Poll |
 |
|
 |
Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 04:29:00
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Pyromaniac Hellhound Pilot
|
Just trying to gauge how people would feel about this. I honestly hate the aesthetic of the Exorcist but like something like the Whirlwind. So would people make this into a big issue?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 04:34:21
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Charging Dragon Prince
|
I wouldn't be bothered at all, and would be even more convinced if somebody was to just throw on some Sisters bits and iconography to a Whirlwind.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 04:38:41
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Honestly I just wanna hear from the people here that would not like it. They're both Rhino chassis artillery. Get over it.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 04:51:47
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Gargantuan Gargant
|
As long as the size profile is accurately modelled and it's clear you're not trying to take advantage of any specific differences and you make it fairly clear to your opponent prior to the match, I don't think it matters. They may not let you do this though if you're in a tourney.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 04:52:40
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Terrifying Doombull
|
What, you don't like Abaddon being used a Roboute Guilliman? They're both space marine special characters. Get over it.
If you don't like the aesthetics and design of the army you picked, that sounds like a you problem.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2022/03/24 04:53:42
Efficiency is the highest virtue. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 05:05:01
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Preparing the Invasion of Terra
|
What specifically about the Exorcist do you not like? Is it the organ itself?
I don't think you'd be getting game refusals over it unless you just used a Whirlwind and made no effort to tie it into the general SoB aesthetic of Church-Tank.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 05:10:59
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Pyromaniac Hellhound Pilot
|
Gert wrote:What specifically about the Exorcist do you not like? Is it the organ itself?
I don't think you'd be getting game refusals over it unless you just used a Whirlwind and made no effort to tie it into the general SoB aesthetic of Church-Tank.
Yeah the organ and junk on top feels like so much overkill to me. And I would likely take the whirlwind turret and put it on a Sororitas Rhino, I think that would fit? If not then yeah I would deck a Space Marine whirlwind with sisters iconography.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 05:46:30
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
It's literally a rhino based vehicle that shoots missiles. I have no issues at all.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 07:25:31
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
DeathKorp_Rider wrote: Gert wrote:What specifically about the Exorcist do you not like? Is it the organ itself?
I don't think you'd be getting game refusals over it unless you just used a Whirlwind and made no effort to tie it into the general SoB aesthetic of Church-Tank.
Yeah the organ and junk on top feels like so much overkill to me. And I would likely take the whirlwind turret and put it on a Sororitas Rhino, I think that would fit? If not then yeah I would deck a Space Marine whirlwind with sisters iconography.
Here's what you need. A FW Exorcist. Sadly long oop. But also damned easy to just scratch build.
All 3 of mine are this pattern. I hated the organ version in it's original incarnation, so when FW made this I hit send as soon as I saw it.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 07:37:48
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Waaagh! Ork Warboss
Italy
|
I've already played against a SoB army using whirlwinds instead of exorcists. From more than a player actually, although that happened before 8th, when SoB were still an army of ancient models.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 09:55:59
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
I don't see why anyone would refuse that unless someone were to be playing some kind of Sister/Marine soup where confusion could happen. It's a tank that fires missiles and even the size police shouldn't be able to complain because the chassis is the same as well.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 10:18:15
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
As long as it has the heavy bolter modelled.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 11:08:57
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Inquisitorial Keeper of the Xenobanks
|
I love the organ version, so fun to paint and stage with floaty Birdy ribbons using magnets and yada, but sure, why not use a whirlwind base with some sob iconography?
|
. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 11:13:15
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
The Marine Standing Behind Marneus Calgar
|
Saw a lot of this back when WWs were plastic and exorcists were metal/hybrid kits. Even painted a couple for use as such.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 11:33:25
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Waaagh! Ork Warboss
Italy
|
So, you wouldn't accept the previous official Exorcist then since it only had the organ missile launcher and no heavy bolter modelled on it. Before 8th the Exorcist never had and couldn't take the heavy bolter.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2022/03/24 11:34:56
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 12:08:18
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Mekboy on Kustom Deth Kopta
|
No issues, especially if painted to the match the army. Bonus points if you add some sororitas bits to it, i would probably like it better than the official model that way
|
10000 points 7000
6000
5000
5000
2000
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 12:32:29
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Blackie wrote:
So, you wouldn't accept the previous official Exorcist then since it only had the organ missile launcher and no heavy bolter modelled on it. Before 8th the Exorcist never had and couldn't take the heavy bolter.
*Shrug* Be mad at GW for dicking about with the weapons for no good reason.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 13:19:59
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Arch Magos w/ 4 Meg of RAM
|
Voss wrote:What, you don't like Abaddon being used a Roboute Guilliman? They're both space marine special characters. Get over it.
If you don't like the aesthetics and design of the army you picked, that sounds like a you problem.
Lmao.
You can't be serious.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 13:40:42
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Annandale, VA
|
Voss wrote:What, you don't like Abaddon being used a Roboute Guilliman? They're both space marine special characters. Get over it.
If you don't like the aesthetics and design of the army you picked, that sounds like a you problem.
If someone converted an evil Guilliman to lead their Chaos army and used Abaddon rules, I'd be all for it.
Fun conversions that have zero risk of creating confusion for your opponent are always welcome.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 15:24:16
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Lord Damocles wrote: Blackie wrote:
So, you wouldn't accept the previous official Exorcist then since it only had the organ missile launcher and no heavy bolter modelled on it. Before 8th the Exorcist never had and couldn't take the heavy bolter.
*Shrug* Be mad at GW for dicking about with the weapons for no good reason.
So long as you keep it to yourself.
My Exorcists don't have heavy bolters. Therefore they won't be firing heavy bolters at you.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 16:26:48
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Dolnikan wrote:I don't see why anyone would refuse that unless someone were to be playing some kind of Sister/Marine soup where confusion could happen. It's a tank that fires missiles and even the size police shouldn't be able to complain because the chassis is the same as well.
Why would there be confusion? You're not going to using both rules at once.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 16:30:25
Subject: Re:Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Last Remaining Whole C'Tan
|
I would of course have no problem with it, but I would greatly prefer - as many have said - that this was a Sororitas-themed Whirlwind, ie with Sororitas livery and bits, and not an Ultramarine Whirlwind just sitting there.
I definitely think the Exorcist pretty over the top. I like it, but I see why people would not. Same with the Immolator.
|
lord_blackfang wrote:Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.
Flinty wrote:The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 16:31:21
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Terrifying Doombull
|
VladimirHerzog wrote:Voss wrote:What, you don't like Abaddon being used a Roboute Guilliman? They're both space marine special characters. Get over it.
If you don't like the aesthetics and design of the army you picked, that sounds like a you problem.
Lmao.
You can't be serious.
No, I'm not. I quite like seeing well-done conversions. The tone of the dismissal of any contrary opinion just struck me as open to absurdity.
|
Efficiency is the highest virtue. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 16:42:16
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Voss wrote: VladimirHerzog wrote:Voss wrote:What, you don't like Abaddon being used a Roboute Guilliman? They're both space marine special characters. Get over it.
If you don't like the aesthetics and design of the army you picked, that sounds like a you problem.
Lmao.
You can't be serious.
No, I'm not. I quite like seeing well-done conversions. The tone of the dismissal of any contrary opinion just struck me as open to absurdity.
Yeah and anyone not okay with it should be dismissed. What's your point?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 17:10:38
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I may actually convert a few Sisters Whirlwinds down the road too. I love the Exorcist kit, but I've always thought of them as special shrine/ command vehicles. In a huge onslaught game, I think it would be awesome to have one full Exorcist as the mobile shrine/ command and a couple more practical work horse fighting machines as back-up.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 17:19:46
Subject: Re:Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Ancient Venerable Dark Angels Dreadnought
|
I have more of an issue with someone who doesn't like the exorcist. I mean, let's be serious, it's absolutely glorious!!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 17:41:47
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Pyromaniac Hellhound Pilot
|
I guess that leads me to ask, is a Sororitas Rhino the same model as a SM Rhino with different accessories?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 17:49:11
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
The Marine Standing Behind Marneus Calgar
|
DeathKorp_Rider wrote:I guess that leads me to ask, is a Sororitas Rhino the same model as a SM Rhino with different accessories?
Looking at the sprue pics, yes.
The exorcist is a completely separate kit these days, but used to be an add-on to the rhino kit.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 17:54:16
Subject: Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
DeathKorp_Rider wrote:I guess that leads me to ask, is a Sororitas Rhino the same model as a SM Rhino with different accessories?
Yes, the SoB bitz are on their own sprue.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/03/24 17:55:31
Subject: Re:Would you accept a Whirlwind as a Substitute for an Exorcist?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
bullyboy wrote:I have more of an issue with someone who doesn't like the exorcist. I mean, let's be serious, it's absolutely glorious!!
You're right, it is glorious:
|
|
 |
 |
|