Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
|
2018/04/28 09:18:58
Subject: 8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Warning From Magnus? Not Listening!
|
Thefriendlygrot wrote:I assume Grey Knights lose the Heed the Prognosticar’s buff if they use Gate of Infinity because of the BRB FAQ. Is that how everyone here sees it?
Hadnt thought of that but yeah. I thought that was a weird ruling tbh, not sure what was being abused for them to rule that way
|
My P&M blog
DC:90S++G+++M+B+IPw40k04#+D+A+++/cWD241R++T(T)DM+ |
|
|
|
2018/04/28 11:31:46
Subject: 8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Painlord Titan Princeps of Slaanesh
|
Where is the rule or can someone summarize it?
|
|
|
|
2018/04/28 13:44:14
Subject: 8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Hooded Inquisitorial Interrogator
|
Q: If you use a Stratagem to remove a model from the battlefield and set it up again, does the model retain any persistent effects (for example, a bonus to one of its characteristics as a result of an ability)? A: No
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2018/04/28 13:44:45
There is no such thing as a plea of innocence in my court. A plea of innocence is guilty of wasting my time. Guilty. - Lord Inquisitor Fyodor Karamazov
In an Imperium of a million worlds, what is the death of one world in the cause of purity?~Inquisition credo
He who allows the alien to live, shares its crime of existence. ~Inquisitor Apollyon
|
|
|
|
2018/04/28 13:53:30
Subject: 8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Painlord Titan Princeps of Slaanesh
|
I hadn't noticed that question. Thank you.
I will admit that Heed hasn't been one of my most used stratagems simply due to not having enough CPs. I have mostly used it when I'm already on the board (GMDK) and just wanted some extra armor to survive to the next round.
|
|
|
|
2018/04/28 17:52:13
Subject: 8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Guarded Grey Knight Terminator
|
I like you give it to a grand Master dk to get him that 3++ then sanctuary another gmdk so I have two of them at 3++... But now gate of infinity kills it. : ( GW keeps nerfing us little by little. Automatically Appended Next Post: Leo_the_Rat wrote:
Also has anyone considered just making 6 man strike squads and interceptors? It really raises the PL of the army and would allow us to drop more models from deepstrike without too much more in point costs. Strike squads go from 7 PL to 14PL with that extra model.
And two squads fit perfectly in a storm raven...
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/04/28 19:41:29
"Glory in our suffering, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope. And hope does not disappoint"
-Paul of Tarsus
If my post seems goofy, assume I am posting from my phone and the autocorrect elf in my phone is drunk again |
|
|
|
2018/04/29 00:44:57
Subject: 8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Warning From Magnus? Not Listening!
|
Smotejob wrote:I like you give it to a grand Master dk to get him that 3++ then sanctuary another gmdk so I have two of them at 3++... But now gate of infinity kills it. : ( GW keeps nerfing us little by little.
Just cast sanctuary on the one that's gating and give heed to the one that isn't
Edit: just remembered this doesn't work if the one that isn't gating is deepstriking
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2018/04/29 00:46:57
My P&M blog
DC:90S++G+++M+B+IPw40k04#+D+A+++/cWD241R++T(T)DM+ |
|
|
|
2018/05/01 02:03:42
Subject: Re:8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
What are the top tier units to use for Grey Knights? I think they were Grand Masters in Nemesis Dreadknight armor and Strike Squads. What are they now with the update?
|
|
|
|
2018/05/01 02:14:51
Subject: Re:8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
BillyN831 wrote:What are the top tier units to use for Grey Knights? I think they were Grand Masters in Nemesis Dreadknight armor and Strike Squads. What are they now with the update?
Grandmaster Dreadknights, Strike Squads, and Interceptor Squads. Then you have the middling Paladins and Purgator Squads and Draigo. Ignore anything else.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
|
|
2018/05/01 05:40:15
Subject: 8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Fresh-Faced New User
|
few list from tourneys that I would like to share
https://diceshot.com/category/grey-knight/
|
|
|
|
2018/05/01 07:25:58
Subject: 8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Sneaky Sniper Drone
|
Great, but it kinda sucks that we have to include a batallion of IG to work..
|
|
|
|
2018/05/01 09:44:50
Subject: 8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Dakka Veteran
|
I'd imagine those tournaments weren't running the beta deep strike rule ?
|
|
|
|
2018/05/01 17:07:10
Subject: Re:8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Would a Rhino be viable in updated lists? Or at least a single one if it fills up 2000 points?
|
|
|
|
2018/05/01 17:49:35
Subject: 8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Painlord Titan Princeps of Slaanesh
|
It depends on the rest of the list. If you're just looking to spend points then you'd be better buying a couple more troops.
|
|
|
|
2018/05/01 22:37:34
Subject: 8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Terrifying Wraith
|
List from London GT. Player going essentially pure GK. Should be interesting to see how it turns out.
Player name: Michael Cook
Army Faction: Grey Knights
Total command points: 8
Total army points: 1999
Battalion Detachment [1284] +5cp
HQ1: Grand Master Nemesis DreadKnight [190] + gatling psilencer + Heavy Psycannon + Nemesis Great sword + teleporter [260] – WARLORD (first to the fray)
HQ2: Kaldor Draigo [240]
Troop1: 5 Strike squad [95] – 5 Twin falchions (0), 5 Storm bolters [105]
Troop2: 5 Strike squad [95] – 5 Twin falchions (0), 5 Storm bolters [105]
Troop3: 5 Grey Knight terminators [205] – 4 Halberds (0), Hammer, 5 storm bolters [228]
Flyer1: Stormraven gunship [192] – Twin multimelta, Twin lascannon, 2 x stormstrike missiles + 2 Hurricane bolters [346]
Outrider Detachment [503] +1cp
HQ1: Brother Champion [113] – Nemesis force sword (0), storm bolter [115]
Fast1: 5 Interceptor squad [115] – 5 Twin falchions (0), 5 Storm bolters[125]
Fast2: 5 Interceptor squad [115] – 5 Twin falchions (0), 5 Storm bolters[125]
Fast3: 5 Interceptor squad [115] – 5 Twin falchions (0), 5 Storm bolters, [125]
Auxiliary detachment [225] -1cp
Hq1: Saint Celestine [200] + Gemini [25]
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/05/01 22:39:02
|
|
|
|
2018/05/02 00:48:38
Subject: 8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Warning From Magnus? Not Listening!
|
Thenord wrote:
Great, but it kinda sucks that we have to include a batallion of IG to work..
Or some tactical marines.... Interesting choice from the guy who ran UM
Bartali wrote:I'd imagine those tournaments weren't running the beta deep strike rule ?
Going by the third list which had a soup detatchment with Assasins in, I'd guess not
|
My P&M blog
DC:90S++G+++M+B+IPw40k04#+D+A+++/cWD241R++T(T)DM+ |
|
|
|
2018/05/02 09:43:38
Subject: 8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Zarroc1733 wrote:
Q: If you use a Stratagem to remove a model from the battlefield
and set it up again, does the model retain any persistent effects
(for example, a bonus to one of its characteristics as a result of
an ability)?
A: No
Well damn, that will really hurt my list.The 2+ save was really helping my lists survivability by turning the GMDK in a firepower sponge
|
|
|
|
|
2018/05/02 13:37:13
Subject: 8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
Phoenix, AZ, USA
|
GuardStrider wrote: Zarroc1733 wrote:
Q: If you use a Stratagem to remove a model from the battlefield
and set it up again, does the model retain any persistent effects
(for example, a bonus to one of its characteristics as a result of
an ability)?
A: No
Well damn, that will really hurt my list.The 2+ save was really helping my lists survivability by turning the GMDK in a firepower sponge
Gate isn’t a Stratagem so it shouldn’t have any effect on bonus already applied by a Stratagem. At least, not per the quoted Q&A.
SJ
|
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world.”
- Ephesians 6:12
|
|
|
|
2018/05/02 13:41:11
Subject: 8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Painlord Titan Princeps of Slaanesh
|
There is an extropolation that removing a model from the board (which GoI does) removes any effects that the model had on it previously. So putting +1 Sv on a model and then removing the model from the board via GoI would then remove the +1 persistant effect.
|
|
|
|
2018/05/02 14:20:53
Subject: 8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Terrifying Wraith
|
Leo_the_Rat wrote:There is an extropolation that removing a model from the board (which GoI does) removes any effects that the model had on it previously. So putting +1 Sv on a model and then removing the model from the board via GoI would then remove the +1 persistant effect.
Is that fair though? To make the assumption that is what is implied? Or should we take the question as it was asked and apply it only to the ruling of strategems.
|
|
|
|
|
2018/05/02 15:08:26
Subject: 8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Painlord Titan Princeps of Slaanesh
|
If you want to be very legal about it then all answers are only to be applied to the specific (and narrow) scope of the question asked. Most people will make a logical jump and say that if an answer applies to a specific situation and there is a similar situation that arises then the same answer should apply.
The answer says that if a model is removed from the board then all persistant effects on that model are no longer available when the model "reappears" on the board. GoI literally says to remove the unit from the board and then place it back onto the board. This seems to be analagous to the Q&A. As such, it is reasonable to assume that the same answer would apply to GoI. If you're unsure then feel free to ask the TO or your opponent how they would rule.
|
|
|
|
2018/05/02 15:16:26
Subject: 8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Damsel of the Lady
|
TheMostWize wrote:Leo_the_Rat wrote:There is an extropolation that removing a model from the board (which GoI does) removes any effects that the model had on it previously. So putting +1 Sv on a model and then removing the model from the board via GoI would then remove the +1 persistant effect.
Is that fair though? To make the assumption that is what is implied? Or should we take the question as it was asked and apply it only to the ruling of strategems.
It seems no bigger a jump than using the Death Guard FAQ answer allowing a stratagem to be used to take non-warlord faction relics being applied to every faction in the game.
|
|
|
|
2018/05/02 16:11:01
Subject: 8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
Phoenix, AZ, USA
|
The issue has more to do with GW’s poor use of language. The Q&A could have answered that any effect that removes a model from the table will also remover any persistent effect on that model regardless of whether or not the model is immediately returned to the table. But they didn’t. They answered a specific question with a specific answer, while ignoring how else they could have/should have answered to address the wider, more general question. Add to the situation that GW has contradictory rules in their Q&A’s, we cannot just apply a specific ruling to a general category.
That’s why the response is problematic.
SJ
|
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world.”
- Ephesians 6:12
|
|
|
|
2018/05/02 16:25:30
Subject: 8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Painlord Titan Princeps of Slaanesh
|
That's why I said that you should talk it over with the TO or your opponent. My stance would be that it does apply to other effects.
|
|
|
|
2018/05/03 13:48:54
Subject: 8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Guarded Grey Knight Terminator
|
TheMostWize wrote:List from London GT. Player going essentially pure GK. Should be interesting to see how it turns out.
Player name: Michael Cook
Army Faction: Grey Knights
Total command points: 8
Total army points: 1999
Battalion Detachment [1284] +5cp
HQ1: Grand Master Nemesis DreadKnight [190] + gatling psilencer + Heavy Psycannon + Nemesis Great sword + teleporter [260] – WARLORD (first to the fray)
HQ2: Kaldor Draigo [240]
Troop1: 5 Strike squad [95] – 5 Twin falchions (0), 5 Storm bolters [105]
Troop2: 5 Strike squad [95] – 5 Twin falchions (0), 5 Storm bolters [105]
Troop3: 5 Grey Knight terminators [205] – 4 Halberds (0), Hammer, 5 storm bolters [228]
Flyer1: Stormraven gunship [192] – Twin multimelta, Twin lascannon, 2 x stormstrike missiles + 2 Hurricane bolters [346]
Outrider Detachment [503] +1cp
HQ1: Brother Champion [113] – Nemesis force sword (0), storm bolter [115]
Fast1: 5 Interceptor squad [115] – 5 Twin falchions (0), 5 Storm bolters[125]
Fast2: 5 Interceptor squad [115] – 5 Twin falchions (0), 5 Storm bolters[125]
Fast3: 5 Interceptor squad [115] – 5 Twin falchions (0), 5 Storm bolters, [125]
Auxiliary detachment [225] -1cp
Hq1: Saint Celestine [200] + Gemini [25]
I like this list minus the terminators. Maybe they will do work.
|
"Glory in our suffering, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope. And hope does not disappoint"
-Paul of Tarsus
If my post seems goofy, assume I am posting from my phone and the autocorrect elf in my phone is drunk again |
|
|
|
2018/05/04 01:09:12
Subject: 8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Unshakeable Grey Knight Land Raider Pilot
|
The maths is a bit off for that list isn't it? Its going to a GT?
Stormraven should be 358 points, and the GMDK is missing the mandatory dreadfist, so should be 285.
|
|
|
|
2018/05/07 01:52:35
Subject: 8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Guarded Grey Knight Terminator
|
Has anyone tried out a Libby with a stormshield + staff + curiass of sacrifice? Can tank like a boss I would assume. Or use storm shield + heed the prognisticars + curiass + falcions?
Could use him like a lone wolf, just go off on his own since he doesn't actually benefit the rest of the army.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/05/07 02:36:57
"Glory in our suffering, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope. And hope does not disappoint"
-Paul of Tarsus
If my post seems goofy, assume I am posting from my phone and the autocorrect elf in my phone is drunk again |
|
|
|
2018/05/07 04:25:31
Subject: 8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Warning From Magnus? Not Listening!
|
Smotejob wrote:Has anyone tried out a Libby with a stormshield + staff + curiass of sacrifice? Can tank like a boss I would assume. Or use storm shield + heed the prognisticars + curiass + falcions?
Could use him like a lone wolf, just go off on his own since he doesn't actually benefit the rest of the army.
I liked the stave / shield combo when he could tank for other characters, but now that he can't, it's less appealing. I can't see too many situations where I'd want my libby going solo enough to sink extra points / CP into him - I think it's probably easier and more cost efficient just to screen him with other units
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/05/07 04:25:51
My P&M blog
DC:90S++G+++M+B+IPw40k04#+D+A+++/cWD241R++T(T)DM+ |
|
|
|
2018/05/07 13:40:09
Subject: 8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Guarded Grey Knight Terminator
|
Just trying to think of ways to use my Libby I spent time and energy converting a while back. He is pretty useless right now with other grey knights on the field.
|
"Glory in our suffering, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope. And hope does not disappoint"
-Paul of Tarsus
If my post seems goofy, assume I am posting from my phone and the autocorrect elf in my phone is drunk again |
|
|
|
2018/05/07 18:29:58
Subject: Re:8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Judgemental Grey Knight Justicar
|
In this post-FAQ world, I decided to try my GK with some Custodes friends at a tournament this weekend. 4 rounds, 1600 points, just under 50 players. The TO had put out a mission packet ahead of time so we knew what types of missions to expect. I took 2nd overall and went 4-0 with the following list:
GK Battalion
Voldus- Warlord
Crowe
6- Strike Squad: 1 Psilencer
5- Strike Squad: 1 Psilencer
5- Strike Squad: 1 Psilencer
7- Paladins: 2 Psilencers
Custodes Supreme Command
3- Shield Captains on Jetbikes: Salvo Launcher on all
Nearly all my games went to turn 5-6. My army did not murder so much as it just endured, and outlasted my opponents. The loss of the alpha strike made for the GK to be less fun to play, but the boost in survivability was great. I only went first in 1 game. I used Voldus to buff the Paladins with Sanctuary and Hammerhand, and sent them at whatever needed to die by Gating them turn 1 in 3/4 games. He would then Gate after them and follow around. In the only game I played recklessly with Voldus and got him killed (Screamers of Tzeentch are nasty), I used the Shoulder the Mantle Stratagem to make a Custode my Warlord, denying a point to my opponent. Even Crowe had his shining moment against Tyranids by getting into some Termagants and then Genestealers and tearing through them with his stick.
|
|
|
|
|
2018/05/07 20:20:11
Subject: 8th Ed. Grey Knight Tactica Discussion - Mathhammer Pg. 9
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
What gave you a boost in survivability?
|
|
|
|
|