Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 15:29:03
Subject: New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
West Midlands (UK)
|
shamikebab wrote:A sons of Dorn supplement could have a BT list then characters, fluff and equipment for all three.
Sarpedon and his boys feel lonely. They want in too!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 15:37:20
Subject: New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
|
I have nothing to say but "Meh". Everybody gets a giant model is lame. Why is Forgeworld so, so much better than regular GW?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 15:39:37
Subject: Re:New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Boom! Leman Russ Commander
|
kronk wrote:Puscifer wrote: Zweischneid wrote:Funny how all those "rumours" about Space Marines getting supplement Codexes only start dropping after we've seen the Iyanden book.
Surely, if someone had this kind of info, it would've made sense to spill that 3 weeks ago and immortalize yourself forever as the go-to rumour-monger.
If I knew about this three weeks ago, I would have posted about it.
Also having not seen a Contemptor for a scale reference, I would think that the ubernought as you put it is the Contemptor GW style.
Scale picture below. I'm not sure what the ubernought is a reference to, but I would think something entirely different. Cannibalizing one of FW's better sellers doesn't seem like a good idea.

Ahhhh thanks for that.
Tbh, I think a bigger version would look awesome.
I don't care much for it's arms though.
|
Mr Mystery wrote:Suffice to say, if any of this is actually true, then clearly Elvis is hiding behind my left testicle, and Lord Lucan behind the right. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 15:42:47
Subject: Re:New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Speculation.
I'm going to add Puscifer though since he is posting it as rumors.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 15:44:24
Subject: New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Terminator with Assault Cannon
|
timetowaste85 wrote: SickSix wrote:I am still calling BT as first supplement book.
I find UM and IF books laughable as they are strictest adherents to the Codex Astartes there are. What possible deviations would they invent to justify them getting supplements?
Why couldn't the BT come in the IF book? They are a branch of the IF, same as the CFs, and I think I'd actually enjoy having a "Sons of Dorn" supplement book. The book could be broken down into sections outlining each group and giving the necessary units and characters in each of the three sections. I'm a BT fan, but a Sons of Dorn supplement would be a dream for me. Yes, I realize they play differently, but it would be doable, get the BT brought up to speed while not actually putting them in the "space marine codex", as GW said they weren't doing. It's a win win, honestly, I don't see a loss doing it this way.
if they do it like that, basically First Founding books that also include notable successors, that would be cool.
But Salamanders and IH need books of their own as well.
|
SickSix's Silver Skull WIP thread
My Youtube Channel
JSF wrote:... this is really quite an audacious move by GW, throwing out any pretext that this is a game and that its customers exist to do anything other than buy their overpriced products for the sake of it. The naked arrogance, greed and contempt for their audience is shocking. = Epic First Post.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 15:49:09
Subject: Re:New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Ian Pickstock
Nottingham
|
Ultramarines really, really shouldn't get a supplement. They are the original codex chapter for goodness sake.
|
Naaa na na na-na-na-naaa.
Na-na-na-naaaaa.
Hey Jude. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 15:50:09
Subject: Re:New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
BryllCream wrote:Ultramarines really, really shouldn't get a supplement. They are the original codex chapter for goodness sake.
Did you miss the part where he said that Codex: SM was going to be generic for all marines? So UM will get a supplement to add in their special sauce...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 15:53:21
Subject: New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Boosting Space Marine Biker
|
In regards to the 5-man tactical squad boxes, we already have those (albeit as those snap-fit types) http://www.games-workshop.com/gws/catalog/productDetail.jsp?catId=cat440273a&prodId=prod1060075
They're currently £15.50 to the 10-man's £23. Maybe we'll see the 10-man box bumped to £30-ish?
Glad I bought all mine already in any case.
If we get another baby-carrier, I'll be proxying a Contemptor instead I think. I do hope we get a box of vanguard vets (and that they get made viable), however.
I'd also like to see apothecaries return as SC.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2013/06/12 15:57:24
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 15:54:09
Subject: New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Wight Lord with the Sword of Kings
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 15:54:54
Subject: New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Boosting Space Marine Biker
|
No? I stand corrected then.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 15:57:37
Subject: Re:New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Morphing Obliterator
|
pretre wrote: BryllCream wrote:Ultramarines really, really shouldn't get a supplement. They are the original codex chapter for goodness sake.
Did you miss the part where he said that Codex: SM was going to be generic for all marines? So UM will get a supplement to add in their special sauce...
I think that is the point he is trying to make. Apart from special characters and the Tyranid Hunter unit (who could easily be represented by Sternguard with Preferred Enemy:Tyranids), Ultramarines don't really have any special sauce. They are the definition of a codex chapter.
As for the supplements, I am all for them but I think they should combine more than one chapter/legion/craftworld into each book. You don't really need pages and pages of background for a sub faction when they will probably have a pretty decent outline of their history in the main codex anyway (Codex Eldar gives you all the info about Iyanden's background you really need imo).
I will likely pick up the Biel Tan supplement if they do one though as my Eldar army has a lot of aspect warriors in it.
|
Chaos Space Marines - Iron Warriors & Night Lords 7900pts
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 16:00:39
Subject: Re:New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
rohansoldier wrote: pretre wrote: BryllCream wrote:Ultramarines really, really shouldn't get a supplement. They are the original codex chapter for goodness sake.
Did you miss the part where he said that Codex: SM was going to be generic for all marines? So UM will get a supplement to add in their special sauce...
I think that is the point he is trying to make. Apart from special characters and the Tyranid Hunter unit (who could easily be represented by Sternguard with Preferred Enemy:Tyranids), Ultramarines don't really have any special sauce. They are the definition of a codex chapter.
Why would that stop them from making a supplement?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 16:01:47
Subject: New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
These are the snap fit Space Marines.
I'm hopeful that there won't be a mega dreadnought in a baby carrier, but I guess we'll see.
|
DA:70S+G+M+B++I++Pw40k08+D++A++/fWD-R+T(M)DM+
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 16:06:20
Subject: New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Terminator with Assault Cannon
|
Yeah, I think they would have to murder the UM fluff to give them any kind of 'special sauce'. But as we have seen, GW is great at murdering fluff.
I hope for a plastic stern/vanguard combo kit, and a plastic terminator character kit (captain/chappy/libby). Hell I would love a plastic combo kit for PA chappy/libby.
|
SickSix's Silver Skull WIP thread
My Youtube Channel
JSF wrote:... this is really quite an audacious move by GW, throwing out any pretext that this is a game and that its customers exist to do anything other than buy their overpriced products for the sake of it. The naked arrogance, greed and contempt for their audience is shocking. = Epic First Post.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 16:09:58
Subject: New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Major
In a van down by the river
|
SickSix wrote:Yeah, I think they would have to murder the UM fluff to give them any kind of 'special sauce'. But as we have seen, GW is great at murdering fluff.
I hope for a plastic stern/vanguard combo kit, and a plastic terminator character kit (captain/chappy/libby). Hell I would love a plastic combo kit for PA chappy/libby.
A versatile Terminator character kit might actually get me to buy something.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 16:35:36
Subject: New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Ancient Chaos Terminator
|
H.B.M.C. wrote:Well Nippy can fight my Khornemower, Lord Skullington Wexford the Third. 
Shouldn't that be Lord Skullington Wexford the Fourth, Eighth or Sixteenth?
Zweischneid wrote: Sarpedon and his boys feel lonely. They want in too!
If only they were still Sons of Dorn.. Too bad they are not.
|
"I have traveled trough the Realm of Death and brought back novelty pencils"
Oh, somewhere in this favored land the sun is shining bright;
the band is playing somewhere and somewhere hearts are light,and somewhere men are laughing, and somewhere children shout but there is no joy in Mudville — mighty Casey has struck out. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 16:54:16
Subject: New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Boom! Leman Russ Commander
|
I'd like to see new SM Bikes.
It's too old and with White Scars being first, I'd say it's probable.
But I just found an amazing painting guide for Ultramarines done in metallics. Going to test it on a commander first to see if I can match or better the quality.
|
Mr Mystery wrote:Suffice to say, if any of this is actually true, then clearly Elvis is hiding behind my left testicle, and Lord Lucan behind the right. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 17:06:59
Subject: New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
If the Marines get new bikes while Eldar are saddled with the 90's Jetbikes then there is no justice in the world....
|
WWW.conclaveofhar.com - Now with our first Podcast!
Also check out our Facebook Group!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 17:14:56
Subject: New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I'll laugh if the new Space Marine codex gets unique psychic powers when the DA's didn't. It would speak to the level of how all first codexes from a new edition always get overshadowed by following releases...and the cycle continues...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 17:16:44
Subject: New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
The DA got 1 unique power, though. The one their master Librarian can take.
Other than Eldar, most of the Codex-Specific Psychic Powers are on par with or worse than the BRB powers, so I don't see this as a big deal, personally.
|
DA:70S+G+M+B++I++Pw40k08+D++A++/fWD-R+T(M)DM+
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 17:27:17
Subject: Re:New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
West Midlands (UK)
|
When was the last time Games Workshop replaced an existing plastic kit for Warhammer 40K, such as Space Marine bikes, with a new plastic kit?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 17:30:51
Subject: New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Frenzied Berserker Terminator
|
They did with the Dark Eldar, didn't they?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 18:10:11
Subject: New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Zealous Knight
|
SickSix wrote:Yeah, I think they would have to murder the UM fluff to give them any kind of 'special sauce'. But as we have seen, GW is great at murdering fluff. I hope for a plastic stern/vanguard combo kit, and a plastic terminator character kit (captain/chappy/libby). Hell I would love a plastic combo kit for PA chappy/libby. How about actually restricting them from doing certain things but giving some kind of competence bonus (or whatever...) for über-codex-astartes-compliance? I could kind of see that work. Of course stuff like the tirannic war veterans will go right into that UM expansion as well as any specific characters - and I don't think a different warlord trait table would murder their fluff all too brutally? edit @ Zwei they retooled the tac squad with more options and completely different sprue layouts.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/06/12 18:11:08
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 18:11:36
Subject: New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
They did, although those were baaaaaaadddd kits.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 18:12:16
Subject: New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Zealous Knight
|
...And you'd say the SM bike has withstood the test of time acceptably?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 18:14:00
Subject: New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Major
In a van down by the river
|
Yes, so the answer is technically 2.5 years ago if memory serves.
However, that was also a wholesale revamp of the entire range; I think maybe Drazhar and the "Dark Eldar Prisoners" were the only portions to be carried forward and I'm not even sure of them.
Since then I'm not really recalling them doing anything of a re-vamp of plastic; it's been moving from FineCast to plastic and/or new units. Now, if any line would get such a thing now, it'd probably be the Space Marines, but I wouldn't hold my breath on that one.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 18:14:24
Subject: New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Bolognesus wrote:...And you'd say the SM bike has withstood the test of time acceptably?
Yep.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 18:17:01
Subject: New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Zealous Knight
|
...Zoinks. Takes all kinds, I guess
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 18:19:37
Subject: New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
I rather like the basic space marine kit.
Easy to assemble, you can add other shoulder pads, works with the devastator, assault marine, and other kits just fine.
I'm into the HH kits from FW now, though. Sigh...
|
DA:70S+G+M+B++I++Pw40k08+D++A++/fWD-R+T(M)DM+
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/12 18:22:47
Subject: New Space Marine Codex Rumours
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Beaver Dam, WI
|
Krinsath wrote: Kirasu wrote:I hope they put a dreadnought inside a bigger dreadnought, slap an oval base on it and charge us 100$
It will be a DreadKnight-style baby carrier, but for a Dreadnought! It will be called the DreadKnightNought, and will cost $120.
As much as I'm excited as a Marine collector since the RTB01 days, the emphasis of the past few releases has me cringing at what they're going to try to pass off this time. Thankfully I don't have any model budget left to spend on anything less than fantastic, so I'm pretty sure I'm safe for a while.
Dreadnought of course needs to be purchased separately.....
|
|
|
 |
 |
|