Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 05:21:53
Subject: Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Ian Pickstock
Nottingham
|
So I saw on the internet about how the Dark Angels codex was a rip off, bla bla bla...then I looked at my friend's in the flesh and was pretty impressed. The full, bright colours worked really well and the cover binding looked very smooth.
All in all I can't wait until the Imperial Guard get their new codex
|
Naaa na na na-na-na-naaa.
Na-na-na-naaaaa.
Hey Jude. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 05:24:45
Subject: Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Blood Angel Terminator with Lightning Claws
|
Full color is always nice, but what really sells it for me is the reference section on the back, saves a lot of page turning and reduces the risk of page tearing if you flip through it too fast.
|
GW: "We do no demographic research, we have no focus groups, we do not ask the market what it wants" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 05:48:51
Subject: Re:Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Hellish Haemonculus
|
I grant that the new style comes with a lot of perks, I just don't think it justifies the price tag. I have been a GW apologist for a long time, and while I have defended price hikes, Finecast, and several other practices that see lots of Internet outrage threads, I find it hard to see the harcover Codexes as anything but a transparent attempt to charge more for the product.
That being said, I think they ARE better put together than the old ones, and ARE worth a price increase, just not one so high.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 06:24:30
Subject: Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Land Raider Pilot on Cruise Control
|
The style is nice.
They are not however, worth charging double the price. I used to buy every codex straight from GW just to read them...not any more.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 06:28:33
Subject: Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
I think the new style of Codex is very nice. I still think the way they have the fluff and rules... but not all the rules... and then some more rules in the armoury... and then some more rules at the end is stupid (just put 'em on one page), but other than that it's fine. Not at all worth the stupidly inflated price though (hardbacks do not cost that much GW - the ones I get from FFG are better produced and cost less). They'd be the kind've thing I buy because I need to, not because I just want to read it. They're too expensive now just to be books I'll never use.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/01/24 06:29:00
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 06:31:25
Subject: Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Blood Angel Terminator with Lightning Claws
|
Griever wrote:The style is nice.
They are not however, worth charging double the price. I used to buy every codex straight from GW just to read them...not any more.
Seems like a waste to me if ur not playing all those army. And if you just wanted to read them, well, their are other ways to read the codices (I will say no more)
|
GW: "We do no demographic research, we have no focus groups, we do not ask the market what it wants" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 07:43:52
Subject: Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Bounding Assault Marine
|
I have not personally seen one of the new codices in person, but from the pics I have seen and retailers is that this style is of very good quality and is a major upgrade, the price seems a little daunting but I will buy a DA codex soon and when C:SM drops I will certainly buy one and it will be top quality.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 07:49:11
Subject: Re:Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Emboldened Warlock
Duncan, B.C
|
I think they're great. The fold out reference section is an excellent idea (particularly for chaos and their boon table) and the quality has so far been excellent. Most of my old codices (all 4th edition) have been starting to fall apart for a couple years, something I don't really see happening with the hard cover. Considering this is a book that I'll be referencing alot for 5+ years, $12 (or less) a year isn't so bad for a well put together book with good artwork and nice fluff. The only problem is as others have said. It does make owning all the codices pretty impractical.
|
40k Armies:
Alaitoc 9300 points
Chaos 15000 points
Speed Freeks 3850 points
WHFB Armies:
Lizardmen 1000 points
Check out my blog at http://wayofthedice.blogspot.ca/ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 07:51:34
Subject: Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Boosting Black Templar Biker
|
Personally I find the best thing about the new format to be the reference section in the end. Having the special rules there instead of needing to go to the middle of the book - and often several different pages there, factoring unit-specific things - is very nice.
Still, the hardcover takes more space when hauling it around - which is why I'll probably just photocopy the army list and reference section to take with me once C:SM and/or C:BT are released - and of course the price 50% price increase is a bit meh.
|
Armies:
Primary: Black Templars Crimson Fists Orks
Allied: Sisters of Battle Imperial Guard |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 07:56:28
Subject: Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Heroic Senior Officer
|
BryllCream wrote:So I saw on the internet about how the Dark Angels codex was a rip off, bla bla bla...then I looked at my friend's in the flesh and was pretty impressed. The full, bright colours worked really well and the cover binding looked very smooth.
All in all I can't wait until the Imperial Guard get their new codex 
Take everything you said and invert it.
I hate it and count every day that I don't have one as a good thing.
But you already knew that
|
'I've played Guard for years, and the best piece of advice is to always utilize the Guard's best special rule: "we roll more dice than you" ' - stormleader
"Sector Imperialis: 25mm and 40mm Round Bases (40+20) 26€ (Including 32 skulls for basing) " GW design philosophy in a nutshell |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 08:03:33
Subject: Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Ian Pickstock
Nottingham
|
MrMoustaffa wrote: BryllCream wrote:So I saw on the internet about how the Dark Angels codex was a rip off, bla bla bla...then I looked at my friend's in the flesh and was pretty impressed. The full, bright colours worked really well and the cover binding looked very smooth.
All in all I can't wait until the Imperial Guard get their new codex 
Take everything you said and invert it.
I hate it and count every day that I don't have one as a good thing.
But you already knew that 
But...why? The artwork is gorgeous, everything is laid out neatly...what's to hate?
|
Naaa na na na-na-na-naaa.
Na-na-na-naaaaa.
Hey Jude. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 08:21:27
Subject: Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Heroic Senior Officer
|
Artwork is mostly recycled, large price increase for relatively nothing new, hardbacks are a pain to get spiralbound, could give a squig'z arse over better paper, layout is confusing/no better than the old codexes, etc.
I've listed them before. I'll bow out of this thread now, I really shouldn't have posted to begin with in hindsight, as i have nothing to contribute.
My bad, I'll let you guys continue.
|
'I've played Guard for years, and the best piece of advice is to always utilize the Guard's best special rule: "we roll more dice than you" ' - stormleader
"Sector Imperialis: 25mm and 40mm Round Bases (40+20) 26€ (Including 32 skulls for basing) " GW design philosophy in a nutshell |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 08:34:13
Subject: Re:Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Angry Blood Angel Assault marine
|
Picked up the DA codex yesterday and I really like the new style, feels like a lovely quality product, I'd be scared to take it to lots of games though as it's so nice. Glad I didn't fork out for the collector's edition I wouldn't let it leave the house!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 14:29:57
Subject: Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Lone Wolf Sentinel Pilot
|
I do like the new style, but when 3rd came out I bought every codex just to have it. RIght now, with the main rulebook costing $70 and each new codex costing $50, I can't justify it. I need to get the rulebook first, and I may just do what I did in 5th and scour eBay for a Dark Vengeance booklet.
But I too am looking forward to the Space Marine, Tyranid and IG codeci.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 14:38:56
Subject: Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Lesser Daemon of Chaos
|
If you just play one or two armies, I think the hardback is great. Sure, it's really expensive, but it feels more sturdy than a paper book. Like, hypothetically, it's more likely that you'd tear up a paperback due to flipping through and bending the cover and whatnot, maybe to the point of having to buy a new codex. Hardback books aren't as likely to get torn up from general wear and tear, so they'll last longer.
At least, that's my justification for it.
Also, printing in full color isn't cheap, but it looks awesome.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 14:40:30
Subject: Re:Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets
|
I dig the hardback codex's. Provided they don't fall apart like GWs old hardback books.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 14:48:11
Subject: Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Plummeting Black Templar Thunderhawk Pilot
|
I would have liked the choice to either paper or hardback. Most people seem to just say they like the quick reference sheet in the back. I do not like most of the entries. For example the hellbrute. It is almost word for word a chaos dreadnaught. Even about taking the coffin out if the dread/hellbrute to keep it inactive. Hellbrute is supposed to be a living huge creature of chaos. Not a dread walker with a removable pilot. Could just be nitpicking, just felt too much cut and copy for older units.
|
Black Templars 4000 Deathwatch 6000
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 14:53:23
Subject: Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
I like it. As I said last month when this thread came up about he Chaos Codex, it's just 10-15 bucks too high.
|
DA:70S+G+M+B++I++Pw40k08+D++A++/fWD-R+T(M)DM+
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 14:56:00
Subject: Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Consigned to the Grim Darkness
|
I wouldn't know, both of them are marine codices, so I haven't bought either one They do seem a bit overpriced though, so maybe they're using better materials? Or... maybe they're just being games workshop. Meh.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/01/24 14:56:19
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 14:56:00
Subject: Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Frenzied Berserker Terminator
Hatfield, PA
|
BryllCream wrote:So I saw on the internet about how the Dark Angels codex was a rip off, bla bla bla...then I looked at my friend's in the flesh and was pretty impressed. The full, bright colours worked really well and the cover binding looked very smooth.
All in all I can't wait until the Imperial Guard get their new codex 
They are nice books. The color is looks good. The contents are good. I am also liking how so far neither of the two new books looks to be very over powered and I am hoping that will be a trend going forward.
The only problem for me is the near 100% price increase by going from soft cover to hard cover. I used to like to buy all the codex books just to keep up to speed and see what is out there, but at $49.50 a pop I'm just going to do so anymore.
Beyond the cost issue I am happy with what I see. New units, new models, new options within units. All make me a happy camper. I like options and both new codex books have them in spades. Not being a min/max WAAC cost player it doesn't matter to me that all the options aren't "perfect". In both books the only unit that makes no sense to me are the mutilators from the CSM Codex which are melee only, but slow and purposeful which makes it tough to get close enough to be much of a threat at all.
Skriker
|
CSM 6k points CSM 4k points
CSM 4.5k points CSM 3.5k points
 and Daemons 4k points each
Renegades 4k points
SM 4k points
SM 2.5k Points
3K 2.3k
EW, MW and LW British in Flames of War |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 14:56:34
Subject: Re:Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Blood-Raging Khorne Berserker
|
I like the new codex style. I just wish they would hire an editor with the increased price.
|
I need to return some video tapes.
Skulls for the Skull Throne |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 14:58:34
Subject: Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
I don't mind the decision to go with a hardback codex, but like labmouse42, I'm worried about the durability of the binding and the long-term quality of the product. Looks pretty decent and the newer artwork (or the stuff I've seen less of, such as the cover and those like it) is amazing. My biggest issue, however, is the cost.
A few people have said that they believe having codices of the armies you don't play is superfluous and I think that, while I respect your opinion, I do not share it. The more I know about the opposition, the better I can build an army with the forces I DO play with, to try and mitigate any really unpleasant surprises. That way, for instance, when I see a Death Company charging across the board, I don't say to myself, "let me put this good unit in front of them" but instead, this crummy one that with bog it down for turns. Or like being surprised by one of the Dark Eldar exotic weapons.
To that end, knowing the other codices is important and why I have, in the past, bought all of them. At $50 each, plus the rule book, if they all go hard-cover, that's almost a thousand dollars ($870) just on the primary books! Just a bit ludicrous if you ask me.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 15:02:39
Subject: Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Blood Angel Terminator with Lightning Claws
Sioux Falls, SD
|
The new cost(I know not directly related to the change to hard cover and full color) is a bit to high, but I do like the new looks of the codex's.
Plus I found my new Dark Angels codex at a hobby store for $33
|
Blood for the bloo... wait no, I meant for Sanguinius! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 15:05:02
Subject: Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Fireknife Shas'el
|
I Like my Hardback. The illustrations and pictures are gorgeous. However Charging 50 dollars for it seems more than excessive.
|
8000 Dark Angels (No primaris)
10000 Lizardmen (Fantasy I miss you)
3000 High Elves
4000 Kel'shan Ta'u
"He attacked everything in life with a mix of extraordinary genius and naive incompetence, and it was often difficult to tell which was which." -Douglas Adams |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 15:05:06
Subject: Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Frenzied Berserker Terminator
Hatfield, PA
|
conker249 wrote:I would have liked the choice to either paper or hardback. Most people seem to just say they like the quick reference sheet in the back. I do not like most of the entries. For example the hellbrute. It is almost word for word a chaos dreadnaught. Even about taking the coffin out if the dread/hellbrute to keep it inactive. Hellbrute is supposed to be a living huge creature of chaos. Not a dread walker with a removable pilot. Could just be nitpicking, just felt too much cut and copy for older units.
Actually if you read the entry the Helbrute is *not* supposed to be a living huge creature of chaos. Even in the Dark Vengeance box it is made clear that the Helbrute has someone encased inside of it to control it. It is a chaos dreadnought. It is just called something different now and the base model in DV is just much more corrupted by chaos instead of the previous model that looks like a dreadnought with more spikes. The helbrute harkens back to the days of the early chaos dreadnoughts that looked like they were living entities, but were still dreads. They just looked more corrupted.
Not sure where you are getting the "the Helbrute is supposed to be a living huge creature of chaos" from since it is spelled out everywhere that such is not the case.
Skriker
|
CSM 6k points CSM 4k points
CSM 4.5k points CSM 3.5k points
 and Daemons 4k points each
Renegades 4k points
SM 4k points
SM 2.5k Points
3K 2.3k
EW, MW and LW British in Flames of War |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 20:18:53
Subject: Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Plummeting Black Templar Thunderhawk Pilot
|
I guess I was mistaken. Just an opinion. I really do like the codex as a whole. Just wish it had more chaos gods stuff like sacred numbers and all. Very playable codex.
|
Black Templars 4000 Deathwatch 6000
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/24 20:37:59
Subject: Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Lone Wolf Sentinel Pilot
|
At the risk of being repetitive, I think that full colour Codices = good, major price increase = bad.
|
Driven away from WH40K by rules bloat and the expense of keeping up, now interested in smaller model count games and anything with nifty mechanics. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/25 09:16:30
Subject: Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Boosting Black Templar Biker
|
Skriker wrote:The only problem for me is the near 100% price increase by going from soft cover to hard cover. I used to like to buy all the codex books just to keep up to speed and see what is out there, but at $49.50 a pop I'm just going to do so anymore.
Hmm, at least in Finland the price hike was exactly 50%, from 26 euros to 39 euros. Especially considering how short the BT Codex is, I suppose compared to it the newer hardbacks are indeed better value
|
Armies:
Primary: Black Templars Crimson Fists Orks
Allied: Sisters of Battle Imperial Guard |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/25 09:43:26
Subject: Re:Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Spawn of Chaos
|
Price is a bit of an issue, but I do really prefer the new codices to the old paperback style.
That being said, they have their flaws, as do all things, but at least my CSM codex hasn't fallen apart yet............yet.
|
"And they shall stammer"
3000+ pts Chaos Space Marines
~500pts Imperial guard
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/25 14:26:27
Subject: Who else really likes the new codex style?
|
 |
Frenzied Berserker Terminator
Hatfield, PA
|
conker249 wrote:I guess I was mistaken. Just an opinion. I really do like the codex as a whole. Just wish it had more chaos gods stuff like sacred numbers and all. Very playable codex.
Nothing wrong with having an opinion.  Only thing is that your opinion won't necessarily be reflected in the rules.  You can certainly state that your helbrutes are more living chaos creatures in your army and model them as such with some cool conversions combining the DV helbrute and some other creature bits from various lines. They would make for some really cool models and it would not keep them from working just fine on the table top based on the actual rules either.
Skriker Automatically Appended Next Post: tvih wrote:
Hmm, at least in Finland the price hike was exactly 50%, from 26 euros to 39 euros. Especially considering how short the BT Codex is, I suppose compared to it the newer hardbacks are indeed better value
True dat! The prices on some of those smaller codecies was pricey indeed. Never ended up wih the Black Templars book in my library. By the time it came out I already had too many marine books as it was I felt.  Being here it is interesting to see that they have generated quite a following and still have their followers despite having an old and out of date book. I started out in Rogue trader with a genestealer chaos cult and expanded fully into chaos there and have had chaos armies in one form or another constantly since then so I can respect that. Generally whatever is in the CSM codex is how I use all the minis I have already and doesn't determine if I will stop playing chaos or not. Stopping playing chaos isn't an option at all...
Skriker
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/01/25 14:30:56
CSM 6k points CSM 4k points
CSM 4.5k points CSM 3.5k points
 and Daemons 4k points each
Renegades 4k points
SM 4k points
SM 2.5k Points
3K 2.3k
EW, MW and LW British in Flames of War |
|
 |
 |
|