Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/31 02:08:01
Subject: Flayed Ones
|
 |
Slashing Veteran Sword Bretheren
|
If Flayed ones didn't have shred and were troops, would they be worth taking?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/31 04:31:23
Subject: Flayed Ones
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
They shouldn't be troops, unless there was a Flayed One supplement and you could play Overlords that were also succumbing to it. Otherwise, Necrons refuse to be near, respect, or use Flayed Ones. Therefor, why would they be the core of the army? Also, Shred is the one thing that made them good, as they were easily one of the worst units in the game in their previous incarnation.
|
40k:
8th Edtion: 9405 pts - Varantekh Dynasty |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/31 04:53:13
Subject: Flayed Ones
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Why would you take Flayed Ones in a shooty edition when you've got Warriors who cost the same but have a gun and can take a transport?
As stated, Shred is the very thing that makes them good.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/03/31 04:53:34
YMDC = nightmare |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/31 05:04:33
Subject: Flayed Ones
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
|
Who isn't taking Flayed Ones? Flayed Ones are great.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/31 06:42:39
Subject: Flayed Ones
|
 |
Slashing Veteran Sword Bretheren
|
krodarklorr wrote:They shouldn't be troops, unless there was a Flayed One supplement and you could play Overlords that were also succumbing to it. Otherwise, Necrons refuse to be near, respect, or use Flayed Ones. Therefor, why would they be the core of the army? Also, Shred is the one thing that made them good, as they were easily one of the worst units in the game in their previous incarnation.
It would be fluffy for players wanting to play tomb worlds affected by the flayer virus. Flayed Ones are supposed to be infected rank and file, not "elite" soldiers in any way.
Also they didnt just gain shred, but +1 attack and AP5 on their claws. If you now add to the fact that we have deepstriking objective secured units available for cheapo points, it's still quite lucrative to use them as core to just drown the opponent in deepstriking bodies and snag his objectives that way, since they need to be utterly annihilated for him to relaim that objective.
|
This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2015/03/31 06:44:08
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/31 06:49:40
Subject: Flayed Ones
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
Sir Arun wrote: krodarklorr wrote:They shouldn't be troops, unless there was a Flayed One supplement and you could play Overlords that were also succumbing to it. Otherwise, Necrons refuse to be near, respect, or use Flayed Ones. Therefor, why would they be the core of the army? Also, Shred is the one thing that made them good, as they were easily one of the worst units in the game in their previous incarnation. It would be fluffy for players wanting to play tomb worlds affected by the flayer virus. Flayed Ones are supposed to be infected rank and file, not "elite" soldiers in any way. Also they didnt just gain shred, but +1 attack and AP5 on their claws. If you now add to the fact that we have deepstriking objective secured units available for cheapo points, it's still quite lucrative to use them as core to just drown the opponent in deepstriking bodies and snag his objectives that way, since they need to be utterly annihilated for him to relaim that objective. Which is why I mentioned the supplement for it. Under most circumstances, however, Flayed Ones are not used by Overlords. Also, who would you be using Obj Sec anyway? Decurion. So them being troops wouldn't really benefit anyway.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/03/31 07:06:37
40k:
8th Edtion: 9405 pts - Varantekh Dynasty |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/02 06:59:57
Subject: Re:Flayed Ones
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
unless there was a Flayed One supplement and you could play Overlords that were also succumbing to it
But there is such a supplement )
From Forge World. It is Imperial Armour (12, i think) -Fall of Orpheus
It has Overlords succumbing to madness, Flayed Ones as ttroops - and you can even give them shred (single-use, though)
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/02 07:20:20
Subject: Re:Flayed Ones
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
Survivor19 wrote:unless there was a Flayed One supplement and you could play Overlords that were also succumbing to it
But there is such a supplement )
From Forge World. It is Imperial Armour (12, i think) -Fall of Orpheus
It has Overlords succumbing to madness, Flayed Ones as ttroops - and you can even give them shred (single-use, though)
Yes, this is true. Once Forge World updates it, it could be an option now that all of the models are usable.
|
40k:
8th Edtion: 9405 pts - Varantekh Dynasty |
|
 |
 |
|