Poll |
 |
|
 |
Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/07 19:51:35
Subject: What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Ruthless Interrogator
|
Personally I think that in today's current meta terminators are a meh unit for their price and they could definitely use some changes.( personally I think they should be t5 with 2 wounds but I'm biased  )
How do you guys think they should be fixed? I want to see what dakkas proposed rules forumites say what would make them a viable unit again.
|
Space Marines: Jacks of all trades yet masters of GRAV CANNONS!!!.
My Star Wars Imperial Codex Project: http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/641831.page
It has 7 HQs, 2 Troop types with Dedicated Transports, 5 Elite units, 5 Fast Attack units, 6 Heavy Support units, 2 Formations with unique units not in the rest of the codex, and 2 LOW choices.
‘I do not care who knows the truth now, tomorrow, or in ten thousand years. Loyalty is its own reward.’ -Lion El' Jonson |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/07 20:04:22
Subject: What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Steady Space Marine Vet Sergeant
England
|
I would just drop them a few points, and leave them at that. Centurions were created for T5 goodness and 2 wounds so if ya do that, you're making centurions pointless. Termies are not the greatest unit because they struggle to make their points back, and one bad dice roll is the end of your teminators. 5+ invuln isn't gonna save you either, mabye save 1 or 2 termies.
Rereading this, I'm saying you should drop termies a few points and give them SOMETHING to make them slightly less squishy like a better invuln or even better a FNP. Hope this helps Automatically Appended Next Post: I would just drop them a few points, and leave them at that. Centurions were created for T5 goodness and 2 wounds so if ya do that, you're making centurions pointless. Termies are not the greatest unit because they struggle to make their points back, and one bad dice roll is the end of your teminators. 5+ invuln isn't gonna save you either, mabye save 1 or 2 termies.
Rereading this, I'm saying you should drop termies a few points and give them SOMETHING to make them slightly less squishy like a better invuln or even better a FNP. Hope this helps
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/02/07 20:05:18
If you can't believe in yourself, believe in me! Believe in the Dakka who believes in you! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/07 20:06:05
Subject: What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Locked in the Tower of Amareo
|
Give shooty terminators real firepower. Make them like Eldar Warwalkers in terms of fire power and let them all have assault cannons. If they can actually hurt their opponent, they don't NEED any extra durability, because their opponent will be dead! As it stands now, they are mighty armor suits with pop guns. Ignorable, and pathetic.
|
This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2015/02/07 20:08:12
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/07 21:31:45
Subject: What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Lone Wolf Sentinel Pilot
|
Martel732 wrote:Give shooty terminators real firepower. Make them like Eldar Warwalkers in terms of fire power and let them all have assault cannons. If they can actually hurt their opponent, they don't NEED any extra durability, because their opponent will be dead! As it stands now, they are mighty armor suits with pop guns. Ignorable, and pathetic.
2 special weapons per 5 would be reasonable. I think 5 AC is just a tad much firepower to be able to DS (turn 1 guaranteed for DA). Jeez, or 5+ CML with a few SS out front.
Outside of that, T5 would make sense and would mildly boost survivability. Upping wounds however is a bit overkill, unless you also jack the points up (paladins). I'd rather have better terminators at the same price than crappy terminators at a lower price.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/07 22:00:05
Subject: What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Tail-spinning Tomb Blade Pilot
In a chair, staring at a screen
|
Id give them a 3+ armour save, 2+ seems way to OP
|
1500 pts
2000pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/07 22:40:10
Subject: What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Ruthless Interrogator
|
Why would they have a 3+ save? Then they'd be regular meq with deepstrike. Increasing their invul gives you less reason to take a storm shield( why pay 15 points for a 3+ when you have a 4+ for free) and if you did that then the price of the stormshield would have to drop by probably 5 ppm.
Giving them the options to take more heavy weapons is a definite way to improve them essentially making them devastators that are actually worth taking.
|
Space Marines: Jacks of all trades yet masters of GRAV CANNONS!!!.
My Star Wars Imperial Codex Project: http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/641831.page
It has 7 HQs, 2 Troop types with Dedicated Transports, 5 Elite units, 5 Fast Attack units, 6 Heavy Support units, 2 Formations with unique units not in the rest of the codex, and 2 LOW choices.
‘I do not care who knows the truth now, tomorrow, or in ten thousand years. Loyalty is its own reward.’ -Lion El' Jonson |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/07 22:48:17
Subject: What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Locked in the Tower of Amareo
|
kingbobbito wrote:Martel732 wrote:Give shooty terminators real firepower. Make them like Eldar Warwalkers in terms of fire power and let them all have assault cannons. If they can actually hurt their opponent, they don't NEED any extra durability, because their opponent will be dead! As it stands now, they are mighty armor suits with pop guns. Ignorable, and pathetic.
2 special weapons per 5 would be reasonable. I think 5 AC is just a tad much firepower to be able to DS (turn 1 guaranteed for DA). Jeez, or 5+ CML with a few SS out front.
Outside of that, T5 would make sense and would mildly boost survivability. Upping wounds however is a bit overkill, unless you also jack the points up (paladins). I'd rather have better terminators at the same price than crappy terminators at a lower price.
It seems okay for Xenos lists to throw around that many shots. 2 special per 5 is still crap firepower.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/07 23:00:50
Subject: What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Using Inks and Washes
St. George, Utah
|
The biggest problem with terminators is they are a close combat unit that struggles in close combat. The weapon terminators have that make them so costly is the power fist/twin lightning claws, so points-wise they are fine. It's just that after deep striking, you're going to get shot up. If you want a combat delivery vehicle, you're looking at paying another 240 points just for the ability to do so. Power Fist terminators being unwieldy to the last means they tend to lose a guy or two before getting to attack. Even when you win combat, terminators and any IC attached to them cannot sweeping advance so you HAVE to do all your killing before a unit runs away, or they get another turn to shoot at you.
All that means they are incredibly inefficient for what they theoretically should do best. If they dropped the sweeping advance restriction, terminators would immediately have more value on the table.
That's why I've said this edition, outside of Grey Knights, the best terminators are Space Wolves purely because they are significantly cheaper, and you're not locked in to unwieldy weapons, and you've got the best combat delivery system with them of any of the space marine books in they can just be deployed via Drop Pods.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/08 01:49:34
Subject: Re:What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Paramount Plague Censer Bearer
|
After looking at what happened to Lychguard and Praetorians.
Reduce Assault Terminators price to 32 points, still 5 points to upgrade to TH/SS.
Reduce Tactical Terminators price to 27 points, but replace their Power Fists with choice of Power Weapon. Power Fists being a 5 point upgrade and Chainfists becoming an 8 point upgrade.
Let both take Drop Pods.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/02/08 01:50:03
My win rate while having my arms and legs tied behind by back while blindfolded and stuffed in a safe that is submerged underwater:
100% |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/08 03:14:03
Subject: What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Trigger-Happy Baal Predator Pilot
|
I'd give them +1 strength and toughness, the ability for normal terminators to take combi-weapons (assault 2), the ability to take drop pods as a dedicated transport and either +1 wound or a special rule that says that terminator armour grants a 2+ armour save that is only negated by AP1 weapons (Too OP?).
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/08 03:41:15
Subject: What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Ruthless Interrogator
|
I think the ap1 thing is op( kinda odd too).
|
Space Marines: Jacks of all trades yet masters of GRAV CANNONS!!!.
My Star Wars Imperial Codex Project: http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/641831.page
It has 7 HQs, 2 Troop types with Dedicated Transports, 5 Elite units, 5 Fast Attack units, 6 Heavy Support units, 2 Formations with unique units not in the rest of the codex, and 2 LOW choices.
‘I do not care who knows the truth now, tomorrow, or in ten thousand years. Loyalty is its own reward.’ -Lion El' Jonson |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/08 03:52:07
Subject: What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Speed Drybrushing
|
Martel732 wrote:Give shooty terminators real firepower. Make them like Eldar Warwalkers in terms of fire power and let them all have assault cannons. If they can actually hurt their opponent, they don't NEED any extra durability, because their opponent will be dead! As it stands now, they are mighty armor suits with pop guns. Ignorable, and pathetic.
This is what they need, the ability to do something in the game.
5 terminators with 5 assault cannons would cost 325 pts, but it would not be ignored
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/08 04:06:43
Subject: What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Sybarite Swinging an Agonizer
|
I think there should be a rule similar to Relentless that allows certain units to ignore unwieldly. I know MC's do, but when you see a Terminator unloading an auto cannon as he moves, then charging, or better yet his missile launcher(these things should have crazy recoil) it bewilders me that they can't swing a hammer or throw their fists with the same enthusiasm.
|
10k+ Tau, Ke'lshan
10k Dark Eldar Kabal of the Flayed skull
1k Scions
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/08 04:13:19
Subject: What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Tunneling Trygon
|
Increase their points and make the armor save rerollable. This includes the Invulnerable but doesn't change the number. Against normal weapons they get two chances for 2+ and against AP2 or 1 they get two chances to make 5+. Add in another 15-20pts per model and we have a very rare unit that is overpowered as the fluff but not good enough to be an auto-take.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/08 04:15:22
Subject: What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Frenzied Berserker Terminator
|
Seems we all have our own ideas about terminators, lol!
I think we could do this, and it would work. The goal is to make terminators a bit more competitive, without going over the top or straying from the fluff.
Make terminator armour save a 3+ on 2d6 when faced with wounds that do not cause instant death. Against wounds that cause ID, the normal 2+. This way terminators are more resilient to small arms fire, but can still be put down by high str, low ap.
Also, to fix the fluff problem, give terminators greater access to the armoury. These guys are e best right? Why limit their choices? Hey, you are such a good space marine, you get to wear the fancy armour, but you can't have any cool toys. Doesn't make sense. Instead of giving them p fists, drop the points cost by 5 points and give them power weapons. Add an option for the powerfist for 5 points, and chain for 10. This keeps a basic p fist termie the same cost, but allows us to choose power weapons or power fists.
These two things I think, would make terminators viable, or at least make tactical terminators more appealing. In fact with changes such as this, you could ostensibly cut out assault terminators and merge them wi tacticals. But then you wouldn't need two kits to make the ones you wanted...
|
Gets along better with animals... Go figure. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/08 05:13:08
Subject: What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
|
Start at 35 with a power sword, give them two heavy weapons per five guys, and pump the base Inv to 4+. Simple, not silly, efficient, effective.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/08 18:55:41
Subject: What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Lone Wolf Sentinel Pilot
|
darkcloak wrote:Make terminator armour save a 3+ on 2d6 when faced with wounds that do not cause instant death. Against wounds that cause ID, the normal 2+. This way terminators are more resilient to small arms fire, but can still be put down by high str, low ap.
While this would have the effect of making terminators a bit beefier, it'd also mean a feth ton of rolling. Let's say that terminator squad took 10 wounds from a blob of guard. Since each save is 2d6, you need to either have 10 pairs of different dice, or roll each wound separately. It'd be a lot faster to just reroll fails.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/08 21:37:46
Subject: What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
|
kingbobbito wrote:darkcloak wrote:Make terminator armour save a 3+ on 2d6 when faced with wounds that do not cause instant death. Against wounds that cause ID, the normal 2+. This way terminators are more resilient to small arms fire, but can still be put down by high str, low ap.
While this would have the effect of making terminators a bit beefier, it'd also mean a feth ton of rolling. Let's say that terminator squad took 10 wounds from a blob of guard. Since each save is 2d6, you need to either have 10 pairs of different dice, or roll each wound separately. It'd be a lot faster to just reroll fails.
I used 2d6 in an early draft of Aegis, it quickly became apparent that it's completely infeasible on 40k's scale.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/09 04:54:10
Subject: Re:What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
!!Goffik Rocker!!
|
Count them as wraiths.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/09 04:59:02
Subject: Re:What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Locked in the Tower of Amareo
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/09 12:33:40
Subject: Re:What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Ruthless Interrogator
|
|
Space Marines: Jacks of all trades yet masters of GRAV CANNONS!!!.
My Star Wars Imperial Codex Project: http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/641831.page
It has 7 HQs, 2 Troop types with Dedicated Transports, 5 Elite units, 5 Fast Attack units, 6 Heavy Support units, 2 Formations with unique units not in the rest of the codex, and 2 LOW choices.
‘I do not care who knows the truth now, tomorrow, or in ten thousand years. Loyalty is its own reward.’ -Lion El' Jonson |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/09 12:44:27
Subject: Re:What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Veteran Wolf Guard Squad Leader
|
This has come up a lot in recent threads. Imo the best thing to do justice to them would be to change them to 2+ 4++. Then to keep the storm shield viable -give it hammer of wrath, or make it a specialist weapon. Changing the storm bolter to Assault 3 would be a good thing too. All this with appropriate point increases of course. While the power of termies have been poorly represented on the tabletop pretty much since 3rd, I''m not in favour of giving them extra wounds and toughness boosts as this is getting into monstrous creature territory (and walkers that are incorrectly categorised as MC's!)
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2015/02/09 20:26:19
I let the dogs out |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/09 12:47:15
Subject: What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Auspicious Skink Shaman
Louth, Ireland
|
give them 3+ on 2d6 like it should be. AP 3 knocks this to 4+ on 2d6 ap 2 knocks to 5+ ap 1 to 6+
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/09 15:02:45
Subject: What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Lone Wolf Sentinel Pilot
|
Soteks Prophet wrote:give them 3+ on 2d6 like it should be. AP 3 knocks this to 4+ on 2d6 ap 2 knocks to 5+ ap 1 to 6+
Again, that's just too complicated. See how long that takes to roll out if you take 10 wounds... no one wants to individually roll 10 pairs of dice... depending on how you do it, it could take 10 times longer. Now look at a Deathwing only army and you've just added another half hour to the game just for rolling saves
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/09 15:05:37
Subject: What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Ancient Space Wolves Venerable Dreadnought
I... actually don't know. Help?
|
T5. They're supposed to be invincible killing machines.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/09 15:08:45
Subject: What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
|
Soteks Prophet wrote:give them 3+ on 2d6 like it should be. AP 3 knocks this to 4+ on 2d6 ap 2 knocks to 5+ ap 1 to 6+
How long is it going to take you to roll all those saves on 2d6 when someone FRF/SRFs two hundred twin-linked lasgun shots at you? (Lasguns or no lasguns that's still fifty saves)
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/09 16:04:48
Subject: What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Unbalanced Fanatic
|
Improve Storm Bolter to Assault 3 and give them all Feel No Pain so they would generally get 2 "Saves" vs. most Wounds. Might have to up their cost slightly at that point though.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/09 16:26:19
Subject: What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Locked in the Tower of Amareo
|
Assault 3 is a non-upgrade, because the shots are still very weak.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/09 16:36:38
Subject: What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
|
Martel732 wrote:Assault 3 is a non-upgrade, because the shots are still very weak.
Two heavy weapons per five. Better guns.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/09 16:49:24
Subject: What would you change for terminators?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
T5 and access to grav weapons.
|
|
 |
 |
|