Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/11/02 22:29:58
Subject: Necron rumors [update: Oct 21] Dynastic army generation (Destroyer centric, Immortal centric, etc.)
|
 |
Proud Triarch Praetorian
|
Don't play with our emotions like that, man!
...
Dammit, now I have all these incredibly high expectations that will more than likely never be fulfilled... :(
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/11/02 23:45:56
Subject: Necron rumors [update: Oct 21] Dynastic army generation (Destroyer centric, Immortal centric, etc.)
|
 |
Gargantuan Gargant
|
A Gehenna Campaign box after the Necron Codex drops would be awesome.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/11/11 11:36:33
Subject: Necron rumors [update: Oct 21] Dynastic army generation (Destroyer centric, Immortal centric, etc.)
|
 |
Pyro Pilot of a Triach Stalker
|
Kangodo wrote:Even when the White Dwarf says it's named "Shield of Baal: Leviathan"?
Anpu-adom wrote:Necrons would not be in a product called, "Shield of Baal: Leviathan". Now, if it were titled "Gehenna" then yes, we would get an interesting 3 person campeign (Nids, BA, and Necrons).
I don't expect Necrons to be a part of a campaign set... just like Grey Knights haven't been in a campaign set. I do have high hopes for a set based on Sanctuary 101... because I'd buy the crap out of that set.
So "Shield of Baal: Leviathan" apparently has no Blood Angels in it. So you were saying?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/11/11 11:37:41
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/11/11 14:14:39
Subject: Necron rumors [update: Oct 21] Dynastic army generation (Destroyer centric, Immortal centric, etc.)
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
NecronLord3 wrote:Kangodo wrote:Even when the White Dwarf says it's named "Shield of Baal: Leviathan"?
Anpu-adom wrote:Necrons would not be in a product called, "Shield of Baal: Leviathan". Now, if it were titled "Gehenna" then yes, we would get an interesting 3 person campaign (Nids, BA, and Necrons).
I don't expect Necrons to be a part of a campaign set... just like Grey Knights haven't been in a campaign set. I do have high hopes for a set based on Sanctuary 101... because I'd buy the crap out of that set.
So "Shield of Baal: Leviathan" apparently has no Blood Angels in it. So you were saying?
Once again, GW defies logic, reason, and common sense. Oh, and there don't appear to be any necrons in it either.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/11/11 16:24:02
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/11/11 14:30:24
Subject: Necron rumors [update: Oct 21] Dynastic army generation (Destroyer centric, Immortal centric, etc.)
|
 |
Pragmatic Primus Commanding Cult Forces
|
There will be a second campaign book.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/11/11 14:38:04
Subject: Necron rumors [update: Oct 21] Dynastic army generation (Destroyer centric, Immortal centric, etc.)
|
 |
Trazyn's Museum Curator
|
skoffs wrote: Don't play with our emotions like that, man!
...
Dammit, now I have all these incredibly high expectations that will more than likely never be fulfilled... :(
You know what would be awesome about a sanctury 101 box set?
Plastic sisters.
Then I can start a new army and reinforce my existing one
|
What I have
~4100
~1660
Westwood lives in death!
Peace through power!
A longbeard when it comes to Necrons and WHFB. Grumble Grumble
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/11/11 16:12:05
Subject: Necron rumors [update: Oct 21] Dynastic army generation (Destroyer centric, Immortal centric, etc.)
|
 |
Proud Triarch Praetorian
|
CthuluIsSpy wrote: skoffs wrote: Don't play with our emotions like that, man!
...
Dammit, now I have all these incredibly high expectations that will more than likely never be fulfilled... :(
You know what would be awesome about a sanctury 101 box set?
Plastic sisters.
S-stop!
Just... just stop...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/11/11 16:58:54
Subject: Necron rumors [update: Oct 21] Dynastic army generation (Destroyer centric, Immortal centric, etc.)
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
adamsouza wrote:A Gehenna Campaign box after the Necron Codex drops would be awesome.
WARNING: TOTAL WISHLISTING... THE MOST APPROPRIATE RESPONSE IS TO NOD YOU HEAD AND PRETEND THIS POST DIDN'T HAPPEN
I would rather have Sanctuary 101, but let's compare:
Gehenna for Necrons
Established Fluff places the Silent King as head of the army...
Praetorian formation that makes them worth taking (Outside of Apoc... and I'm not even sure if the Apoc formation is worth taking)
Space Time manipulation from the necrons in the fluff... how would that work on the table top?
Sanctuary 101
I'm taking most of this from the book Hammer and Anvil...
BA Overlord and a scheming Cryptek... great limited edition models
Overlord riding a Monolith. (suck on that Logan Grimnar)
Flayed One formation
Loose and retake story line... something GW seems to love
Oh, and plastic sisters
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/11/11 17:19:36
Subject: Necron rumors [update: Oct 21] Dynastic army generation (Destroyer centric, Immortal centric, etc.)
|
 |
Proud Triarch Praetorian
|
CONTINUING THIS WHOLE WISHLISTING THING THAT NEVER HAPPENED.
Let me add some speculation:
• LoWG source says 40k codex release goes BA, Necrons, then "codex no one is expecting"
• leak says Baal: Leviathan (assumed to be part one of multi part campaign, like Storm Claw) will involve 'Nid, Guard, a bit of Sisters, and eventually BA.
• ... could this mystery codex no one is expecting be none other than the Sisters?
• if they're making their comeback, would it not be feasible that the next campaign after Baal: Leviathan could be Necrons and Sisters?
REMINDER: THE ABOVE WISHLIST/SPECULATION DID NOT HAPPEN. CONTINUE NODDING AND GOING ABOUT YOUR BUSINESS.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/11/11 17:46:20
Subject: Re:Necron rumors [update: Oct 21] Dynastic army generation (Destroyer centric, Immortal centric, etc.)
|
 |
Gargantuan Gargant
|
Considering Adepta Señoritas are about the only army GW is still slinging in Failcast, and that GW hasn't squatted them, it's not hard to imagine them finally getting around to giving them an in print codex and a new plastic line.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/11/11 17:48:12
Subject: Re:Necron rumors [update: Oct 21] Dynastic army generation (Destroyer centric, Immortal centric, etc.)
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
adamsouza wrote:Considering Adepta Señoritas are about the only army GW is still slinging in Failcast, and that GW hasn't squatted them, it's not hard to imagine them finally getting around to giving them an in print codex and a new plastic line.
When you're wrong, you're super wrong... Tell me... How many Finecast Sisters of Battle does GW produce exactly?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/11/11 17:57:17
Subject: Necron rumors [update: Oct 21] Dynastic army generation (Destroyer centric, Immortal centric, etc.)
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
NecronLord3 wrote:Kangodo wrote:Even when the White Dwarf says it's named "Shield of Baal: Leviathan"?
Anpu-adom wrote:Necrons would not be in a product called, "Shield of Baal: Leviathan". Now, if it were titled "Gehenna" then yes, we would get an interesting 3 person campeign (Nids, BA, and Necrons).
I don't expect Necrons to be a part of a campaign set... just like Grey Knights haven't been in a campaign set. I do have high hopes for a set based on Sanctuary 101... because I'd buy the crap out of that set.
So "Shield of Baal: Leviathan" apparently has no Blood Angels in it. So you were saying?
Sanctus Reach's first book had no Space Wolves in it.
It was Guard and Knights v. Orks.
The campaign box was then Space Wolves v. Orks and Book II was Wolves and Grey Knights v. Orks
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/11/11 18:00:54
Subject: Necron rumors [update: Oct 21] Dynastic army generation (Destroyer centric, Immortal centric, etc.)
|
 |
Trazyn's Museum Curator
|
Anpu-adom wrote: adamsouza wrote:A Gehenna Campaign box after the Necron Codex drops would be awesome.
WARNING: TOTAL WISHLISTING... THE MOST APPROPRIATE RESPONSE IS TO NOD YOU HEAD AND PRETEND THIS POST DIDN'T HAPPEN
I would rather have Sanctuary 101, but let's compare:
Gehenna for Necrons
Established Fluff places the Silent King as head of the army...
Praetorian formation that makes them worth taking (Outside of Apoc... and I'm not even sure if the Apoc formation is worth taking)
Space Time manipulation from the necrons in the fluff... how would that work on the table top?
Sanctuary 101
I'm taking most of this from the book Hammer and Anvil...
BA Overlord and a scheming Cryptek... great limited edition models
Overlord riding a Monolith. (suck on that Logan Grimnar)
Flayed One formation
Loose and retake story line... something GW seems to love
Oh, and plastic sisters
A monolith being pulled by smaller monoliths, in true GW fashion
|
What I have
~4100
~1660
Westwood lives in death!
Peace through power!
A longbeard when it comes to Necrons and WHFB. Grumble Grumble
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/11/11 19:48:03
Subject: Re:Necron rumors [update: Oct 21] Dynastic army generation (Destroyer centric, Immortal centric, etc.)
|
 |
Gargantuan Gargant
|
pretre wrote: adamsouza wrote:Considering Adepta Señoritas are about the only army GW is still slinging in Failcast, and that GW hasn't squatted them, it's not hard to imagine them finally getting around to giving them an in print codex and a new plastic line.
When you're wrong, you're super wrong... Tell me... How many Finecast Sisters of Battle does GW produce exactly?
So shoot me, I didn't think GW made anything in metal these days.
Considering Adepta Sororitas are about the only army GW is still slinging in metal, and that GW hasn't squatted them, it's not hard to imagine them finally getting around to giving them an in print codex and a new plastic line.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/11/11 19:59:03
Subject: Necron rumors [update: Oct 21] Dynastic army generation (Destroyer centric, Immortal centric, etc.)
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Brets are still metal and, if I'm not mistaken, so are a good chunk of AM.
Making a habit of this, aren't you?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/11/12 14:52:53
Subject: Necron rumors [update: Oct 21] Dynastic army generation (Destroyer centric, Immortal centric, etc.)
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
Don't feel bad, adamsouza... Pretre is grumpy in the morning. And in the afternoon... and just about every time.
Both 40k and Fantasy are at interesting times... It looks like the Fantasy range is going to undergo major changes... including changes to the Bretonnians. There appears to be progress on the Chapterhouse Lawsuit, and long rumored Nid models have seen the light of day. They have moved their COO unto the CEO position... maybe that have the idea that a plastic Sisters release would be as big as an updated DE, Necron, or Tau release.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/11/12 14:59:43
Subject: Necron rumors [update: Oct 21] Dynastic army generation (Destroyer centric, Immortal centric, etc.)
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
pretre wrote:Brets are still metal and, if I'm not mistaken, so are a good chunk of AM.
Wood Elves still have a large number of character models and a single unit in the form of Waywatchers in all metal still...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/11/12 15:23:31
Subject: Necron rumors [update: Oct 21] Dynastic army generation (Destroyer centric, Immortal centric, etc.)
|
 |
Sword-Bearing Inquisitorial Crusader
|
pretre wrote:Brets are still metal and, if I'm not mistaken, so are a good chunk of AM.
Making a habit of this, aren't you? 
Let's talk with the hole we eat with, not with the one we sit on please.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/11/12 15:48:37
Subject: Necron rumors [update: Oct 21] Dynastic army generation (Destroyer centric, Immortal centric, etc.)
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Anpu-adom wrote:Don't feel bad, adamsouza... Pretre is grumpy in the morning. And in the afternoon... and just about every time.
Not grumpy. I just don't like incorrect statements.
Kanluwen wrote:Wood Elves still have a large number of character models and a single unit in the form of Waywatchers in all metal still...
Aha, missed some.
Neronoxx wrote:Let's talk with the hole we eat with, not with the one we sit on please.
I'm sorry, was I incorrect?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/11/12 15:54:43
Subject: Necron rumors [update: Oct 21] Dynastic army generation (Destroyer centric, Immortal centric, etc.)
|
 |
Haemonculi Flesh Apprentice
|
Your attitude was and usually is, yes.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/11/12 16:14:51
Subject: Necron rumors [update: Oct 21] Dynastic army generation (Destroyer centric, Immortal centric, etc.)
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/11/12 16:59:24
Subject: Necron rumors [update: Oct 21] Dynastic army generation (Destroyer centric, Immortal centric, etc.)
|
 |
Proud Triarch Praetorian
|
... seriously?
Are we seriously about to have an internet fight on the Necron Rumors thread?
(I'd expect this kind of behavior on YMDC, but News and Rumors?)
Possible alternatives:
• develop thicker internet skin
• don't be such a meanie, you big meanie
• take it private
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/11/12 17:17:16
Subject: Necron rumors [update: Oct 21] Dynastic army generation (Destroyer centric, Immortal centric, etc.)
|
 |
Infiltrating Broodlord
|
I would probably suggest a mod locks this thread as there are no rumours on here, only wish listing and pointless conversation.
Re-open the thread when real leaks/ rumours come out.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/11/12 17:25:41
Subject: Necron rumors [update: Oct 21] Dynastic army generation (Destroyer centric, Immortal centric, etc.)
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
That's what the little yellow triangle is for.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/11/12 17:27:33
Subject: Re:Necron rumors [update: Oct 21] Dynastic army generation (Destroyer centric, Immortal centric, etc.)
|
 |
[DCM]
Et In Arcadia Ego
|
No news or info.
|
The poor man really has a stake in the country. The rich man hasn't; he can go away to New Guinea in a yacht. The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all
We love our superheroes because they refuse to give up on us. We can analyze them out of existence, kill them, ban them, mock them, and still they return, patiently reminding us of who we are and what we wish we could be.
"the play's the thing wherein I'll catch the conscience of the king, |
|
 |
 |
|