Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

 insaniak wrote:

 Jstncloud wrote:
... furthermore the top level can be accessed via a designated access point/ladder (so they could get back up there without jump, this is covered in that 'rules' section').

From memory, the only access to the roof of the Bastion is from inside. So if the lower level is rendered impassable by a damage result, the only way up or down is to fly or jump.

So I have one user saying it hurts both and one saying it hurts just one.

So at that point, you go back to the rulebook, and re-read the section on Multiple Part Buildings.

The part you're looking for is the last sentence of the first paragraph, where is specifically says that they are dealt with separately for shooting and assaults.

There is a line in the rules talking about a ladder/access points on the outside.

Thanks for all of the clarification(s).

 Jstncloud wrote:
There is a line in the rules talking about a ladder/access points on the outside.

Yes, there is. It's saying that you can use them if the model has them. It's not a free pass to climb up the outside of the building if no external access is actually modelled.

Bastions, typically, do not have ladders on the outside, unless they have been modified. Seeing how I was responding to your particular instance, quoting the rule to me was really not necessary, but thank you.

 FoxPhoenix135 wrote:
Bastions, typically, do not have ladders on the outside, unless they have been modified. Seeing how I was responding to your particular instance, quoting the rule to me was really not necessary, but thank you.

If you don't want to respond to me threads or posts without coming across in a condescending manor then feel free to ignore them.

Thanks to insaniak for being one of the few people to post in my thread 'without' being a smart-ass and/or rude, no sarcasm here, of most of the people you are the only one who hasn't came across as 'mean' or 'rude' towards me.

If a mod reads this feel free to close the thread, the question(s) I asked have been addressed/answered and no further comments or posts are warranted. (Unless more of the same is posted).

As a rule we don't lock a thread unless it's really necessary. If other people have related questions, and the discussion isn't violating any rules, we'll usually leave it open. I'm glad your questions were answered.