Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

 kirotheavenger wrote:
It never says it's permanent

Does it have to though? Pure logic, can a unit that has already suffered a wound or glance/pen from this unit take a cover save? The answer is no, forever.


like 20 man tac squad, you shoot it and kill 2 turn 1, that unit, can now no longer ever take cover saves.



""An enemy model that suffers a Wound, Penetrating Hit or Glancing Hit inflicted by a Shooting Attack, made by a model with this
special rule that has not moved in the preceding Movement phase, may not take cover saves.""

Actually, it's per model. So if you zap a tactical legionary, they can't take a cover save ever again. The rest of their squad can.

Can we get back on topic and take the pointless gakposting elsewhere please? Thanks!

 BrookM wrote:
Can we get back on topic and take the pointless gakposting elsewhere please? Thanks!

We're literally discussing something related to the topic, I can give you a link

https://www.warhammer-community.com/2022/03/16/new-white-scars-and-emperors-children-units-clash-in-this-free-horus-heresy-mission/?fbclid=IwAR2NuaOy0_5g1AXbu4kCCuKw8Xt4aiaQNxuquFjWGArbfljFVi0hQAF8fP0

And more specifically this, because it has ramifications for the rumoured "leaked" 2.0 rules, literally the current title of this thread no less.

https://www.warhammer-community.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/V7pz4FAPFUM2apkb.pdf

This one specific rule has become a piece of new in and of itself, entire videos are being dedicated to parsing it out.









Automatically Appended Next Post:

Rihgu wrote:
Actually, it's per model. So if you zap a tactical legionary, they can't take a cover save ever again. The rest of their squad can.

So we'll be putting counters on multi wound models then? You're no wrong, it says per model.

That does not bode well for the amount of counters 2.0 will require if these remain in place.

Counters? now you're being more ridiculous.

It certainly is concerning if this is the level of rules writing we can expect for HH2.0.
However, I'm not too worried. It's more likely that the actual qualified designers are off working on 2.0, and they've either given the exemplary battles off to some poor intern, or otherwise have just hashed it in five minutes before home time on a Friday.

None of the leaked rules look like this. Which means discussing it even in that light is pretty pointless.

Less than five days to go until Adepticon.. I'm getting excited!

I'm trying not to think about it, hope is the first step on the road to disappointment, and it's a trail well travelled by GW!

I doubt the show anything at Adepticon.

Cause GW would still bullgaking us 1 Day before pre orders go live.

RazorEdge wrote:
I doubt the show anything at Adepticon.

Adepticon's a big event where they usually do show things. There's a high chance it gets shown there.

Especially considering they really didn't do anything for GAMA, which is out of the ordinary.

Cause GW would still bullgaking us 1 Day before pre orders go live.

lol, if they'd told you what it was back when the leak happened it would be vampirates all over again with every other week being "THIS HAS GOTTA BE IT!".

My guess is they show necromunda ash wastes at adepticon and then tease HH 2.0.

 jojo_monkey_boy wrote:
My guess is they show necromunda ash wastes at adepticon and then tease HH 2.0.

I have to think they'll at least tease something related to HH.

Are there any more daemon princes that might get a model?

 Yodhrin wrote:
Are there any more daemon princes that might get a model?

Not a daemon prince, but -

 Yodhrin wrote:
Are there any more daemon princes that might get a model?

Angron and Fulgrim were both ascended by the Siege but they will be kept for 40k so don't expect to see them in a HH reveal.
Most of the Daemons that could get models were only around at the endpoint of the Heresy, which is kind of the idea seeing as until then it could still be seen as just a civil war. The Siege is where it is fully revealed that most of the Traitor Legions are in the thrall of the Dark Gods with 3 Daemon Primarchs, Horus as a "living" conduit for the Gods, the Death Guard fully corrupted into Plague Marines and the rest starting to take the next step into sorcery, Daemonology and wider Chaos powers.

Don't get excited - it's just a Prætor!

I'm going to try really hard to expect nothing this time around... maybe I won't be disappointed then!

The 9th edition of 40K and the 3rd edition of AoS were both announced in May of their release years. So if 30k 2nd edition is going to fill the same spot, it’s too early to announce it. I would love some more praetors though! Or the return of some discontinued kits. Or maybe an Arlatax model for Mechanicum.

People on Discord have confirmed it's 2.0, with final release allegedly June/July

"confirmed". just people chasing clout hoping to get lucky. We do this same song and dance every time one of the previews pops up "I have it under good authority that this time the preview will be for that thing we've all be waiting for, trust me, I have a really reliable source".

I hope this was only a joke...



https://twitter.com/WarComTeam/status/1505914627128893441?

The Belesarius... something I can't read.

 zedmeister wrote:
Don't get excited - it's just a Prætor!

It's a limited edition special scenic base for Kabandah!

RazorEdge wrote:
I hope this was only a joke...

Spoiler:

https://twitter.com/WarComTeam/status/1505914627128893441?

You could have taken a minute of your time and checked.

That image is someone's reply to the Warhammer Community post detailing what would be shown at the event.

A tweet that follows 16 accounts and has made exactly one tweet with nothing in the way of likes or retweets. Veeeery reputable.

I hope that's not real. It's just a Primaris beaky, and the beaky helm does not fit well with the Primaris gorget, looks lame as hell to me (someone that loves beakies), plus there's no other HH design elements like the backpack, rimless shoulders etc etc, literally just a Primaris with a beaky hat.

RazorEdge wrote:
I hope this was only a joke...

As others have said - it's fake. The original image is from 2019:

It's so obviously baiting it's not worth the discussion.

 H.B.M.C. wrote:
The Belesarius... something I can't read.

"The Belisarian Age". Sticking a Mk. VI helmet on a Primaris is made more effective at riling up people if you throw in a reference to the Sigmarization of Horus Heresy. Bit heavy-handed, but hey, the things you do to get people to freak out, eh?

I'd imagine it would be a reference to Belisarius' reconquest of the Western Roman Empire.

JWBS wrote:
I hope that's not real. It's just a Primaris beaky, and the beaky helm does not fit well with the Primaris gorget, looks lame as hell to me (someone that loves beakies), plus there's no other HH design elements like the backpack, rimless shoulders etc etc, literally just a Primaris with a beaky hat.

What pict is this? URL?

This https://twitter.com/sliimegg/status/1505940230171332609/photo/1