Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 22:40:56
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Tough Treekin
|
AoS has separate rules for linear obstacles, they're just not in the 'core' rules.
Would be extremely surprised if 40k didn't have them too.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 22:41:27
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 25 May 2017: Missions/Ork focus/FB #17(all info in OP)
|
 |
Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
BoomWolf wrote: casvalremdeikun wrote: BoomWolf wrote:They cost like a 7th crisis suit, come at high speed, fly and pack two decent guns....
So. Marine crisis suits.
That side picture of the numarine plasma reveals just how much tau tech is in it.
Long story short, numarine equipment was built using reversed tau tech.
The inquisition ain't gonna be happy once they find out.
Huh? The Plasma Incinerator looks almost exactly like a Skitarii Plasma Caliver. It even looks a lot like a scaled down version of the Plasma Cannon from the Venerable Dreadnought kit.
Can you not see the two power cells blobs right next to the handle who are IDENTICAL to the ones on tau plasma rifles, that no imperial weapon ever had?
I suggest you look at the Venerable Dreadnought Plasma Cannon.
|
5250 pts
3850 pts
Deathwatch: 1500 pts
Imperial Knights: 375 pts
30K 2500 pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 22:44:23
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 25 May 2017: Missions/Ork focus/FB #17(all info in OP)
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
docdoom77 wrote:dosiere wrote: docdoom77 wrote: JohnU wrote:A flat +1 for ALL types of terrain? Guess that really does simplify things.
I don't mind that, but I hate the "if all models in a unit are in a piece of terrain" part. So intervening cover means nothing? Yuck.
Yep, it's the same way in AoS and it makes no sense there either. Fortunately it's an example of a simple and usually unanimous house rule to set in place.
I just thought that 40k, being the kind of game it is would have better terrain rules. Cover has always been more important in 40k than in fantasy. This is easily the most disappointing thing I've seen from 8th (though I'm still feeling more positive than negative).
In a recent Frontline gaming podcast they said that there is much more in-depth terrain rules that what we have with 7th. Also in the community post about cities of death and ruins, they talked about infantry getting cover while in terrain while vehicles and monsters need to be obscured, and that infantry can move through ruins while vehicles and monsters cannot.
I would guess that there will be data slates for terrain and/or that there will be advanced rules for terrain that we are not seeing here.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 22:50:59
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Blood-Raging Khorne Berserker
|
I didn't see anything that prevents shooting a unit then charging a completely different unit? Did I just miss something in my excitement?
|
I need to return some video tapes.
Skulls for the Skull Throne |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 22:51:01
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
No seriously, did I miss bonus attack for charging or is it just not there anymore?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 22:52:01
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Mutilatin' Mad Dok
|
changemod wrote:No seriously, did I miss bonus attack for charging or is it just not there anymore?
I think it's been replaced by going first. Which is fine, but I sure hope Orks still have a Furious Charge equivalent, or they're gonna have some lackluster charges.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 22:52:04
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Intercessors at 24. Hellblasters are 23.
Kind of odd - I can't see a reason for it. Perhaps making the unit more palatable?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 22:52:09
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Jesus that Baal fluff is bad.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 22:52:23
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
changemod wrote:No seriously, did I miss bonus attack for charging or is it just not there anymore?
I think you just get to attack first instead.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 22:52:43
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Depraved Slaanesh Chaos Lord
Inside Yvraine
|
changemod wrote:No seriously, did I miss bonus attack for charging or is it just not there anymore?
The general assumption is that there is no universal charge bonus other then hitting first. The only units that will get an attack bonus for charging are those who have it as a special rule.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 22:53:20
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Unhealthy Competition With Other Legions
|
Captain in Gravis w/ Power Sword & Boltstorm Gauntlet = 135pts
Primaris Ancient = 63 points
LT w/Autobolt = 60
LW w/PS = 64
Inceptor = 159 *On the assumption they each have to buy 2 guns*
Hellblaster = 200
Intercessor = 120
Intercessor = 120
921 up to 947 depending on MC or regular power sword.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/05/27 04:23:47
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 22:53:39
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Brutal Black Orc
|
It was okay, to be honest.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 22:53:42
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus
|
The new marine Plasma rifles just look like marine sized Plasma Culverns that the Skitarii have
I dont see the tau tech
|
3000
4000 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 22:54:01
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Mutilatin' Mad Dok
|
Daedalus81 wrote:Intercessors at 24. Hellblasters are 23.
Kind of odd - I can't see a reason for it. Perhaps making the unit more palatable?
I'm sure it's because you have to buy the gun for 17 points.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 22:54:55
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
So based on the rules - everything can shoot and charge? Automatically Appended Next Post: docdoom77 wrote:Daedalus81 wrote:Intercessors at 24. Hellblasters are 23.
Kind of odd - I can't see a reason for it. Perhaps making the unit more palatable?
I'm sure it's because you have to buy the gun for 17 points.
Yea I figured as much. I don't think people can complain that Primaris are made to be more powerful than regular marines.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/05/26 22:55:27
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 22:55:55
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
Colorado Springs
|
So BA have been bailed out by Necrons, Khorne, and their spiritual liege?
I'm not sure which is more embarrassing.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 22:57:05
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
#forgethenarrative
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:00:22
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
jcd386 wrote:changemod wrote:No seriously, did I miss bonus attack for charging or is it just not there anymore?
I think you just get to attack first instead.
BlaxicanX wrote:changemod wrote:No seriously, did I miss bonus attack for charging or is it just not there anymore?
The general assumption is that there is no universal charge bonus other then hitting first. The only units that will get an attack bonus for charging are those who have it as a special rule.
Then I really hope they frequently raised the base attacks of assault units or bonus charge attacks are -really- common, because otherwise that along with the no bonus for two weapons thing is a major game-wide nerf to assault.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:01:01
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Re: awesome Nurgle art
Are those things in the lower left the full gribblies to the rumour engine pic of many chubby feet? Yum.
|
Looking for a Skaven Doomwheel banner to repair my Nurgle knights. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:02:43
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Courageous Space Marine Captain
|
docdoom77 wrote:Daedalus81 wrote:Intercessors at 24. Hellblasters are 23.
Kind of odd - I can't see a reason for it. Perhaps making the unit more palatable?
I'm sure it's because you have to buy the gun for 17 points.
Yes, but would it not make more sense to have the Hellblasters at 24 and the gun at 16?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:04:01
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
Vigo. Spain.
|
Binabik15 wrote:Re: awesome Nurgle art
Are those things in the lower left the full gribblies to the rumour engine pic of many chubby feet? Yum.
Nurgle Tryceratops/Elephants? Hmmm, jummy...
If it is only artist freedom I'll be both sad and happy. Sad because I love them, and happy because at last GW let artist drawn things that haven't models.
And in the Baal fluff... is bad yes, but really is just the cliché Imperial narrative of 95% of their storys
" WE ARE DOOMED. EPIC LAST STAND. OMG REINFORCEMENTS. WE ARE SAVED BUT BARELY ALIVE. CHAN CHAN CHAN A NEW VILLAIN EMERGES!"
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/05/26 23:04:12
Crimson Devil wrote:
Dakka does have White Knights and is also rather infamous for it's Black Knights. A new edition brings out the passionate and not all of them are good at expressing themselves in written form. There have been plenty of hysterical responses from both sides so far. So we descend into pointless bickering with neither side listening to each other. So posting here becomes more masturbation than conversation.
ERJAK wrote:Forcing a 40k player to keep playing 7th is basically a hate crime.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:05:16
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Battlewagon Driver with Charged Engine
|
changemod wrote:
Then I really hope they frequently raised the base attacks of assault units or bonus charge attacks are -really- common, because otherwise that along with the no bonus for two weapons thing is a major game-wide nerf to assault.
Orks got +1 attacks with choppas...presumably some other dual-wielding weapons will get the same rule.
No idea if boyz get furious charge...Reece/ GW did not decide to include any stats in the ork release.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:05:58
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Master Engineer with a Brace of Pistols
|
Is this the future of gets hot weapons? I like it, because even at their weakest level they still match what they were before.
And the Interceptors are unreal! Very cool though. And the Captain is cool too. Sorry, I'm gushing and my vocabulary is going out of the window.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:06:31
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Binabik15 wrote:Re: awesome Nurgle art
Are those things in the lower left the full gribblies to the rumour engine pic of many chubby feet? Yum.
I assume they are the new Beasts of Nurgle.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:09:29
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
You know as long as they've fixed tyranids as a playable faction, I give exactly zero feths about the fluff.
It's still bad, that they do it all the time is irrelevant.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:10:33
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
Denmark
|
So if you buy the weapons seperatly, thats 159,- for 3 Inceptors
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/05/26 23:12:57
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:10:58
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Hauptmann
|
JimOnMars wrote:changemod wrote:
Then I really hope they frequently raised the base attacks of assault units or bonus charge attacks are -really- common, because otherwise that along with the no bonus for two weapons thing is a major game-wide nerf to assault.
Orks got +1 attacks with choppas...presumably some other dual-wielding weapons will get the same rule.
No idea if boyz get furious charge...Reece/ GW did not decide to include any stats in the ork release.
It's also good to keep in mind that WS4 is likely to become WS 3+ now. Orks used to generally hit on 4's against basically everything. This can't be discounted when taking a look at CC specialists in the new edition, most of them got a decent boost in terms of hit rate.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:13:36
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 25 May 2017: Missions/Ork focus/FB #17(all info in OP)
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Galas wrote:Poor Tyranids... feeded to Khorne:
What a coincidence how great losses all chapters receive now that you can have Super better Primaris Marines, eh?
This is quite possibly the worst fluff gw has ever written.
|
Keeper of the DomBox
Warhammer Armies - Click to see galleries of fully painted armies
32,000, 19,000, Renegades - 10,000 , 7,500, |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:16:58
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 25 May 2017: Missions/Ork focus/FB #17(all info in OP)
|
 |
Veteran Inquisitorial Tyranid Xenokiller
|
Kirasu wrote: Galas wrote:Poor Tyranids... feeded to Khorne:
What a coincidence how great losses all chapters receive now that you can have Super better Primaris Marines, eh?
This is quite possibly the worst fluff gw has ever written.
It's not that bad. When I started reading it I thought they might wipe out every blood angel except commander date and then have gulliman offer him "reinforcements"
|
Inquisitor Jex wrote:Yeah, telling people how this and that is 'garbage' and they should just throw their minis into the trash as they're not as efficient as XYZ.
Peregrine wrote:So the solution is to lie and pretend that certain options are effective so people will feel better? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:18:14
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
I like that the points aren't all round 5s, 10s etc. I trust non-round numbers more than conveniently rounded ones!
|
Stormonu wrote:For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules" |
|
 |
 |
|