Ensis Ferrae wrote:
Seriously though.... who WOULDN'T vote for Morgan Freeman and Samuel L. Jackson??

I mean, one's got the voice of God, and the other will set gak straight in a way that everyone can understand.

 Do_I_Not_Like_That wrote:

 Ensis Ferrae wrote:
Seriously though.... who WOULDN'T vote for Morgan Freeman and Samuel L. Jackson??

I mean, one's got the voice of God, and the other will set gak straight in a way that everyone can understand.

Even those two would be no match for a Congressional oversight committee. No force on earth can stop one of them

 Frazzled wrote:
First Clinton Flack takes the Fifth. I wonder if they will be the first to roll.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/03/politics/clinton-aide-fifth-amendment-emails/index.html

 Frazzled wrote:
Its official, HRC pleads the Fifth.
http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/09/03/437193853/former-clinton-aide-who-built-private-email-server-pleads-the-5th

Exposed! Libya Security Briefs, Algeria Hostage Info & More — Hacker Threatens To Sell Hillary Clinton’s ENTIRE UNRELEASED Private Emails For $500K

Just as email-gate looked to be winding down, RadarOnline.com has exclusively learned a person claiming to be a computer specialist has come forward with the stunning news that 32,000 emails from Hillary Clinton‘s private email account are up for sale. The price tag — a whopping $500,000!

Promising to give the trove of the former Secretary of State’s emails to the highest bidder, the specialist is showing subject lines as proof of what appear to be legitimate messages.

PHOTOS: Exposed! 10 New Revelations From Hillary Clinton’s Recently Released Emails — Overworked Staff And Guilty Pleasures!

“Hillary or someone from her camp erased the outbox containing her emails, but forgot to erase the emails that were in her sent box,” an insider reveals to Radar of the Presidential contender’s latest nightmare.

Radar has learned that some of the topics discussed in the email appear to include everything from Benghazi to the Algerian hostage crisis — with subject lines such as:

“H Libya security latest. Sid” (with attachment)
“H FYI, best analysis so far of hearing Sid,’ about the latest security
in Libya”
“H Algeria latest French Intel on Algeria hostage Sid”
“H Latest French Intel in Algeria hostage Sid” (with attachment)
“H Latest Libya intel internal govt discussions high level” (with
attachment)
“H HIGHLY IMPORTANT! Comprehensive Intel Report on (with attachment)”

Warns the insider, “If these emails get out to the public domain, not only is Hillary finished as a potential Presidential nominee, she could put our country’s national security at risk.”

Hillary or someone from her camp erased the outbox containing her emails, but forgot to erase the emails that were in her sent box

 CptJake wrote:

Hillary or someone from her camp erased the outbox containing her emails, but forgot to erase the emails that were in her sent box

Yeah, because most email servers maintain a full outbox and don't automatically delete from it and put the email into the sent box.


Whoever wrote the article does not seem too educated on the topic.

 whembly wrote:

 CptJake wrote:

Hillary or someone from her camp erased the outbox containing her emails, but forgot to erase the emails that were in her sent box

Yeah, because most email servers maintain a full outbox and don't automatically delete from it and put the email into the sent box.


Whoever wrote the article does not seem too educated on the topic.

Huh...?

Outbox 'are' traditionally maintained and archived. However, if we truly believed that HRC staff tried to "wiped" the server... I'd have a hard time believing that they'd miss the archived/sent folders as well.

I'm just waiting to see if the FBI will acknowledge if they did indeed, received a batch of emails from this hacker. I'd give it a 1% chance...

 CptJake wrote:

 whembly wrote:

 CptJake wrote:

Hillary or someone from her camp erased the outbox containing her emails, but forgot to erase the emails that were in her sent box

Yeah, because most email servers maintain a full outbox and don't automatically delete from it and put the email into the sent box.


Whoever wrote the article does not seem too educated on the topic.

Huh...?

Outbox 'are' traditionally maintained and archived. However, if we truly believed that HRC staff tried to "wiped" the server... I'd have a hard time believing that they'd miss the archived/sent folders as well.

I'm just waiting to see if the FBI will acknowledge if they did indeed, received a batch of emails from this hacker. I'd give it a 1% chance...

I'm pretty sure the 'sent' and 'draft' make the archives. 'Outbox' generally empties out when a connection to the net is made, and in most cases that is a continuous connection so even though the whole .pst (or enterprise equivalent) is archived, the 'outbox' portion of it is generally pretty vacant.

 LordofHats wrote:
Also arguably the nail in his campaign. He will continue to make noise, but is a back door admission by Trump and the Party that he is not going to be the nominee.

 LordofHats wrote:
Also arguably the nail in his campaign. He will continue to make noise, but is a back door admission by Trump and the Party that he is not going to be the nominee.

 Ouze wrote:
Yeah, I don't at all see it as him giving up. Why should he? The competition sucks.

 Co'tor Shas wrote:
Meh, I think he has a chance, especially if none of the less popular ones drop out, pulling the vote away from the real competitors. Not a big chance mind you, but a chance nevertheless.

In an exclusive interview with NBC News/MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell on Friday, Hillary Clinton said she's "sorry" there's been so much controversy over her private email server, but declined to apologize for the decision to use it. She also suggested that GOP front-runner Donald Trump is unqualified to be president and weighed in on the surprisingly robust challenge to her candidacy from Democratic primary rival Bernie Sanders.

"At the end of the day, I am sorry that this has been confusing to people and has raised a lot of questions, but there are answers to all these questions," Clinton said of her email server after being pressed by Mitchell on whether she should apologize for the controversy that has dogged her campaign from the outset. "And I take responsibility and it wasn't the best choice."

It was just the third nationally televised interview for Clinton, the former secretary of state and Democratic 2016 front-runner, since announcing her campaign in April. Beset by flagging approval ratings, the Sanders challenge and the possibility that Vice President Joe Biden may enter the race, Clinton's interview with Mitchell appeared to be part of her campaign's latest effort to offer more access to the candidate.

Yet as her own campaign chairman John Podesta acknowledged in a conference call with reporters Thursday, Clinton's campaign has faced "headwinds" since March, when her private email server was first revealed. Her poll numbers have fallen as the number of people who consider her untrustworthy has risen.

"Certainly, it doesn't make me feel good," Clinton said when asked by Mitchell about those who find her dishonest. "But I am very confident that by the time this campaign has run its course, people will know that what I have been saying is accurate."

After laughing off questions about her server for months, Clinton has begun to strike a more contrite tone.

She explained that she had used a personal email account as a senator from New York and didn't spend much time considering alternatives when she became secretary of state in 2009. "I did all my business on my personal email [in the Senate]," Clinton said. "I was not thinking a lot when I got in [to the State Department]. There was so much work to be done. We had so many problems around the world. I didn't really stop and think what kind of email system will there be."

"This was fully above board, people knew I was using a personal email, I did it for convenience. I sent emails that I thought were work related to people's dot gov accounts," she added.

Asked by Mitchell about Trump's attacks on longtime Clinton aide Huma Abedin, Clinton said the Republican's candidacy is "a bad development for our American political system" and that his bravado could have dangerous repercussions if he became president.

"Loose talk, threats, insults -- they have consequences," she said. "The president of the United States needs to be careful about what he or she says.

She went to say that Trump is "great at innuendo and conspiracy theories and really defaming people."

"He is the candidate of being against," she continued.

Trump and fellow Republican candidate Ted Cruz will hold a rally opposing President Barack Obama's nuclear agreement with Iran next week at the same time Clinton will be defending it in a speech in Washington. Asked about that, Clinton suggested that Trump and Cruz "don't believe in diplomacy" and said Americans want a president who does.

Clinton planned to deliver remarks on the Iran deal next week in Washington. "It is by no means perfect, but it's an important step," Clinton told Mitchell, adding that Iran "can never, ever have a nuclear weapon."

The Democratic front-runner has avoided getting into tangles with her primary opponents, and refused to weigh in on the political ramifications of Vice President Joe Biden's potential decision to the enter race.

But asked about why voters find Biden and challenger Bernie Sanders more authentic than Clinton, the former secretary of state seemed to take subtle dig at Sanders. "I started out listening because I think you can come with your own ideas and you can wave your arms and give a speech, but at the end of the day, are you connecting with and really hearing?" she said.

Aides have promised that Clinton in the coming weeks would take on a greater focus on women and stress her own role as a potential woman president. She appeared to make good on that promise with Mitchell, saying her candidacy was part of an career-long commitment to help women and girls around the world.

"My running for president is a way of sending a message -- we have an opportunity to lift up everyone," Clinton said.

 angelofvengeance wrote:
What's the likelihood of you guys having Donald Trump for president?

 whembly wrote:

Soooo... do we really want a president who admits that she “was not thinking a lot” about the national security implications of her email conduct as SoS??

 whembly wrote:


Soooo... do we really want a president who admits that she “was not thinking a lot” about the national security implications of her email conduct as SoS??