Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Karol wrote:

have you heard about retcons that make no sense?

Yes, I know about Black Library's Horus Heresy books, but I'm not sure what that has to do with it. I was talking about the great fluff in the Imperial Knights codex.

 Crimson wrote:

Table wrote:

I don't think a aristocracy would send its daughters. Just saying.

Have you heard of Imperial Knights?

Knight families and planetary royalty are not the same.

Table wrote:

 Crimson wrote:

Table wrote:

I don't think a aristocracy would send its daughters. Just saying.

Have you heard of Imperial Knights?

Knight families and planetary royalty are not the same.

Have you actually read the codex - yes they are.

regarding making Imperial Knights the posterboys, Battletech is a good why on why not too
Let's look at Imperial knights in a cursory "sum them up in a few rods" sense. Knights are summed up as "Intersteller neo-feudal warriors driving giant one man operated war machines, priceless relics of the past" problem is if that is my MAJOR draw to a table top war game? why wouldn't I just play battletech? I get the same experiance, with a game more designed around it, for a cheaper price tag