| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 20:49:57
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Chopxsticks wrote:As a new player to 40k, getting the starter box and going with Death Guard, is this like AoS where I can field a mix of "Chaos" aligned models? Like can I use my Tzaanzagor and New Death guard, and throw in some Khorne stuff?
Yes. As long as they share one Faction Keyword (in this case, Chaos).
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 20:53:02
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Stubborn White Lion
|
v0iddrgn wrote:So, am looking at this right? A Deff Dread costs 74 plus the 2 dread klaws and the 2 big Shoota for a total base price of 131? Or is it just 74?
That would be 131 you have to buy all equipment a model is being armed with even if it's the basic loadout.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 20:59:55
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Sneaky Kommando
|
Mantle wrote:v0iddrgn wrote:So, am looking at this right? A Deff Dread costs 74 plus the 2 dread klaws and the 2 big Shoota for a total base price of 131? Or is it just 74?
That would be 131 you have to buy all equipment a model is being armed with even if it's the basic loadout.
Now compare it to a space Marine dread.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 21:06:14
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Irked Necron Immortal
Colorado
|
Rippy wrote:v0iddrgn wrote:So, am looking at this right? A Deff Dread costs 74 plus the 2 dread klaws and the 2 big Shoota for a total base price of 131? Or is it just 74?
131, see how the entry says "Wargear not included" so you need to add the Wargear points to the base model.
Yeah, I saw that. Guess I just didn't like the idea of paying 80ish points each for my Deffkoptas. BTW I noticed Flash Gitz are straight-up BS 4+ now
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/06/01 21:07:07
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 21:07:18
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Battlezones (special rules)- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Sister Oh-So Repentia
|
Twoshoes23 wrote:
Ya, I'm waiting for the Repressor battlesheet, assuming it will get one.
Same. I'm very nervous that it will lose its fire points though - seeing as Rhinos, Immolators, Chimeras and Tauroxes have all lost theirs. Only vehicles with the 'open-topped' rule seem to have this ability now. If we can't fire out of the Repressor, will we really want a T8 W12 Rhino (assuming it shares the Exorcists' stat line)?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 21:30:06
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Swamp Troll
San Diego
|
Are any of the FW indexes leaked yet? (would that be indices?)
I looked through the OP and only saw the main ones so I thought I would ask. Gotta find out about mah orks
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 21:32:30
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
MLaw wrote:Are any of the FW indexes leaked yet? (would that be indices?)
I looked through the OP and only saw the main ones so I thought I would ask. Gotta find out about mah orks
Not that I've seen (and I guarantee not in this thread).
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 21:40:12
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Fully-charged Electropriest
UK
|
I doubt the FW books will leak till they hit release, unlike the GW indexes they don't have to ship them out to any stores beforehand.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 21:42:32
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
Looking at the Overwatch rules in the rulebook, they occur before the actual Charge movement and follow all the rules for shooting except you have to have a 6 to hit.
Does that mean that if a unit starts a Charge beyond 8", you don't get to overwatch with a Flamer?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 21:44:50
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
flakpanzer wrote:Looking at the Overwatch rules in the rulebook, they occur before the actual Charge movement and follow all the rules for shooting except you have to have a 6 to hit.
Does that mean that if a unit starts a Charge beyond 8", you don't get to overwatch with a Flamer?
That interpretation seems to be what everyone is going with. The text that allowed flamers to always hit regardless of range in 7th doesn't exist in 8th.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 21:58:57
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Well.....
Having pondered the rules for a long while, there are many things I like, and a handful I don't.
Not to beat the dead horse here, but I do wish there was some bonus for attacking the back half of a vhicle or Monstrous creature. Something like a +1 to hit would work fine.
I'm also bummed out that Custodes totally lost their ability to Deep Strike. They were the only army that had a deepstriking dreadnought that didn't need a drop pod. Now they are a total close combat army without the ability to shoot to any great degree.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 22:02:09
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
cuda1179 wrote:Well.....
Having pondered the rules for a long while, there are many things I like, and a handful I don't.
Not to beat the dead horse here, but I do wish there was some bonus for attacking the back half of a vhicle or Monstrous creature. Something like a +1 to hit would work fine.
I'm also bummed out that Custodes totally lost their ability to Deep Strike. They were the only army that had a deepstriking dreadnought that didn't need a drop pod. Now they are a total close combat army without the ability to shoot to any great degree.
The entire Chaos Daemon faction lost Deep Strike as well. :(
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 22:02:37
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Ancient Venerable Black Templar Dreadnought
Where ever the Emperor needs his eyes
|
cuda1179 wrote:Well.....
Having pondered the rules for a long while, there are many things I like, and a handful I don't.
Not to beat the dead horse here, but I do wish there was some bonus for attacking the back half of a vhicle or Monstrous creature. Something like a +1 to hit would work fine.
I'm also bummed out that Custodes totally lost their ability to Deep Strike. They were the only army that had a deepstriking dreadnought that didn't need a drop pod. Now they are a total close combat army without the ability to shoot to any great degree.
Use Land Raiders?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 22:15:26
Subject: Re:40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Looks like Vanguard Vets can take two chainswords, and, having two attacks, are able to split their attacks between each chainsword. As we all know, whenever you use a chainsword to attack, you can make an additional chainsword attack, thus doubling their attacks, yes?
Seems neat for a free upgrade.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 22:22:12
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Something I noticed the other day was a misprint on the Onager Dunecrawler. The characteristics on the damage chart go from 7-11+ and then 3-5. What happens at 6?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 22:39:01
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Fireknife Shas'el
Lisbon, Portugal
|
Messiah wrote:Something I noticed the other day was a misprint on the Onager Dunecrawler. The characteristics on the damage chart go from 7-11+ and then 3-5. What happens at 6? 
Slaanesh takes over and it becomes a defiler!
|
AI & BFG: / BMG: Mr. Freeze, Deathstroke / Battletech: SR, OWA / Fallout Factions: BoS / HGB: Caprice / Malifaux: Arcanists, Guild, Outcasts / MCP: Mutants / SAGA: Ordensstaat / SW Legion: CIS / WWX: Union
Unit1126PLL wrote:"FW is unbalanced and going to ruin tournaments."
"Name one where it did that."
"IT JUST DOES OKAY!"
Shadenuat wrote:Voted Astra Militarum for a chance for them to get nerfed instead of my own army. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 22:39:43
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Unhealthy Competition With Other Legions
|
Vector Strike wrote:Messiah wrote:Something I noticed the other day was a misprint on the Onager Dunecrawler. The characteristics on the damage chart go from 7-11+ and then 3-5. What happens at 6? 
Slaanesh takes over and it becomes a defiler!
Whats the big deal with Defilers?
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2017/06/01 22:39:56
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 23:00:08
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General
We'll find out soon enough eh.
|
That art stream was interesting. On the one hand the news that they've recognised the "obviously digital" plastic look doesn't really fit with 40K, and that they're starting to do more work that focuses on "background" stuff, is all very welcome.
On the other, it's interesting to find out that they saw the old way of doing things as a weakness that undermined the IP when I've always found the opposite. Having multiple different artists all coming at the same themes with their own styles meant that while most people would have a preference for one style over another, almost everyone could find a favourite style very easily, and of course that could change over time - some projects I've worked on were fuelled by a particular artist who at other times I hadn't rated very highly but who had created a piece with just the right tone to match what was going on in my head.
They seem to be trying to "distill" all of the common elements out of the work from the various big names who've worked on the IP previously, but while that might result in a "stronger brand" I don't know that it will produce better art - I rate consistency in tone and theme far higher than consistency in style.
All that said, it seems like the rulebook from the boxed set will have some value in terms of new artwork even if I don't end up enjoying 8th as a system, so that's good to know.
|
I need to acquire plastic Skavenslaves, can you help?
I have a blog now, evidently. Featuring the Alternative Mordheim Model Megalist.
"Your society's broken, so who should we blame? Should we blame the rich, powerful people who caused it? No, lets blame the people with no power and no money and those immigrants who don't even have the vote. Yea, it must be their fething fault." - Iain M Banks
-----
"The language of modern British politics is meant to sound benign. But words do not mean what they seem to mean. 'Reform' actually means 'cut' or 'end'. 'Flexibility' really means 'exploit'. 'Prudence' really means 'don't invest'. And 'efficient'? That means whatever you want it to mean, usually 'cut'. All really mean 'keep wages low for the masses, taxes low for the rich, profits high for the corporations, and accept the decline in public services and amenities this will cause'." - Robin McAlpine from Common Weal |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 23:23:50
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Stubborn White Lion
|
Don't know if this has been sorted out yet but the wording for dedicated transports just confuses my brain for some reason haha.
It reads something like may take a dedicated transport for each other choice, does this mean you can take a dedicated transport for every other choice as in half of the force org slots you take or does it mean you can take a dedicated transport for every other choice meaning take one for every choice that is not a dedicated transport.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 23:25:49
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Fireknife Shas'el
Lisbon, Portugal
|
Looks like any kind of Outflank is gone. Is it how you see it too, guys? Or did someone retain this ability?
edit: looks like ork warbuggies and AM rough rides have it
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2017/06/01 23:31:09
AI & BFG: / BMG: Mr. Freeze, Deathstroke / Battletech: SR, OWA / Fallout Factions: BoS / HGB: Caprice / Malifaux: Arcanists, Guild, Outcasts / MCP: Mutants / SAGA: Ordensstaat / SW Legion: CIS / WWX: Union
Unit1126PLL wrote:"FW is unbalanced and going to ruin tournaments."
"Name one where it did that."
"IT JUST DOES OKAY!"
Shadenuat wrote:Voted Astra Militarum for a chance for them to get nerfed instead of my own army. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 23:27:58
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Stubborn White Lion
|
Vector Strike wrote:Looks like any kind of Outflank is gone. Is it how you see it too, guys? Or did someone retain this ability?
Wolf scouts sort of retained it, they can arrive from reserve 6" from a board edge and 9" from the enemy.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 23:28:34
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Grim Rune Priest in the Eye of the Storm
|
Vector Strike wrote:Looks like any kind of Outflank is gone. Is it how you see it too, guys? Or did someone retain this ability?
Wolf Scouts and Harald Deathwolf have 'Behind Enemy Lines'
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 23:29:11
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Vector Strike wrote:Looks like any kind of Outflank is gone. Is it how you see it too, guys? Or did someone retain this ability?
GSC has randomized outflank amoung other things.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 23:29:30
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Mantle wrote:Don't know if this has been sorted out yet but the wording for dedicated transports just confuses my brain for some reason haha.
It reads something like may take a dedicated transport for each other choice, does this mean you can take a dedicated transport for every other choice as in half of the force org slots you take or does it mean you can take a dedicated transport for every other choice meaning take one for every choice that is not a dedicated transport.
Second option.
|
"The Omnissiah is my Moderati" |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 23:29:36
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Boosting Space Marine Biker
|
Speculation: outflank and deep striking will be more prevalent through stratagems.
And yeah, I read it as you can take a dedicated transport for each other choice, but actually using them as a transport is restricted through keywords.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 23:33:35
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Water-Caste Negotiator
|
Mantle wrote:Don't know if this has been sorted out yet but the wording for dedicated transports just confuses my brain for some reason haha.
It reads something like may take a dedicated transport for each other choice, does this mean you can take a dedicated transport for every other choice as in half of the force org slots you take or does it mean you can take a dedicated transport for every other choice meaning take one for every choice that is not a dedicated transport.
My reading of it is that for every unit you take in your army that fills a force org slot that is not also a Transport, you can take 1 dedicated transport. IE, if you have 1 Captain, 3 tactical squads, 1 assault squad, and 1 devastator squad, you can take up to 6 transports with your army, provided you have the points to do so.
|
Mobile Assault Cadre: 9,500 points (3,200 points fully painted)
Genestealer Cult 1228 points
849 points/ 15 SWC |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 23:36:36
Subject: Re:40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
you can take a dedicated transport for every other choice meaning take one for every choice that is not a dedicated transport.
Finally, your Leman Russ battle tanks can purchase the dedicated transport they always wanted.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 23:50:09
Subject: Re:40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
Vigo. Spain.
|
Justyn wrote:you can take a dedicated transport for every other choice meaning take one for every choice that is not a dedicated transport.
Finally, your Leman Russ battle tanks can purchase the dedicated transport they always wanted.
Seems good to me:
|
Crimson Devil wrote:
Dakka does have White Knights and is also rather infamous for it's Black Knights. A new edition brings out the passionate and not all of them are good at expressing themselves in written form. There have been plenty of hysterical responses from both sides so far. So we descend into pointless bickering with neither side listening to each other. So posting here becomes more masturbation than conversation.
ERJAK wrote:Forcing a 40k player to keep playing 7th is basically a hate crime.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/01 23:57:31
Subject: Re:40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Looking at the Overwatch rules in the rulebook, they occur before the actual Charge movement and follow all the rules for shooting except you have to have a 6 to hit.
Does that mean that if a unit starts a Charge beyond 8", you don't get to overwatch with a Flamer?
It also currently means if you charge with a Character while you have a unit closer, they don't get to overwatch unless they have sniper rifles. Good Day Sir, I said GOOD DAY SIR!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/02 00:01:50
Subject: Re:40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd May 2017: Full rulebook/index leaks in op- Also On-Topic Warning in OP
|
 |
Angelic Adepta Sororitas
|
Justyn wrote:Looking at the Overwatch rules in the rulebook, they occur before the actual Charge movement and follow all the rules for shooting except you have to have a 6 to hit.
Does that mean that if a unit starts a Charge beyond 8", you don't get to overwatch with a Flamer?
It also currently means if you charge with a Character while you have a unit closer, they don't get to overwatch unless they have sniper rifles. Good Day Sir, I said GOOD DAY SIR!
That just seems goofy to me.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|