Suggestions on Improving Adepticon

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**Anaxagoras**

Sidstyler wrote:
Railing against the accepted FAQ at an event if you happen to disagree with, is 'browbeating' and is 'unsportsmanlike'. That is why the event organizer made the FAQ and during the event is not the time to fight the power. If you don't like the house rules, don't play at the house.

I wasn't aware that this thread was Adepticon, and that by complaining about their use of the INAT here, after the event was done, is the same as complaining during the event.

House rules are just fine, if that's the way Adepticon wants to roll, with INAT40k, then so be it. I'm just saying that I probably won't attend if they insist on using it.

And that's another thing too, just because I hate the damn thing doesn't mean I still wouldn't give it a try. The main reason I haven't been to Adepticon yet is just the fact that I can't afford to travel, let alone for a three day event like that. Maybe I'm all wrong about it, who knows.

Basically say what you mean: "I will only support a FAQ that 100% agrees with how I play the game."

And that makes you a poor sport as not everyone everywhere will agree with you. The inability to accept that and accept people may disagree with your interpretations makes one a poor sport.

If you want everyone to play by your rules, then run your own events and make your own FAQ and enforce it. Problem solved.

I thought this thread was titled "suggestions for improving Adepticon". Now I'm being told that if I don't like it I should just run my own event?

I'm sorry guy, do you want people to post their opinions or not?

Fine then. I'll just keep my mouth shut, apparently Adepticon doesn't need or want my suggestions anyway. After all I'm just an donkey-cave browbeating TFG right? Because you know me, you've played games with me a thousand times before and as such have the authority to judge how good of a sportsman I am?

So....I really have to ask why you would even post advice on how to better an event that you haven't even attended.

My suggestion would be to either start or add to a thread addressing issues with the INAT.

**Danny Internets**

So....I really have to ask why you would even post advice on how to better an event that you haven't even attended.

Maybe because he'd like to consider attending it if it were to be improved? Attending an event doesn't impact some secret elitist knowledge pertaining to any of Sidstyler's points. They stand on their own merits as they relate to this event and similiar ones.

**Frazzled**

yes it does. Its a thread asking for feedback, not boos from the peanut gallery BY PEOPLE WHO DID NOT ATTEND.

Modquisition on.
People trolling this thread will be suspended. Be advised this counts as notice to all posters.

Absent request by Yakface or the Adepticon organizers to the contrary, due to the nature of the thread FOR FEEDBACK ABOUT THE ACTUAL TOURNEY, posts after this thread should be limited to those who either attended the event or who did not attend specifically for a reason related to the tournament itself.

If you want to comment on the Adpeticon FAQ or more esoteric hypothetics great, but do it in a separate thread.

**Black Blow Fly**

Good call Frazz. Let's keep this discussion on topic.

G