Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/07/25 22:38:27
Subject: Which codexes are the "poop" codexes?
|
 |
[DCM]
Dankhold Troggoth
|
craggy wrote:The poop codex? I mean... Its gotta be Death Guard, right? I mean, from a fluff standpoint.
Well done, craggy
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/07/25 23:32:57
Subject: Which codexes are the "poop" codexes?
|
 |
Clousseau
|
Quickjager wrote:My fething eyes, that format.
Looks like a pretty basic list that creates a very large spread out footprint on the board. with a Jumppack LIbby to supercharge a GMNDK or BA Captain.
I'm just not sure there is actually a good list this counters.
It's not a good list. But, it probably played and won one game, hence the rating. Maybe it's there to screw over Poxwalkers and Cultists based Death Guard?
|
Galas wrote:I remember when Marmatag was a nooby, all shiney and full of joy. How playing the unbalanced mess of Warhammer40k in a ultra-competitive meta has changed you 
Bharring wrote:He'll actually *change his mind* in the presence of sufficient/sufficiently defended information. Heretic. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/07/26 00:00:24
Subject: Which codexes are the "poop" codexes?
|
 |
Omnipotent Necron Overlord
|
Okay so - crazy talk time. Feel free to disagree with me. I would much rather bring pure GK to a game than pure Ultras. You've just got a lot better match ups.
This list for example.
GMDK Psycannon Psilencer teleporter and sword
Voldus
10 strikes hammer
10 strikes hammer
10 strikes hammer
10 strikes hammer
5 strikes
5 strikes
3x razors with twin AC and HKM
That list kills about 120 cultists a turn in just shooting. It completely shuts down their psychic phase too. It would rofl stomp these cultist lists.
Plenty of powerful list would also burn this list. NP.
It's got some really good matchups against powerful armies though.
|
If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced.
- Fox Mulder |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/07/26 00:04:39
Subject: Which codexes are the "poop" codexes?
|
 |
Clousseau
|
I just don't see it as threatening, sorry. You're spending 840 points for 160 dice at most if ALL of them end up in Rapid Fire range and none die before getting to shoot. For instance, if this worked, Devourer Termagants /w a Trygon would be the ultimate hotness, as it puts out 180 shots at 18" (with Single Minded Annihilation). And, Termagants with a Trygon aren't viable anymore at all after beta changes. We just don't know what list this beat. My guess is it was something pretty mediocre.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/07/26 00:08:15
Galas wrote:I remember when Marmatag was a nooby, all shiney and full of joy. How playing the unbalanced mess of Warhammer40k in a ultra-competitive meta has changed you 
Bharring wrote:He'll actually *change his mind* in the presence of sufficient/sufficiently defended information. Heretic. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/07/26 00:34:19
Subject: Which codexes are the "poop" codexes?
|
 |
Omnipotent Necron Overlord
|
Marmatag wrote:I just don't see it as threatening, sorry. You're spending 840 points for 160 dice at most if ALL of them end up in Rapid Fire range and none die before getting to shoot.
For instance, if this worked, Devourer Termagants /w a Trygon would be the ultimate hotness, as it puts out 180 shots at 18" (with Single Minded Annihilation). And, Termagants with a Trygon aren't viable anymore at all after beta changes.
We just don't know what list this beat. My guess is it was something pretty mediocre.
Most likely.
Not disagreeing with you. It's not a strong list - it's not gonna win tournaments. It could dominate some games though.
I've done the devil gaunt thing. It's easily countered - Intercept stratagem totally destroys it out of a trygon. At best you are shooting a unit they don't care about - and now it's turn 2!. Even Admech or marines can kill half the unit before it gets to shoot - eldar NP. It has more raw firepower than strikes for it's cost. It also dies from getting coughed at. In the next turn. If you deep struck 40 strikes - they aren't going to get blown away by intercept and they would probably kill almost every infantry in their army.
Before the beta rules I ran this list or some variation of it and it had a lot of success. Mostly because of the alpha strike.
The GK are a beta ruling away from almost being viable. Space marines are just trash.
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2018/07/26 00:39:03
If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced.
- Fox Mulder |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/07/26 01:09:48
Subject: Which codexes are the "poop" codexes?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
SHUPPET wrote: Xenomancers wrote:Slayer-Fan123 wrote:jcd386 wrote:Let's put aside any disagreement for a moment and just marvel at how terrible that amy list format is.
That's what happens when you copy paste from Battlescribe. I LOVE Battlescribe but it makes some of you guys super lazy.
I use battle scribe to make lists sometimes - but if I am going to post a list to Dakka... I just type it out. We aren't supposed to post points anyways.
I entirely agree. Battlescribe does not give good formatting, peoples laziness is atrocious, it's so much easier to read if you just type it out.
Well I think it formats fine when you're looking at it on the program, but when it comes to posting on here you need to type everything out for simplicity's sake.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/07/26 01:50:35
Subject: Which codexes are the "poop" codexes?
|
 |
Towering Hierophant Bio-Titan
|
Xenomancers wrote:Okay so - crazy talk time. Feel free to disagree with me. I would much rather bring pure GK to a game than pure Ultras. You've just got a lot better match ups.
This list for example.
GMDK Psycannon Psilencer teleporter and sword
Voldus
10 strikes hammer
10 strikes hammer
10 strikes hammer
10 strikes hammer
5 strikes
5 strikes
3x razors with twin AC and HKM
That list kills about 120 cultists a turn in just shooting. It completely shuts down their psychic phase too. It would rofl stomp these cultist lists.
Plenty of powerful list would also burn this list. NP.
It's got some really good matchups against powerful armies though.
Lol. Well, OK I definitely do disagree with that. Phew.
|
P.S.A. I won't read your posts if you break it into a million separate quotes and make an eyesore of it. |
|
 |
 |
|