Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/22 02:28:55
Subject: Would deathwing armies be competative if centurions were in the dark angels codex?
|
 |
Battlefortress Driver with Krusha Wheel
|
Say 3 squads of dev centurions, and then just deathwing termies marching up the field? I think it would be a lot more competitive with say 3 squads with grav guns, and the seargent with las/missles and an omniscope.
|
warhammer 40k mmo. If I can drive an ork trukk into the back of a space marine dread and explode in a fireball of epic, I can die happy!
8k points
3k points
3k points
Admech 2.5k points
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/22 03:49:05
Subject: Would deathwing armies be competative if centurions were in the dark angels codex?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Yes, but deathwing only uses terminator armour.
-edit-
What are centurions deepstrike capabilities?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/11/22 03:50:54
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/22 04:54:14
Subject: Re:Would deathwing armies be competative if centurions were in the dark angels codex?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
West Michigan, deep in Whitebread, USA
|
I had thought just recently how it might make for an interesting addition to the Deathwing fluff if they used Centurions in a role as "Devastator" Terminators to balance out the "Tactical" and "Assault" variety that already exist.
Though it would probably be far better (and simpler) if the Dark Angels were simply allowed a special Deathwing Terminator squad entry that was Heavy Support, and which would include a larger number of Terminators to be equipped with heavy weapons. So for instance you could field a Sergent and 4 Cyclone Launchers. I'm honestly not sure why something like that it hasn't appeared yet.
It would also give a nice alternative for ranged tank-busting to just using the standard Dreadnought.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2013/11/22 04:57:09
"By this point I'm convinced 100% that every single race in the 40k universe have somehow tapped into the ork ability to just have their tech work because they think it should." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/22 05:27:52
Subject: Would deathwing armies be competative if centurions were in the dark angels codex?
|
 |
Perfect Shot Dark Angels Predator Pilot
|
Orock wrote:Say 3 squads of dev centurions, and then just deathwing termies marching up the field? I think it would be a lot more competitive with say 3 squads with grav guns, and the seargent with las/missles and an omniscope.
missiles or benefit from dakka banner with hurricane bolters
|
A Dark Angel fell on a watcher in the Dark Shroud silently chanted Vengance on the Fallen Angels to never be Unforgiven |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/22 20:51:50
Subject: Would deathwing armies be competative if centurions were in the dark angels codex?
|
 |
Revving Ravenwing Biker
|
Bishop F Gantry wrote: Orock wrote:Say 3 squads of dev centurions, and then just deathwing termies marching up the field? I think it would be a lot more competitive with say 3 squads with grav guns, and the seargent with las/missles and an omniscope.
missiles or benefit from dakka banner with hurricane bolters 
That ^ Dakka banner centurions hehe.
I think the reason they don't have a sort of 'heavy weapons' deathwing squad is that, frankly, deathwing are not the backbone of a Dark Angels army in a tactical sense. They have regular devastators for that duty. Deathwing are supposed to get in close, shoot, and punch and take down the hard targets while the regular marines do what regular marines do. This is just poorly translated on the tabletop sometimes. It would be very rare to see more than a few deathwing present in a battle the size of a regular 1500-2000 point skirmish I think.
- VardenV2
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/22 20:59:04
Subject: Would deathwing armies be competative if centurions were in the dark angels codex?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Ally in a squad of centurions and see how it works out. Then make sure to come back and tell us about it.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/11/22 20:59:22
I like to say I have two armies: Necrons, and Imperium.....
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/22 21:07:34
Subject: Would deathwing armies be competative if centurions were in the dark angels codex?
|
 |
Slashing Veteran Sword Bretheren
|
Dont Centurions benefit from the Dakka banner if taken as allies?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/22 21:25:29
Subject: Would deathwing armies be competative if centurions were in the dark angels codex?
|
 |
Revving Ravenwing Biker
|
Sir Arun wrote:Dont Centurions benefit from the Dakka banner if taken as allies?
I believe that the banner's rules specifically apply to Dark Angels. If not, then I am gonna be getting some psybolt ammo Inquisition LRCs haha.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/22 22:17:19
Subject: Re:Would deathwing armies be competative if centurions were in the dark angels codex?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
West Michigan, deep in Whitebread, USA
|
Ally in a squad of centurions and see how it works out. Then make sure to come back and tell us about it.
At least this would be a cool use for the Allies rules for a change. Just paint them as "Deathwing", and say that "your" version of the Deathwing includes them as a Heavy Support unit.
|
"By this point I'm convinced 100% that every single race in the 40k universe have somehow tapped into the ork ability to just have their tech work because they think it should." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/22 22:19:08
Subject: Would deathwing armies be competative if centurions were in the dark angels codex?
|
 |
Legendary Master of the Chapter
|
All friend DA only so no go. would of been awwwwsome
|
Unit1126PLL wrote: Scott-S6 wrote:And yet another thread is hijacked for Unit to ask for the same advice, receive the same answers and make the same excuses.
Oh my god I'm becoming martel.
Send help!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/23 01:36:56
Subject: Would deathwing armies be competative if centurions were in the dark angels codex?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
I think the reason they don't have a sort of 'heavy weapons' deathwing squad is that, frankly, deathwing are not the backbone of a Dark Angels army in a tactical sense. They have regular devastators for that duty. Deathwing are supposed to get in close, shoot, and punch and take down the hard targets while the regular marines do what regular marines do. This is just poorly translated on the tabletop sometimes. It would be very rare to see more than a few deathwing present in a battle the size of a regular 1500-2000 point skirmish I think.
- VardenV2
Deathwing are fighting a war that battlebrothers outside the first company would not know about. The risk that some devastator marine gets a glimpse of a fallen is reason enough for deathwing heavy weapon squads.
Id say it would be very likely for a deathwing assault to happen in a 1500 to 2000 pt range. Id guess that any more than one fallen would see the deployment of more than 30 terminators.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/23 06:58:19
Subject: Would deathwing armies be competative if centurions were in the dark angels codex?
|
 |
Long-Range Land Speeder Pilot
|
Centurions are really overrated just because they are either expensive, or they are expensive and short ranged.
I would much rather see DA get actual useful additions like point drops or a less unwieldy and more universally useful unit than simply adding in Centurions. Think more stuff like PFGs or the Banner of Devastation. The new Inquisition supplement is a big boost as well.
Centurions can't even Deep Strike or Drop Pod.
|
Hail the Emperor. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/23 08:20:37
Subject: Would deathwing armies be competative if centurions were in the dark angels codex?
|
 |
Slashing Veteran Sword Bretheren
|
Didnt most Dark Angel things already receive a points drop from 4th ed codex to the current 6th ed one?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/23 14:39:10
Subject: Re:Would deathwing armies be competative if centurions were in the dark angels codex?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
West Michigan, deep in Whitebread, USA
|
Imagine the fun of having a Terminator squad with 4 plasma cannons or 4 cyclone launchers. That's what I think Deathwing should get, and I was fully expecting it in the last codex.
|
"By this point I'm convinced 100% that every single race in the 40k universe have somehow tapped into the ork ability to just have their tech work because they think it should." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/24 09:29:47
Subject: Would deathwing armies be competative if centurions were in the dark angels codex?
|
 |
Stealthy Space Wolves Scout
Auckland, New Zealand
|
Sir Arun wrote:Didnt most Dark Angel things already receive a points drop from 4th ed codex to the current 6th ed one?
Most things, but Deathwing stayed the same or became more expensive.
|
 I am Blue/White Take The Magic Dual Colour Test - Beta today! Created with Rum and Monkey's Personality Test Generator.I'm both orderly and rational. I value control, information, and order. I love structure and hierarchy, and will actively use whatever power or knowledge I have to maintain it. At best, I am lawful and insightful; at worst, I am bureaucratic and tyrannical.

I find passive aggressive messages in people's signatures quite amusing. |
|
 |
 |
|