Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

These FAQs are abysmal. Some of these ridiculous updates are questions I have never heard of/read. I guess the only real option is to wait for the next edition and the myriad issues that inevitably follow.

Womp womp

This^^^^^^

The Dark Eldar one is just pitiful.

Edit
Are these even new?

Says Dec15, so I suppose it should be but could probably be wrong though, not sure.

Skimmed through a few of the old ones when I first heard the rumor a few days ago, can't say I remember any specific details.

The DE one has only four points, and as a new DE player I'm not familiar enough with any of the rules or faqs yet so i can't say if one of the four tiny entries makes a difference.

So disappointed by Eldar iPad update still has incomplete rules for the Crimson Death formation.

You kinda wonder why they even bother with these anymore, as they're not willing to put in any effort anyway.

 Zywus wrote:
You kinda wonder why they even bother with these anymore, as they're not willing to put in any effort anyway.

You make it sound they were ever putting any effort into them.

I had hoped that the DE Archon would get FAQ'd so he could wear ghostplate, rather than having to fork out a gakload of points on a relic suit of armour. And pick a power weapon that is of some use like say, a lance. Ah well.

Not FAQing good enough lol.

That they havent addressed issues that make the game sometime unplayable (summoning a BT with blood points) is really an insult to the customers (And I'm not the kind of guy that say that lightly).

 casvalremdeikun wrote:

 Zywus wrote:
You kinda wonder why they even bother with these anymore, as they're not willing to put in any effort anyway.

You make it sound they were ever putting any effort into them.

Looking at the 1.1 they put out for 6th Edition Rulebook they did put some effort in, there were a good few pages in that one.

Hopefully this is at least a start of a round of proper updates. I admit it would be a bit of a weird way of doing it, not adding everything at once and then releasing them would make more sense, but at least we have something Regardless of how rubbish they actually are. There is still hope!

That's not an Errata, that's a joke. And a realy bad one. Nothing changed, besides the release date. Only usefull one comes for the DA, but even that could have been done much earlier.

 Gamgee wrote:
The DE one has only four points, and as a new DE player I'm not familiar enough with any of the rules or faqs yet so i can't say if one of the four tiny entries makes a difference.

I'm not certain but I'm pretty sure I read all 4 of those months ago, so no change on the DE front.

http://www.blacklibrary.com/Downloads/Product/PDF/Warhammer-40k/7th-faq/warhammer-40000-dec15.zip

Looks like they have uploaded a zip of all the updated PDF (sneakily hidden with -dec15). Doesn't look to be any major changes though Shield of Baal and Stronghold Assault also look to have some changes.

This is a joke. A sad joke.

 Orock wrote:
This is a joke. A sad joke.

It is pathetic, a year without any updates and the best they could do was to change the dates. We'd nearly have been better off with nothing at all.

 Ghaz wrote:

 casvalremdeikun wrote:

 Ironwill13791 wrote:
How do you find the FAQs on the Black Library site? I need the insurance for the inevitable "prove it" when I try to lead my ravenwing strike force with a librarian or something.

There is a thread in 40K General Discussion that has links to most of the errata.

Or you just look a few posts up in this thread...

Sure, I will just tell the people who don't use dakka to go on dakka dakka for the link..........I was mainly asking to let the other people in my store know where to find them (that wont make them question the validity because it wasn't found on the official site). Knowing where it is on one of the GW sites would be great (considering DA aren't in the "rules errata" on the main GW site)

 streetsamurai wrote:
That they havent addressed issues that make the game sometime unplayable (summoning a BT with blood points) is really an insult to the customers (And I'm not the kind of guy that say that lightly).

You are a customer of their game system, however they don't create game systems anymore.

Is there any errata for Tau or Mont'Ka? too much to hope for I know.

axisofentropy wrote:
Is there any errata for Tau or Mont'Ka? too much to hope for I know.

lol literally the only thing from any army that was updated I believe was 1 single thing in Dark Angels (Ravenwing)

axisofentropy wrote:
Is there any errata for Tau or Mont'Ka? too much to hope for I know.

If there were, it would be in the link Voodoo_Chile posted.

And they changed one of the Flesh Tearer's formations no one cares about from the Shield of Baal Exterminatus book to use Assault Terminators instead of regular ones... Whoooooo...

Am I the only one thinking this seems like a little bit too much effort to just be nothing? Why BOTHER for what, one clarification on the DA and one minor change to a formation that's like a year plus old? Why change all the dates? I feel like if they really have this little of a crap they'd just...not update everything?

the_scotsman wrote:
Am I the only one thinking this seems like a little bit too much effort to just be nothing? Why BOTHER for what, one clarification on the DA and one minor change to a formation that's like a year plus old? Why change all the dates? I feel like if they really have this little of a crap they'd just...not update everything?

And you just explained GW in a nutshell lol

As for changing the dates, those could just be placeholder PDF's... (yes, I know, hope springs eternal )

The DA fix was needed, so yay for that.

They fixed one issue in Exterminatus, but as a whole, the fomations in the book are too overpriced to field realistically due to the number of models needed. They need to make non-Apocalypse-sized formation for Blood Angels. And fix the fact they are the worst Space Marines by a large margin

 casvalremdeikun wrote:
The DA fix was needed, so yay for that.

They fixed one issue in Exterminatus, but as a whole, the fomations in the book are too overpriced to field realistically due to the number of models needed. They need to make non-Apocalypse-sized formation for Blood Angels. And fix the fact they are the worst Space Marines by a large margin

BA aren't that bad. I'd rate Grey Knights under BA tbh (I play both). At least BA have a few decent formations - GK have no useful ones at all - and still have access to some decent FW models like the Sicaran - again something where GK are left in the dust. Any even then I guess CSM are generally considered worse than those two.

GK's have ML3 Librarians, ML2 Captains that can actually use their decent BS, Draigo, and Dreadknights. They might have significantly less options and formations, but they're miles better than Blood Angels.

Apparently the Dark Angels are updated, but I haven't seen any differences (that I can tell) on any of the others.

Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
GK's have ML3 Librarians, ML2 Captains that can actually use their decent BS, Draigo, and Dreadknights. They might have significantly less options and formations, but they're miles better than Blood Angels.

Pretty much this. I almost spilled my drink when I saw GK worse than BA.

BA have ONE unit worth its points. PERIOD.