So...Was it /ever/ called a March FAQ?

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**vaklor4**

Because im starting to doubt that the company ever explicitly said 'march', just twice a year. I'm not clambering for the FAQ in all honesty, but it puzzles me that we didn't end up getting it in March at all.

**Formosa**

it explicitly said march, it also explicitly said it was being delayed and for good reason.

**BaconCatBug**

vaklor4 wrote:
Because im starting to doubt that the company ever explicitly said 'march', just twice a year. I'm not clambering for the FAQ in all honesty, but it puzzles me that we didn't end up getting it in March at all.

https://www.warhammer-community.com/2017/12/15/the-future-of-faqs-and-chapter-approved-dec-15gw-homepage-post-2/

2: Big, Twice-a-year FAQs
Major game-wide questions will be answered on a biannual basis each March and September when a wider set of FAQ updates will be released. These will be focused on anything that might emerge as more codexes, and thus more unusual interactions, make their way into the game and will address issues across multiple factions and publications. We’ll also use these to address balance issues in the game, so these might include a few changes to rules for overly powerful, or underrepresented units.

**AdmiralHalsey**

BaconCatBug wrote:
vaklor4 wrote:
Because im starting to doubt that the company ever explicitly said 'march', just twice a year. I'm not clambering for the FAQ in all honesty, but it puzzles me that we didn't end up getting it in March at all.
https://www.warhammer-community.com/2017/12/15/the-future-of-faqs-and-chapter-approved-dec-15gw-homepage-post-2/

2: Big, Twice-a-year FAQs
Major game-wide questions will be answered on a biannual basis each March and September when a wider set of FAQ updates will be released. These will be focused on anything that might emerge as more codexes, and thus more unusual interactions, make their way into the game and will address issues across multiple factions and publications. We’ll also use these to address balance issues in the game, so these might include a few changes to rules for overly powerful, or underrepresented units.

Could you use bigger font next time BCB? I don't think I quite figured out what you were trying to say.

**vaklor4**

BaconCatBug wrote:
vaklor4 wrote:
Because im starting to doubt that the company ever explicitly said 'march', just twice a year. I'm not clambering for the FAQ in all honesty, but it puzzles me that we didn't end up getting it in March at all.
https://www.warhammer-community.com/2017/12/15/the-future-of-faqs-and-chapter-approved-dec-15gw-homepage-post-2/

2: Big, Twice-a-year FAQs
Major game-wide questions will be answered on a biannual basis each March and September when a wider set of FAQ updates will be released. These will be focused on anything that might emerge as more codexes, and thus more unusual interactions, make their way into the game and will address issues across multiple factions and publications. We’ll also use these to address balance issues in the game, so these might include a few changes to rules for overly powerful, or underrepresented units.

I can't quite read those two middle words. Did you downsize them or something? Jokes aside, I just looked for myself. It makes sense to wait for Adepticon feedback, so good on GW!

**SemperMortis**

It is kind of weird seeing GW using common sense, though when they do it usually only looks like common sense until you get past the first layer and realize they still don't know wtf they are doing...Looking at you Chapter Approved.

**Lemondish**

SemperMortis wrote:
It is kind of weird seeing GW using common sense, though when they do it usually only looks like common sense until you get past the first layer and realize they still don't know wtf they are doing...Looking at you Chapter Approved.

Didn't take long to see someone take a petty, whining stab at GW. Thanks for always being there when we need you

**vaklor4**

SemperMortis wrote:
It is kind of weird seeing GW using common sense, though when they do it usually only looks like common sense until you get past the first layer and realize they still don't know wtf they are doing...Looking at you Chapter Approved.

I could say a lot to this. Instead, I will simply use this.

**DCannon4Life**

Pro Tip: AdeptiCon is at the (very) end of March next year; the FaQ will likely be in April again, though before Easter.

Cheers

**tneva82**

Well there's always more tournaments next so arbitary delay anyway. Balance is also bad reason as game won't be any more balanced. Getting the real meat(unclear rules) would be more important so it would have been better to release it sooner