Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/21 20:10:22
Subject: The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
Tinkering Tech-Priest
|
The Dragon of Mars has long been a grey mysterious area of the 40k mythos.
However, it has been fleshed out more in the recent Horus Heresy book "Mechanicum". I recommend you read it! We can assume the following from the hints in the book, and the Necron codex:
1) It is a C'tan.
2) It is trapped in a cave in the Noctis Labyrinth.
3) It has a strong affinity with machines.
Now, we are into the realms of speculation here, but I think it is woken and freed in the 41st millenium.
I have 2 reasons to believe this:
1: I was told by a person who works at GW that the necrons will be updated 'sometime next year'. They will be gaining a new light vehicle and 'an extra c'tan'. This is probably the dragon.
2: A quote from 'Mechanicum': "Ten thousand years would pass before the next guardian was drawn to the Noctis Labyrinthus, but by then the damage had been done".
Now, the Horus Heresy occured 10,000 years before the age in which 40k is set, making it the close of the 31st millenium. Ten thousand years passing implies the next guardian is being drawn at the 'now' time of 40k. "The damage had been done" implies the Dragon somehow breaks free. This is backed up by the fact that in the 41st Millenium, the martian defences were breached by a necron ship, which landed near the Noctis Labyrinth and was destroyed. Things are in motion. (Could be a good scenario for a game, sometime.)
The purpose of this thread is to piece together scraps of info about the Dragon, in the hope of building up a fuller picture. If anyone spots any scraps of info I missed in any of the Codexes or older editions of the Rulebook, please post them here!
|
This is Daemonic Cheese:
3000 Pts
2500 Pts
1000 Pts (And growing)
I'd put a quote here, but XKCD would have a better one. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/21 20:27:18
Subject: Re:The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
Calculating Commissar
|
Interesting speculation! I wonder, if this is indeed the potential 'new C'Tan' that was hinted at (Assuming, of course, that it wasn't just a Redshirt trying to pitch some Necrons to you), what will it look like? I'm going to think something with some clearly mechanical elements to the 'body' of it. Perhaps something closer to the Necrons in appearance?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/21 20:30:10
Subject: Re:The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
Tinkering Tech-Priest
|
He certainly wasn't a redshirt, he was actually the store manager.
Yes, I'm thinking Nightbringer-sized floating robot with Mechadendrites!
Brilliant!
|
This is Daemonic Cheese:
3000 Pts
2500 Pts
1000 Pts (And growing)
I'd put a quote here, but XKCD would have a better one. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/21 20:32:25
Subject: The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
One of the rumors is that the C'Tan will go to APOC. Necron Lords would be able to upgrade into a mini-stargod sort of character, which would fit with the existing models. Then GW will just let Forgeworld make some huge resin mostrosity to go with the APOC for a C'Tan of epic size and pointcost.
|
In the dark future, there are skulls for everyone. But only the bad guys get spikes. And rivets for all, apparently welding was lost in the Dark Age of Technology. -from C.Borer |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/21 20:40:14
Subject: The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
Tinkering Tech-Priest
|
Oh, brilliant. If so, I'd glance at the price, faint, come round, and buy one.
|
This is Daemonic Cheese:
3000 Pts
2500 Pts
1000 Pts (And growing)
I'd put a quote here, but XKCD would have a better one. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/21 20:40:22
Subject: The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
Tinkering Tech-Priest
|
Oh, brilliant. If so, I'd glance at the price, faint, come round, and buy one.
|
This is Daemonic Cheese:
3000 Pts
2500 Pts
1000 Pts (And growing)
I'd put a quote here, but XKCD would have a better one. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/21 20:40:29
Subject: The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
Tinkering Tech-Priest
|
Oh god, triple post, sorry.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/07/21 20:40:59
This is Daemonic Cheese:
3000 Pts
2500 Pts
1000 Pts (And growing)
I'd put a quote here, but XKCD would have a better one. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/21 20:49:43
Subject: The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
Stealthy Dark Angels Scout with Shotgun
|
In Dark Crusade, when you destroy the necron base, their is the beacon of the void dragon that makes you loose control of your vehicles to the necrons. perhaps we will see something like that in its rule set.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/21 21:03:38
Subject: Re:The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
Calculating Commissar
|
Highly possible. Hmm... I'm seeing this C'tan to be some form of Necron Titan in both rules and size.
Scary thought IMHO
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/21 21:29:10
Subject: The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
Tinkering Tech-Priest
|
Hmm... That would be cool, I bit like a walking version of that necron strategem that lets you take over enemy vehicles?
Maybe it could also repair Necron vehicles? Hmm...
|
This is Daemonic Cheese:
3000 Pts
2500 Pts
1000 Pts (And growing)
I'd put a quote here, but XKCD would have a better one. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/21 21:39:52
Subject: The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
[MOD]
Solahma
|
The current Necron codex makes no bones about the fact that the Dragon is a C'tan. I wonder if GW will see fit to move the storyline along enough to get the dragon unleashed as a fully-fledged, playable model though. Would be cool to see a Mechanicum Codex a year or two after this happened, however.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/21 21:46:58
Subject: The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Chicago, Illinois
|
They should just do a codex like Eye of Terror where its Adeptus MEchanicus versus Necrons.
|
If I lose it is because I had bad luck, if you win it is because you cheated. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/21 21:52:07
Subject: Re:The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
Foolproof Falcon Pilot
Somewhere in the unknown universe.
|
|
Manchu wrote:Agamemnon2 wrote:
Congratulations, that was the stupidest remark the entire wargaming community has managed to produce in a long, long time.
Congratulations, your dismissive and conclusory commentary has provided nothing to this discussion or the wider community on whose behalf you arrogantly presume to speak nor does it engage in any meaningful way the remark it lamely targets. But you did manage to gain experience points toward your next level of internet tough guy. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/21 21:56:31
Subject: Re:The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
Calculating Commissar
|
The only thing that I can see hurting the chances of a model of the Dragon of Mars is the fact that it would mean the Necrons conquer Mars in a tide after it awakens and is released. That would put them right on Terra's doorstep and pretty much at direct blows with the Custodes, Grey Knights, Ad Mech, and Imperial Fists. It's a jump I don't really see GW making. Perhaps it will be a Void Dragon from another Ad Mech world, but I don't think it's likely going to be -the- Dragon.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/07/21 21:57:18
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/21 22:01:58
Subject: Re:The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
Foolproof Falcon Pilot
Somewhere in the unknown universe.
|
metallifan wrote:The only thing that I can see hurting the chances of a model of the Dragon of Mars is the fact that it would mean the Necrons conquer Mars in a tide after it awakens and is released. That would put them right on Terra's doorstep and pretty much at direct blows with the Custodes, Grey Knights, Ad Mech, and Imperial Fists. It's a jump I don't really see GW making. Perhaps it will be a Void Dragon from another Ad Mech world, but I don't think it's likely going to be -the- Dragon.
It could be an episode like 13th Black Crusade, 3rd Armageddon, and Medusa V. They could make a whole campaign thingy. They'd come out with some special mechanicus units (maybe that never before seen stuff or the new unknown codex that GW is releasing will be mechanicum). And the main armies would be SM (of course) Inquisition, Necrons, IG (with Mechanicum), and Eldar (they get everywhere). Maybe even DE, too (for poops and giggles).
|
Manchu wrote:Agamemnon2 wrote:
Congratulations, that was the stupidest remark the entire wargaming community has managed to produce in a long, long time.
Congratulations, your dismissive and conclusory commentary has provided nothing to this discussion or the wider community on whose behalf you arrogantly presume to speak nor does it engage in any meaningful way the remark it lamely targets. But you did manage to gain experience points toward your next level of internet tough guy. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/21 22:28:48
Subject: Re:The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
Member of the Malleus
|
I was under the impression that there are four living C'Tan left? In which case the Necrons could get one more without messing with the Void Dragon story.
The Void Dragon is unlikely to want to work with the necrons anyway as it has a "Good Working Relationship" with the mechanicum  i.e. it already has an army of loyal followers who are obsessed with mechanics and electronics
|
In a world gone mad, who is left to fight for truth, justice and all that gets you smashed for under a fiver....
First played 40k during 2nd edition, missed out 3rd and 4th, and haven't played 40k since 5th edition - but still read and occasionally paint |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/21 22:42:54
Subject: The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
Hoary Long Fang with Lascannon
|
The dragon cannot be released. It is the source of technical innovation on Mars through the link it has with the guardian and others. The Emperor has used it for millennia to slowly pry away the technological secrets of the necrons, and that is why the imperium's technology is more susceptible to necron control.
It is more likely that in the new codex the Necrons will reach a new stage of "awakening" where the tomb worlds will disgorge even more horrific machines from the stasis tombs to further the "great work" of sealing off the immaterium from reality, before converting the universe into one enormous farm for souls. The Dragon and the outsider will still remain mysterious counterweights to the Deceiver and Nightbringer.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/21 22:49:41
Subject: Re:The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
[MOD]
Solahma
|
Hollismason wrote:They should just do a codex like Eye of Terror where its Adeptus MEchanicus versus Necrons.
Exarch_Nektel wrote:It could be an episode like 13th Black Crusade, 3rd Armageddon, and Medusa V. They could make a whole campaign thingy. They'd come out with some special mechanicus units (maybe that never before seen stuff or the new unknown codex that GW is releasing will be mechanicum). And the main armies would be SM (of course) Inquisition, Necrons, IG (with Mechanicum), and Eldar (they get everywhere). Maybe even DE, too (for poops and giggles).
These are great ideas. But I agree with Metallifan in the final analysis: seems like to big a deal for GW to take on--especially after the 13th Black Crusade.
Durandal wrote:The Dragon and the outsider will still remain mysterious counterweights to the Deceiver and Nightbringer.
Interesting, please elaborate.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/07/21 22:52:17
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/21 23:13:50
Subject: Re:The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
Proud Triarch Praetorian
|
Manchu, I think what he say saying is, instead of The Dragon and The Outsider being up front Units that everybody knows about like The Nightbringer and The Deceiver, they will remain shadowed by mystery and remain in the fluff.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/21 23:51:51
Subject: Re:The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
[MOD]
Solahma
|
Dreadwinter wrote:Manchu, I think what he say saying is, instead of The Dragon and The Outsider being up front Units that everybody knows about like The Nightbringer and The Deceiver, they will remain shadowed by mystery and remain in the fluff.
Ah, thanks. That sounds like the most likely possibility to me.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/22 10:35:12
Subject: Re:The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Ok guys lets think logically here.
GW are redoing the necron codex for several reasons:
1. C'tan are not powerfull enough for gods
2. to extend the fluff
3. to give a variety of models and options
We know the void dragon had an affinity for machines and had more advanced/different pattern necrons under his control. Thus if you want to add loads of new units and a new section to the fluff the void dragon seems a logical choice and anyway in recent books the void dragon has been mentioned quite a bit, too much for nothing to happen.
But this leaves us with a few problems:
1. C'tan are still underpowered
2. Mars is either under necron control or took heavy losses
3. What about the outsider?
But we also know GW are considering (its highly likely that they will) moving C'tan to apoc only and beefing them up a bit to reflect their powers, so thats number one ticked off the list.
As others have mentioned a war for mars would be a terrific summer campaign to celebrate the new necron codex, using lots of planet strikey features obviously, so thats number 2 sorted.
Number three i am unsure of, either writing some fluff about him giving him a reason to still be locked away could work although it would be very interested to see him also included, along with his minions, in the new codex.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/30 10:38:41
Subject: The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
Dispassionate Imperial Judge
|
I think it's much more likely that the C'tan move to APOC only. Having the dragon awake would cause too many problems in the storyline.
Much more likely that the Necrons reach a new stage of awakening, resulting in more units becoming available, and the Necron Lord becomes more of an 'avatar' of one of the c'tan (kinda like Chaos Marks maybe)
If another c'tan IS introduced, I think it's much more likely that either
1. It's The Outsider
or
2. GW retcon the whole bit about there only being 4 left
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/30 10:41:22
Subject: The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
[MOD]
Solahma
|
ArbitorIan wrote:I think it's much more likely that the C'tan move to APOC only. Having the dragon awake would cause too many problems in the storyline.
Much more likely that the Necrons reach a new stage of awakening, resulting in more units becoming available, and the Necron Lord becomes more of an 'avatar' of one of the c'tan (kinda like Chaos Marks maybe)
Heartily agree.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/30 10:47:15
Subject: The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
Thunderhawk Pilot Dropping From Orbit
|
Well is there any fluff to support the Outsider, from what ive heard he's fiction.
Well how about Mars or a neigbouring planet (Pluto, i like pluto) Is achualy full on Necrons, they attack mars release The Dragon and get pushed back by Imperial forces.
The reason the C'tan were so weak in the current Necron codex is cause there only just been awoken and havnt regained all there power, next codex they are probaly Full God Mode.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/30 11:27:44
Subject: The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Xav wrote:Well is there any fluff to support the Outsider, from what ive heard he's fiction.
Well how about Mars or a neigbouring planet (Pluto, i like pluto) Is achualy full on Necrons, they attack mars release The Dragon and get pushed back by Imperial forces.
The reason the C'tan were so weak in the current Necron codex is cause there only just been awoken and havnt regained all there power, next codex they are probaly Full God Mode.
Read the most recent necron codex, the outsider is mentioned just as much as the other c'tan.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/30 13:11:47
Subject: The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
Foolproof Falcon Pilot
Somewhere in the unknown universe.
|
Ardensfax wrote:Hmm... That would be cool, I bit like a walking version of that necron strategem that lets you take over enemy vehicles?
Maybe it could also repair Necron vehicles? Hmm...
it would be like all three necron strategems in one!
But chances are, the Void Dragon will suck against tyranids. Automatically Appended Next Post: corpsesarefun wrote:Xav wrote:Well is there any fluff to support the Outsider, from what ive heard he's fiction.
Well how about Mars or a neigbouring planet (Pluto, i like pluto) Is achualy full on Necrons, they attack mars release The Dragon and get pushed back by Imperial forces.
The reason the C'tan were so weak in the current Necron codex is cause there only just been awoken and havnt regained all there power, next codex they are probaly Full God Mode.
Read the most recent necron codex, the outsider is mentioned just as much as the other c'tan.
Yes, but the Void Dragon is probably the new C'tan, telling from Mechanicum and the fact that the Outsider is bonkers off in another galaxy. Who knows, maybe he's the hive mind? It would make sense, considering that there are a bunch of C'tan conciousnesses inside of him driving him crazy.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/07/30 13:13:45
Manchu wrote:Agamemnon2 wrote:
Congratulations, that was the stupidest remark the entire wargaming community has managed to produce in a long, long time.
Congratulations, your dismissive and conclusory commentary has provided nothing to this discussion or the wider community on whose behalf you arrogantly presume to speak nor does it engage in any meaningful way the remark it lamely targets. But you did manage to gain experience points toward your next level of internet tough guy. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/30 13:19:53
Subject: The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
Thunderhawk Pilot Dropping From Orbit
|
There's Ctan conciousness inside the hive mind?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/30 13:26:50
Subject: The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
|
Xav wrote:There's Ctan conciousness inside the hive mind?
The Outsider is supposedly the Hive Mind, which actually makes sense since the Outsider went nuts at some point and left. It's ironic that he would choose to drown the galaxy with life rather than death.
|
People are like dice, a certain Frenchman said that. You throw yourself in the direction of your own choosing. People are free because they can do that. Everyone's circumstances are different, but no matter how small the choice, at the very least, you can throw yourself. It's not chance or fate. It's the choice you made. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/30 13:35:15
Subject: The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Xav wrote:There's Ctan conciousness inside the hive mind?
No, there isnt.
Cheese Elemental wrote:Xav wrote:There's Ctan conciousness inside the hive mind?
The Outsider is supposedly the Hive Mind, which actually makes sense since the Outsider went nuts at some point and left. It's ironic that he would choose to drown the galaxy with life rather than death.
No the outsider is nothing to do with the hive mind.
The hive mind is a collective psycic consciousness for the tyranid race rather than an actual being and the outsider is an antiwarp singular being, they are opposites.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/30 13:36:40
Subject: The Dragon Of Mars
|
 |
Thunderhawk Pilot Dropping From Orbit
|
Didnt read Exarch post properly.
It seems to make sense apart from a few things like, how could Chief Librarian Smurf look into the Hive Mind and not go mad if he's a crazy C'tan?
|
|
|
 |
 |
|