forum Index » Painting & Modeling
Go to: