Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

This is an automated message added by the articles system.

A new article titled Guard Doctrines - The Bad, the Worse, and the Mandatory has been added to the dakka articles system.

This message thread is for the discussion of content in the article. Any updates to the article will be automatically added to this thread and (if you are logged in), you can get automatic email updates as and when the article changes by clicking 'Email me when this thread changes' below. If you are the author or have added a lot to the article then it is a good idea to do this to ensure that you maintain control over the content of the article.

If you have anything to add to the article, then just jump in and edit it by going to the actual article page and clicking 'edit' (the link can be found just above the article). If there is no edit link then the article is locked for now, so just add your comments or content to this thread and if they are appropriate and the article owner checks this thread, they should get merged in.

If there is something in the article that you wish to debate, then this is the place to do it. Just hit the reply button and get chatting. You need to be registered and logged in to post in the forums so if you are an anonymous article editor then now would be a great time to register and join in dakka's great forum discussion!

I already tried to persuade HBMC to add a section on how Cities of Death affects his view of Doctrine choices- am I the only one or is anybody else interested?

I'm interested, but you could either spin-off your own article
or edit into HBMC's. I think in this case a Related Article
would be best.

malfred wrote:I'm interested, but you could either spin-off your own article or edit into HBMC's.

I wouldn't dream of either. My IG experience is all theoretical or from the other side of the table, and all of that opposite the same player (since the introduction of Dcotrines, at least). I could say what looks good on paper or anecdotally, but I'd rather not pass myself off as an authority w/o a decent amount of experience using IG. There's a reason 95% of my posts in Army Lists over the years have been in Deathwing and NOT other armies- stick with what you know.

You could start a thread in 40k Tactics with what you think
and then lure out a Cent99, HBMC and Stelek free for all.

I've got popcorn.

malfred wrote:You could start a thread in 40k Tactics with what you think
and then lure out a Cent99, HBMC and Stelek free for all.

I've got popcorn.

That sounds even better than our Plastruct date.

Always a nice read when considering IG options available.

Thanks for taking the time and effort to put this together!

al-Majid Agandhjin bin Ahfal al-Rashid