Switch Theme:

Dakka's 40K Rules Discussion Articles  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
[ADMIN]
President of the Mat Ward Fan Club






Los Angeles, CA

Looking to read well thought out treatises dissecting tough rules issues about the game of Warhammer 40,000?


Well, look no further than Dakka's 40K rules discussion articles, including:


  • How to Have an Intelligent Rules Debate by Centurian99

  • YMTC - How YOU Play the Game of 40k, a series of polls dedicated to finding out how players actually *play* some of the trickier situations in the 40k rules.




  • This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/05/11 06:14:47


    I play (click on icons to see pics): DQ:70+S++G(FAQ)M++B-I++Pw40k92/f-D+++A+++/areWD104R+T(D)DM+++
    yakface's 40K rule #1: Although the rules allow you to use modeling to your advantage, how badly do you need to win your toy soldier games?
    yakface's 40K rule #2: Friends don't let friends start a MEQ army.
    yakface's 40K rule #3: Codex does not ALWAYS trump the rulebook, so please don't say that!
    Waaagh Dakka: click the banner to learn more! 
       
     
    Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
    Go to: