| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 02:00:36
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 3rd June 17: Primaris Tank Revealed / Pre-Order (all info in OP)
|
 |
Ancient Chaos Terminator
|
Loving looking at the Dark imperium models in 360 degrees <3
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/06/03 02:18:06
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 02:05:48
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 3rd June 17: Primaris Tank Revealed/campaign/"expansion" (all info in OP)
|
 |
Contagious Dreadnought of Nurgle
|
Rippy wrote:Loving looking at the Dark imperium models in 360 degrees <3
They do look pretty good...
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 02:05:49
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 3rd June 17: Primaris Tank Revealed/campaign/"expansion" (all info in OP)
|
 |
Liche Priest Hierophant
|
So... how does the whole free mission cards thing work? Do they appear in your cart before you order if they're available? Or are they meant to only appear after you place your order?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/06/03 02:06:02
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 02:17:08
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd June 17: Primaris Tank Revealed/campaign/"expansion" (all info in OP)
|
 |
Ancient Chaos Terminator
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 02:24:23
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 3rd June 17: Primaris Tank Revealed / Pre-Order (all info in OP)
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Rippy wrote:Loving looking at the Dark imperium models in 360 degrees <3
Where?! :O
Were there any hints about the content of that first Chapter Approved book?
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 02:29:03
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 3rd June 17: Primaris Tank Revealed / Pre-Order (all info in OP)
|
 |
Ancient Chaos Terminator
|
Rumored repulsive Repulsor stats on Faeit212 (apparently from "good sources"  :
Power level 14
S7 T8 W13 Sv3+
Turret - Heavy Lascannon, Heavy Stubber
*Resolve shots with Heavy Stubber first, if the Heavy Lascannon targets a unit hit by the Stubber, it may reroll misses
Hull-mounted Twin Lascannon, swivels up/down and left/right
Rotor cannon is a pintle mounted upgrade
Missiles: Roll a D6 at the start of each fight phase for each enemy unit within 1", on a 4+ it takes D3 mortal wounds (slightly better Frag Assault Launchers)
Transport Capacity 7, can only transport Primaris Marines
Decays its Movement/ BS/Attacks as it loses wounds
Movement 10" BS 3+ Attacks 3 base
Mr BugBear wrote: Rippy wrote:Loving looking at the Dark imperium models in 360 degrees <3
Where?! :O
Were there any hints about the content of that first Chapter Approved book?
https://www.games-workshop.com/en-AU/Warhammer-40000-dark-imperium-eng-2017
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 02:32:05
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 3rd June 17: Primaris Tank Revealed / Pre-Order (all info in OP)
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Rippy wrote:Rumored repulsive Repulsor stats on Faeit212 (apparently from "good sources"  :
Power level 14
S7 T8 W13 Sv3+
Turret - Heavy Lascannon, Heavy Stubber
*Resolve shots with Heavy Stubber first, if the Heavy Lascannon targets a unit hit by the Stubber, it may reroll misses
Hull-mounted Twin Lascannon, swivels up/down and left/right
Rotor cannon is a pintle mounted upgrade
Missiles: Roll a D6 at the start of each fight phase for each enemy unit within 1", on a 4+ it takes D3 mortal wounds (slightly better Frag Assault Launchers)
Transport Capacity 7, can only transport Primaris Marines
Decays its Movement/ BS/Attacks as it loses wounds
Movement 10" BS 3+ Attacks 3 base
Mr BugBear wrote: Rippy wrote:Loving looking at the Dark imperium models in 360 degrees <3
Where?! :O
Were there any hints about the content of that first Chapter Approved book?
https://www.games-workshop.com/en-AU/Warhammer-40000-dark-imperium-eng-2017
Cool concept but...using a stubber to help you range in with your LASER cannon? Hm...
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 02:35:46
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 3rd June 17: Primaris Tank stats? / Starter Pre-orders (all info in OP)
|
 |
Ancient Chaos Terminator
|
Guessing that is for focused targetting, Mr BugBear (also are you a bug or a bear?)
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 02:42:10
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 3rd June 17: Primaris Tank stats? / Starter Pre-orders (all info in OP)
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Rippy wrote:Guessing that is for focused targetting, Mr BugBear (also are you a bug or a bear?)
I see. I play a few simulator games and using your MG to help you range in before firing your cannon is a common practice so that's what came to mind. I identify as a bear atm.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 02:44:02
Subject: Re:40k New Edition Summary - 3rd June 17: Primaris Tank stats? / Starter Pre-orders (all info in OP)
|
 |
Stealthy Kroot Stalker
|
Any rumored stats for the "Heavy" Lascannon?
Also, why are Primaris Marines getting my Hammerhead's Flechette Dischargers before me, huh!?!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 02:51:09
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 3rd June 17: Primaris Tank stats? / Starter Pre-orders (all info in OP)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Have your local retailer buy it for you with his VAT number and make you a 25% discount. Sell the big rulebook for like 200, artbook for 100, art posters for 50, poster for 50 and suddenly you are looking at a price of 150ish
Anyways, if the thing's going to cost 250, that's at least 300 euros...Which is pretty much a Cerastus Knight + GW Knight
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2017/06/03 02:54:13
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 03:17:38
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 3rd June 17: Primaris Tank stats? / Starter Pre-orders (all info in OP)
|
 |
Ancient Chaos Terminator
|
I have added a search function to the OP.
As it states there:
"Newest Information in red below with an asterisk in front, use ctrl+F to search * for the most recently added information"
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 03:20:20
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 3rd June 17: Primaris Tank stats? / Starter Pre-orders (all info in OP)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Chapter approved is coming back? That makes me happy. I remember reading through those when I was a kid, before I could afford to play but could manage getting those from a used bookstore.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 03:23:21
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 3rd June 17: Primaris Tank stats? / Starter Pre-orders (all info in OP)
|
 |
Ancient Chaos Terminator
|
SilverAlien wrote:Chapter approved is coming back? That makes me happy. I remember reading through those when I was a kid, before I could afford to play but could manage getting those from a used bookstore.
Yes, but they are very different now. They are yearly (at least) updates containing new content to keep 40k fresh, apparently.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 03:28:33
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 3rd June 17: Primaris Tank Revealed / Pre-Order (all info in OP)
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Rippy wrote:Rumored repulsive Repulsor stats on Faeit212 (apparently from "good sources"  :
[...]
Transport Capacity 7, can only transport Primaris Marines
[...]
Must have a "Must be this tall to ride" marker next to the door.
I hope that turns out not to be true because it stinks of cash-grab. What other reason could there be that normal marines couldn't fit?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 03:31:54
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 3rd June 17: Primaris Tank stats? / Starter Pre-orders (all info in OP)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
It is worth pointing out that for those of us in Japan, Australia or New Zealand, the digital versions of all the books are substantially cheaper than the physical versions.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 03:31:55
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 3rd June 17: Primaris Tank stats? / Starter Pre-orders (all info in OP)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Rippy wrote:SilverAlien wrote:Chapter approved is coming back? That makes me happy. I remember reading through those when I was a kid, before I could afford to play but could manage getting those from a used bookstore.
Yes, but they are very different now. They are yearly (at least) updates containing new content to keep 40k fresh, apparently.
Wasn't that almost exactly what the annual chapter approved book was before? It might feel a bit different, not being a collection of articles mixed together, but will probably be similar.
Also a good way for them to regularly put out stats for new/upcoming models.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 03:38:42
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 3rd June 17: Primaris Tank stats? / Starter Pre-orders (all info in OP)
|
 |
Ancient Chaos Terminator
|
SilverAlien wrote: Rippy wrote:SilverAlien wrote:Chapter approved is coming back? That makes me happy. I remember reading through those when I was a kid, before I could afford to play but could manage getting those from a used bookstore.
Yes, but they are very different now. They are yearly (at least) updates containing new content to keep 40k fresh, apparently.
Wasn't that almost exactly what the annual chapter approved book was before? It might feel a bit different, not being a collection of articles mixed together, but will probably be similar.
Also a good way for them to regularly put out stats for new/upcoming models.
I guess it is similar in that way, yeah
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 03:44:52
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 3rd June 17: Primaris Tank stats? / Starter Pre-orders (all info in OP)
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
Rippy wrote:SilverAlien wrote:Chapter approved is coming back? That makes me happy. I remember reading through those when I was a kid, before I could afford to play but could manage getting those from a used bookstore.
Yes, but they are very different now. They are yearly (at least) updates containing new content to keep 40k fresh, apparently.
a.k.a the 40k version of Age of Sigmar's General's Handbook.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 03:46:19
Subject: Re:40k New Edition Summary - 3rd June 17: Primaris Tank stats? / Starter Pre-orders (all info in OP)
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Unusual Suspect wrote:Any rumored stats for the "Heavy" Lascannon?
Also, why are Primaris Marines getting my Hammerhead's Flechette Dischargers before me, huh!?!
All bets on S10 AP4
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 04:10:40
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 3rd June 17: Primaris Tank Revealed / Pre-Order (all info in OP)
|
 |
The New Miss Macross!
|
JBSchroeds wrote: Rippy wrote:Rumored repulsive Repulsor stats on Faeit212 (apparently from "good sources"  : [...] Transport Capacity 7, can only transport Primaris Marines [...] Must have a "Must be this tall to ride" marker next to the door. I hope that turns out not to be true because it stinks of cash-grab. What other reason could there be that normal marines couldn't fit? They said that Primaris marines have two additional implants on top of those Astartes Secondus have. Perhaps they're Kardashian Pattern Cheek Implants? If that were the case, normal marines may simply not fit in the seats of the Grav Raider properly.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/06/03 04:13:04
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 04:34:49
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 3rd June 17: Primaris Tank stats? / Starter Pre-orders (all info in OP)
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
So, I noticed something funny about Dark Angel Terminators. Unlike everyone else's terminators, when they get a heavy weapon they do NOT need to turn in their storm bolters.
So, a Dark Angel Terminator can have:
a power fist, two storm bolters, cyclone missile launcher
Power fist, storm bolter, plasma cannon,
Power fist, storm bolter, assault cannon.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 05:14:43
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 3rd June 17: Primaris Tank stats? / Starter Pre-orders (all info in OP)
|
 |
The New Miss Macross!
|
cuda1179 wrote:So, I noticed something funny about Dark Angel Terminators. Unlike everyone else's terminators, when they get a heavy weapon they do NOT need to turn in their storm bolters. So, a Dark Angel Terminator can have: a power fist, two storm bolters, cyclone missile launcher Power fist, storm bolter, plasma cannon, Power fist, storm bolter, assault cannon. IIRC the Dark Angel Captain had that same quirk in the 4th/5th edition codex. A friend of mine would load him up with every option possible like a swisstartes army knife.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/06/03 05:15:22
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 05:22:22
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd June 17: Primaris Tank Revealed/campaign/"expansion" (all info in OP)
|
 |
Locked in the Tower of Amareo
|
oni wrote:New tank? Whatever... I just realized why drop pods are 105 points now.
You now have to stay 1" away from my drop pod petals as I place a wall of them across the battlefield.
They're part of the model... There's no more rules for vehicle hulls etc.
Christ. This was disastrous ruling in 7th ed FAQ which even GW retracked. They couldn\t have brought it back? Surely something has been missed!
|
2024 painted/bought: 109/109 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 05:46:26
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 3rd June 17: Primaris Tank stats? / Starter Pre-orders (all info in OP)
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
Drop pod petals not counting has always been a house rule, other than the final FAQ, and I don't expect that to change.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 06:01:15
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 3rd June 17: Primaris Tank stats? / Starter Pre-orders (all info in OP)
|
 |
Huge Hierodule
|
MasterSlowPoke wrote:Drop pod petals not counting has always been a house rule, other than the final FAQ, and I don't expect that to change.
I could be misremembering because it's when i started playing, but I think there was some mention made of ignoring the doors in the 5th edition marine codex.
|
Been out of the game for awhile, trying to find time to get back into it. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 06:12:07
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd June 17: Primaris Tank Revealed/campaign/"expansion" (all info in OP)
|
 |
Locked in the Tower of Amareo
|
H.B.M.C. wrote: Rippy wrote: Luciferian wrote: Nicorex wrote:Its 826 NZ dollars.. that works out to 590.16 in US currency.
 Wow, that might be the single most outrageous price point I've ever seen for a GW product.
It's only outrageous if people aren't willing to pay it....
Nah bruv, it's pretty insane.
AUD$700, BTW.
Crikey!
Well if they sell out they priced it pretty right. Or even too cheap though we don't know. If it would sell 1 short then price would be pretty ideal(of course that 1 more would be even better but then would remain question would they have sold more if they had printed more) Automatically Appended Next Post: JBSchroeds wrote:
I hope that turns out not to be true because it stinks of cash-grab. What other reason could there be that normal marines couldn't fit?
Why storm troopers don't fit in rhino? Automatically Appended Next Post: MasterSlowPoke wrote:Drop pod petals not counting has always been a house rule, other than the final FAQ, and I don't expect that to change.
And you know why it was always used house rule? Because otherwise it's big pile of can of worms even GW realized that was seriously bad idea.
GW takes one step forward, 1 step backward and 1 step sideway as usual. They got it sensible and now took step backward again it seems. Somebody please find something showing it's not so. Automatically Appended Next Post: Wunzlez wrote:Someone else has probably noticed this already amongst other errors, but under the entry for Obliterators on the leaked chaos book the rules for strength, armour piercing and damage are listed as 6+D3, D3 & D3 respectively.
However the explanation for this system and the example given are wrong. It states in demonstration that "For example if the rolls were a 1, followed by a 3, followed by a 2, then that unit's attacks would have a Strength of 7, an AP of - 3, and a damage of 2 for that shooting phase or overwatch attack"
Spot the obvious mistake?
And with my pointless and extremely specific pedantry quota filled, I'm of to recharge.
AP being positive or negatively?
|
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2017/06/03 06:21:04
2024 painted/bought: 109/109 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 06:36:13
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 3rd June 17: Primaris Tank Revealed / Pre-Order (all info in OP)
|
 |
Executing Exarch
|
Rippy wrote:Rumored repulsive Repulsor stats on Faeit212 (apparently from "good sources"  :
Power level 14
S7 T8 W13 Sv3+
Turret - Heavy Lascannon, Heavy Stubber
*Resolve shots with Heavy Stubber first, if the Heavy Lascannon targets a unit hit by the Stubber, it may reroll misses
Hull-mounted Twin Lascannon, swivels up/down and left/right
Rotor cannon is a pintle mounted upgrade
Missiles: Roll a D6 at the start of each fight phase for each enemy unit within 1", on a 4+ it takes D3 mortal wounds (slightly better Frag Assault Launchers)
Transport Capacity 7, can only transport Primaris Marines
Decays its Movement/ BS/Attacks as it loses wounds
Movement 10" BS 3+ Attacks 3 base
Mr BugBear wrote: Rippy wrote:Loving looking at the Dark imperium models in 360 degrees <3
Where?! :O
Were there any hints about the content of that first Chapter Approved book?
https://www.games-workshop.com/en-AU/Warhammer-40000-dark-imperium-eng-2017
Wait a minute... Space Marines are getting the old Scatter Laser laser lock?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 06:39:21
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 3rd June 17: Primaris Tank stats? / Starter Pre-orders (all info in OP)
|
 |
Auspicious Aspiring Champion of Chaos
|
warboss wrote: cuda1179 wrote:So, I noticed something funny about Dark Angel Terminators. Unlike everyone else's terminators, when they get a heavy weapon they do NOT need to turn in their storm bolters.
So, a Dark Angel Terminator can have:
a power fist, two storm bolters, cyclone missile launcher
Power fist, storm bolter, plasma cannon,
Power fist, storm bolter, assault cannon.
IIRC the Dark Angel Captain had that same quirk in the 4th/5th edition codex. A friend of mine would load him up with every option possible like a swisstartes army knife.
Knights of Geneva, DA successor chapter, I'm assuming?
|
I collect:
Grand alliance death (whole alliance)
Stormcast eternals
Slaves to Darkness - currently Nurgle but may expand to undivided.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/03 06:44:18
Subject: 40k 8th Edition Summary - 2nd June 17: Primaris Tank Revealed/campaign/"expansion" (all info in OP)
|
 |
Liche Priest Hierophant
|
Wunzlez wrote:Someone else has probably noticed this already amongst other errors, but under the entry for Obliterators on the leaked chaos book the rules for strength, armour piercing and damage are listed as 6+D3, D3 & D3 respectively.
However the explanation for this system and the example given are wrong. It states in demonstration that "For example if the rolls were a 1, followed by a 3, followed by a 2, then that unit's attacks would have a Strength of 7, an AP of - 3, and a damage of 2 for that shooting phase or overwatch attack"
Spot the obvious mistake?
And with my pointless and extremely specific pedantry quota filled, I'm of to recharge.
Except for the fact that the entry lists the AP as -D3, not D3, so the obvious mistake is you read it wrong.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|