Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
2012/09/06 18:05:49
Subject: is it smarter to go for secondary objectives?
I'm not saying it is stupid. I'm saying you can do whatever you want. Call it godhammer, call it phobos, call it the herald of retribution, call it the USS Jellybeen, its your model, and your army.
About 3000
2012/08/24 16:08:58
Subject: is it smarter to go for secondary objectives?
Armadeus wrote: I'm not saying it is stupid. I'm saying you can do whatever you want. Call it godhammer, call it phobos, call it the herald of retribution, call it the USS Jellybeen, its your model, and your army.
I know; just sayin'
Dakka member since 2012/01/09 16:44:06
Rick's Cards&Games 1000pt Tourney: 2nd Legion's Winter Showdown 1850: 2nd Place Snake Eyes 1000pt Mixed Doubles: 3rd Place
Elysian 105th Skylance W:37-L:3-D:6 in 6th Edition
About 3000 
