Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Per the newest updates, Necron Point Costs seem to be wrong in a few places.
Power Levels and Point Costs do not match evenly for the same unit.
Theoretically, it is 1 PL for each 20 (or part thereof) basic Point Cost.
But, these seem off ....

HQ
Chronomancer, 5 PL, should be 4 PL
Technomancer, ,5 PL, should be 4 PL

Elites
Shard o/t Deceiver, 18 PL, should be 15 PL
Shard o/t Nightbringer, 19 PL, should be 16 PL
Shard o/t Void Dragon, 18 PL, should be 15 PL

Fast Attack

Heavy Support
Annihiliation Barge, 7 PL, should be 6 PL

Dedicated Transport
Ghost Ark, 8 PL, should be 7 PL

Lord Of War
Gauss Pylon, 24 PL, should be 23 PL
Seraptek Heavy Construct, 33 PL, should be 30 PL

Fortifications
Convergence Of Dominion, 6 PL, should be 5 PL
Sentry Pylon, 6 PL, should be 5 PL

What have I missed?

GW often don't update PL. Certainly not at the same rate they do for points. It's one of the many reasons I'd favour points over PL.

If you do end up running a Crusade and need to use power level for requisition purchases and initial army builds then just make an updated conversion like you did here and make sure your gaming group doesn't have any issues with it.

At least its rather easy to update Power Levels on your own. GW just doesn't have much incentive to update PL when its really only for Crusade mechanics and learner games.

Thank you