Switch Theme:

Weird Photo Upload Phenomena  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in ca
Stormin' Stompa






Ottawa, ON

I've recently uploaded two photos to the gallery. Both images prior to upload were sharp and in focus; but once uploaded, the images look blurry and out of focus. If I go to the image in the gallery and zoom in the image snaps into focus. I'm using a Nikon digital camera (can't remember the model number).

Any idea why this might be happening?

Image for reference.
Spoiler:

Ask yourself: have you rated a gallery image today? 
   
Made in au
Grizzled Space Wolves Great Wolf





Is it just because the version that gets posted to the forum is lower quality so that people viewing it in the forum (opposed to the gallery) don't have to download a high res version?

While 56kbps isn't a thing anymore, I imagine people viewing from mobile devices might not want to be downloading pics that are in the megabytes range without knowing.
   
Made in us
Last Remaining Whole C'Tan






Pleasant Valley, Iowa

Yes, the images are reduced in quality to save on bandwidth, but I think what you have going on is something else. In my experience uploading images with a very large resolution causes the situation you are experiencing. You're uploading images at 3871x2177, which is larger than the gallery software seems to like.

Spoiler:



8064x6048


4032x3024


1920x1440


1600x1200


1280x960


Highest vs lowest



As you can see from the preview pictures, the largest image looks objectively the worst when resized into a medium size preview. The smaller ones look dramatically better. This is an algorithmic shortcoming. Of course, the smaller resolution images look much worse when you scroll in, because they are much lower resolution. So, what to do?

If people are mostly going to be viewing your images as-is in the gallery, I'd suggest resizing to 1920x1200 max before uploading. You're going to be peeking through a 800x450 porthole, anyway.

If you're going to be embedding your images inside forum postings or articles for use on the site, then I'd recommend still using 1920x1200 or thereabouts anyway, but picking the full size option when picking a link and embedding them full size.




This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2018/06/25 14:56:01


 lord_blackfang wrote:
Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.

 Flinty wrote:
The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock
 
   
Made in ca
Stormin' Stompa






Ottawa, ON

Thank you for the information, I'm glad it's something straightforward.

I'll have to look into resizing my photos in the future.

Ask yourself: have you rated a gallery image today? 
   
Made in us
Last Remaining Whole C'Tan






Pleasant Valley, Iowa

If you don't already have software for this, The Gimp is free, runs on pretty much all desktop OS's, and pretty good. It's got a bit of a learning curve for complex stuff but resizing is very simple.

 lord_blackfang wrote:
Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.

 Flinty wrote:
The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock
 
   
Made in gb
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch





UK

If you just paste in the forum code for the full sized image the forum will resize it to fit the thread without making it blurry.

Spoiler:




Great paint job by the way

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2018/06/25 16:06:24


[1,800] Chaos Knights | [1,250] Thousand Sons | [1,000] Grey Knights | 40K editions: RT, 8, 9, 10 | https://www.flickr.com/photos/dreadblade/  
   
Made in ca
Stormin' Stompa






Ottawa, ON

 Brother Castor wrote:
If you just paste in the forum code for the full sized image the forum will resize it to fit the thread without making it blurry.

Spoiler:




Great paint job by the way


Strange, that's what I've been doing. Bottom right at the gallery image, right?

Ask yourself: have you rated a gallery image today? 
   
Made in gb
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch





UK

Quote my post and yours and look at the different URL in the forum code I pasted.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2018/07/14 17:58:49


[1,800] Chaos Knights | [1,250] Thousand Sons | [1,000] Grey Knights | 40K editions: RT, 8, 9, 10 | https://www.flickr.com/photos/dreadblade/  
   
Made in us
Last Remaining Whole C'Tan






Pleasant Valley, Iowa

 Brother Castor wrote:
If you just paste in the forum code for the full sized image the forum will resize it to fit the thread without making it blurry.


It will not resize the image to fit in the thread unless it's in a spoiler tag. If the image exceeds your current display resolution it will add a horizontal scroll bar.

 lord_blackfang wrote:
Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.

 Flinty wrote:
The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock
 
   
Made in gb
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch





UK

 Ouze wrote:

It will not resize the image to fit in the thread unless it's in a spoiler tag. If the image exceeds your current display resolution it will add a horizontal scroll bar.

What browser are you using? On Chrome it resizes without spoiler tags:



I have noticed that automatic resizing only works after submitting though, preview shows it at it's original resolution.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/06/26 16:37:36


[1,800] Chaos Knights | [1,250] Thousand Sons | [1,000] Grey Knights | 40K editions: RT, 8, 9, 10 | https://www.flickr.com/photos/dreadblade/  
   
Made in us
Last Remaining Whole C'Tan






Pleasant Valley, Iowa

Oh man, I am not sure I ever bothered to submit after seeing a giant image break the thread in preview - this whole time I have been spoilering for nothing!


 lord_blackfang wrote:
Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.

 Flinty wrote:
The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock
 
   
Made in gb
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch





UK

Yeah, I only worked all this out after much trial and error having seen that some people clearly already knew the secret of posting non-blurry gallery photos!

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/06/26 13:42:17


[1,800] Chaos Knights | [1,250] Thousand Sons | [1,000] Grey Knights | 40K editions: RT, 8, 9, 10 | https://www.flickr.com/photos/dreadblade/  
   
Made in ca
Stormin' Stompa






Ottawa, ON

Mr Nobody wrote:I've recently uploaded two photos to the gallery. Both images prior to upload were sharp and in focus; but once uploaded, the images look blurry and out of focus. If I go to the image in the gallery and zoom in the image snaps into focus. I'm using a Nikon digital camera (can't remember the model number).

Any idea why this might be happening?

Image for reference.
Spoiler:


Brother Castor wrote:If you just paste in the forum code for the full sized image the forum will resize it to fit the thread without making it blurry.

Spoiler:




Great paint job by the way


okay, so it looks like you just have to cut out the descriptive from the code with percentile signs and replace an underscore with a dash. I'll have to remember that.Gallery image is still weird, but I'll just have to resize the image before uploading.

I don't know how you managed to figure that out but I am impressed.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2018/08/13 23:31:38


Ask yourself: have you rated a gallery image today? 
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




UK

Resize AND sharpen before uploading.

Resizing in itself deletes data and often as not it will soften the final photo. However a quick sharpen before and after resizing will help you preserve the sharpness; in fact done this way the shot will often appear sharper.

My camera puts out photos at around 5K pixels on the longest side and my method is

Sharpen
Resize to 2500 pixels on the longest side
sharpen
Resize to 1000 pixels on the longest side
sharpen

Note that the second and third sharpening passes are often very light and the last one is often a a very low value of sharpening. Basically just touching up after the resize.

A Blog in Miniature

3D Printing, hobbying and model fun! 
   
Made in gb
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch





UK

Mr Nobody wrote:

okay, so it looks like you just have to cut out the descriptive from the code with percentile signs and replace an underscore with a dash. I'll have to remember that.Gallery image is still weird, but I'll just have to resize the image before uploading.


If you select full size from the list above the code you copy from the gallery it will give you the correct URL.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2018/07/14 17:58:16


[1,800] Chaos Knights | [1,250] Thousand Sons | [1,000] Grey Knights | 40K editions: RT, 8, 9, 10 | https://www.flickr.com/photos/dreadblade/  
   
 
Forum Index » Nuts & Bolts
Go to: