Switch Theme:

Primaris cloak attached under chest armour  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in se
Growlin' Guntrukk Driver with Killacannon





Sweden

Hello dear dakkanauts!

The recent primaris design cue to attach loin cloths under the chest armour don't sit right with me and I started thinking why. These are the reasons I can think of:

-The old way had them feel like more improvised attachments. They could be tagged to the belt, bolted on the belly armour or hang over the armour like some monk outfit, usually with a waist rope. It's improvised nature made me think it was something fanatical marines made their servitors create. These new primaris designs feel like the actual armour pattern was built with cloak pattern configs in mind. It does not have the improvised feel of the old ways.

-What if the cloak catches fire? It will burn in under the chest armour. Would that not be extremely dangerous?

Do you like this design change? Do you think it improves the immage of cloaks on power armour or does it break your immersion?

Brutal, but kunning!  
   
Made in gb
Horrific Hive Tyrant





If my 40k immersion was going to be broken, it would probably be the chainswords or something equally silly. Cloaks are not going to be it hah

I think they look cool, and I dont think the Imperium really cares about fire risk.
   
Made in de
Mysterious Techpriest






it also might/will break the hermetic seal the armour has and expose the underlying layer to corrosive elements.
It's all kinds of uncool - as pretty much all primaris has been to me. The new flamer looks just as bland and boring.

Data author for Battlescribe
Found a bug? Join, ask, report:
https://discord.gg/pMXqCqWJRE 
   
Made in gb
Leader of the Sept







Maybe the servitors have just had a precision upgrade should be easy enough to match the shape of the chest plate and you could use some kind of magnetic strip to hold it in place.

Also maybe space marine cloth is all made of asbestos. Thinking about it asbestos is the perfect 40k material

Doesn’t rot, doesnt burn, it just kills you horribly after extended exposure. I reckon the Van Saar are rather behind the curve in terms of civilisation deliberately using materials that cause harm…

Please excuse any spelling errors. I use a tablet frequently and software keyboards are a pain!

Terranwing - w3;d1;l1
51st Dunedinw2;d0;l0
Cadre Coronal Afterglow w1;d0;l0 
   
Made in au
Longtime Dakkanaut





That would be because they're more like tabards than loin cloths

   
Made in ca
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion





 Hellebore wrote:
That would be because they're more like tabards than loin cloths


also Mk X armor is modular and layered so it may be possiable to put the lighter shell on put a tabard and then put heavier reinforciung armor on afterwards. *shrugs*

Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two 
   
Made in se
Growlin' Guntrukk Driver with Killacannon





Sweden

 Hellebore wrote:
That would be because they're more like tabards than loin cloths


Seems after some research like like this would have been the more appropriate term. Thank you sir!

Brutal, but kunning!  
   
Made in ca
Steadfast Ultramarine Sergeant






Fire would never burn up under unless there was an accelerant, but you'd have much bigger problems if you were hit with that
   
Made in gb
Stern Iron Priest with Thrall Bodyguard



UK

 Thairne wrote:
it also might/will break the hermetic seal the armour has and expose the underlying layer to corrosive elements.
It's all kinds of uncool - as pretty much all primaris has been to me. The new flamer looks just as bland and boring.


With trueborn armour youd be correct, but primaris armour is armour plates attached to the under later using connection points and magnetism.

It's modular nature means the seal is maintained By the body suit the armour connects to.
   
Made in ca
Longtime Dakkanaut






Personally I like it. I have the best of both worlds, armoured chest that I can put Maltese crosses on, and it’s easier for me to sculpt a smaller robe only on the stomach and loin cloth on existing models.

I am truly terrible at sculpting.

Also, all of the blade guard vets have that’s type and I like keeping things the same.

Square Bases for Life!
AoS is pure garbage
Kill Primaris, Kill the Primarchs. They don't belong in 40K
40K is fantasy in space, not sci-fi 
   
Made in gb
Mekboy Hammerin' Somethin'





United Kingdom

 fraser1191 wrote:
Fire would never burn up under unless there was an accelerant, but you'd have much bigger problems if you were hit with that


An accelerant like burning prometheum or squig oil perhaps?
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut





Considering the combat zones space marines drop into their robes can’t last long, the dark angels must spend a fortune on fabric
   
Made in ca
Steadfast Ultramarine Sergeant






 Afrodactyl wrote:
 fraser1191 wrote:
Fire would never burn up under unless there was an accelerant, but you'd have much bigger problems if you were hit with that


An accelerant like burning prometheum or squig oil perhaps?


Yeah, the good burny stuff!
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: