Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
|
2006/01/17 04:37:14
Subject: What's a 'standard size' Army?
|
|
Clousseau
|
So I'm getting my Khador back into gear, and if I field everything I've got (minus one caster), it's 585 points. I get the sense that either 350 or 500 points is the 'benchmark' size for an army (like 1500/1850 for 40k or 2000/2250 for WHFB), but is that really the case? Do people play 400-600 point games, or is the next one up really 750? How unwieldy does the game get at 500+ points (it's been a while since I've played)? Just for reference, my list is: Sorcha (regular version) Destroyer Juggernaut Eiyriss Widowmaker Squad Mechanik and 3 Assistants 6 Winter Guard w/Sgt. 6 Ironfangs w/Sgt. 3 Man O'War w/Sgt. Probably not the most efficient or effective list, and woefully out of date (I don't think any of these figs are more recent than 2004), but it's what I've got (I also have a Vlad that I can sub in for Sorcha) Thanks in advance!
|
Guinness: for those who are men of the cloth and football fans, but not necessarily in that order.
I think the lesson here is the best way to enjoy GW's games is to not use any of their rules.--Crimson Devil |
|
|
|
2006/01/17 05:00:29
Subject: RE: What's a 'standard size' Army?
|
|
Been Around the Block
|
500 points is fairly standard, but then again, you can just decide to go to 600 points without a problem.
For larger games : You got more firepower, so units tend to die faster . So for me, those games dont last that much longer.
|
|
|
|
2006/01/17 05:19:35
Subject: RE: What's a 'standard size' Army?
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
Anymore the standard size would be 750 points to allow use of the epic warcasters.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
|
|
2006/01/17 06:20:50
Subject: RE: What's a 'standard size' Army?
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
500/750/1000
That is the usual game point breaks. But you can do whatever you like of course!
|
|
|
|
2006/01/17 07:35:09
Subject: RE: What's a 'standard size' Army?
|
|
Clousseau
|
so, should I bump my list up to 750? Any recommendations (I'd like to stay in Prime, if at all possible)?
|
Guinness: for those who are men of the cloth and football fans, but not necessarily in that order.
I think the lesson here is the best way to enjoy GW's games is to not use any of their rules.--Crimson Devil |
|
|
|
2006/01/17 08:43:54
Subject: RE: What's a 'standard size' Army?
|
|
[MOD]
Madrak Ironhide
|
Why do you want to stay in Prime?
|
|
|
|
|
2006/01/17 09:42:50
Subject: RE: What's a 'standard size' Army?
|
|
Clousseau
|
No particular reason, but mostly because that's the book I have, and until I get some more people interested locally, I don't feel like buying any of the other books (yet)
|
Guinness: for those who are men of the cloth and football fans, but not necessarily in that order.
I think the lesson here is the best way to enjoy GW's games is to not use any of their rules.--Crimson Devil |
|
|
|
2006/01/17 12:55:24
Subject: RE: What's a 'standard size' Army?
|
|
[MOD]
Madrak Ironhide
|
I don't think you have to buy the book yet, really. Just look at the unit card or ask for clarification on some of the expansion cards here and we could probably explain.
|
|
|
|
|
2006/01/17 16:57:22
Subject: RE: What's a 'standard size' Army?
|
|
Infiltrating Moblot
|
Get 2 x Destroyers and 2 x Mortars if you're planning on sticking with Sorcha. With arcing fire all four of these will pound the face of any warcaster into the ground once they've been icy gazed.
|
|
|
|
|
2006/01/17 16:59:12
Subject: RE: What's a 'standard size' Army?
|
|
Infiltrating Moblot
|
Oh, and a Kovnik for your 2 of your destroyers. Sorcha needs her focus.
|
|
|
|
|
2006/01/18 07:00:44
Subject: RE: What's a 'standard size' Army?
|
|
Clousseau
|
See, this is what I'm talking about. I have no idea what a kovnik (this is the man o' war kovnik?) does. And I'm assuming you're talking about getting rid of the juggy and putting in another Destroyer?
What about things like Greylords, Doom Reavers (who, iirc, were rather easily shot up), and the manhunter?
Mortars sound good, though. I'll look into that...
|
Guinness: for those who are men of the cloth and football fans, but not necessarily in that order.
I think the lesson here is the best way to enjoy GW's games is to not use any of their rules.--Crimson Devil |
|
|
|
2006/01/18 08:13:31
Subject: RE: What's a 'standard size' Army?
|
|
Fresh-Faced New User
|
My 500 point list is Sorcha, A devastator, A Juugernaught, A Kodiak (Escalation Jack) A Greylord Ternion, A full unit of Mechaniks and Reinholdt. You don't really need the Escalation Book if you by the Deck of Cards, it will provide all the necessary unit descriptions. As I raise my list I amgoing to get another Caster. As said Before Sorcha Needs her Focus and there is no real reason to have more than 3 jacks per Caster with Khador. If you added a Kodiak to your List you would be at 702, A greylord ternion would put you at 745 and give you more chances to Freeze your enemies solid.
|
|
|
|
2006/01/19 02:27:14
Subject: RE: What's a 'standard size' Army?
|
|
Infiltrating Moblot
|
Kovnik will Jack Marshall 2 of your destoyers to save you focus. THen you've only got a single Juggy for Sorcha to make run and a total of 5 arcing fire shots in the army with 2 Mortars. That's a LOT of hurt that can easily blast a warcaster to pieces once you icy gaze him.
|
|
|
|
|
2006/01/19 02:41:47
Subject: RE:What's a 'standard size' Army?
|
|
Been Around the Block
|
Yeah. I agree with the above. You do not need Escalation to play any of the units from them. Escalation is a great book and a great read but its not like trying to play 40k without the codex. All the rules you need are in Prime and your cards. (There is one page of extra rules in Escalation. The rest is fluff). So far I have played about 10 games all with 300 points. I love it and do not feel the need to have more. I do WANT more and have more, but not because the game needs it. Where you need to get more players in, just have them buy and play around that 300 point level. All my friends are 40k people and it is hard to convince them at first that 300 points is fun, but they see after they try it for a while. To me, I know we 40k players try to explain warmachine in 40k language, but WM really is just a different game, as you know, with the strategy and fun in faction and force choice, focus allocation, and pulling off cool moves. At least that is how it is for me. Have fun.
|
|
|
|
2006/01/19 05:31:09
Subject: RE: What's a 'standard size' Army?
|
|
Clousseau
|
I guess I'll just invest in the card set, then? I know, I must sound like a junkie on withdrawl ("I...I don't need the book? Um, so I should get just the book? Book?")
I reactivated my account at the Privateer Press forums and started hunting-and-pecking and playing around with lists. Looks like I'm going to try something like this at 750:
Sorscha Juggernaught Kovnik Destroyer Full IFP w/UA 8 WG + Sgt. 2 WG mortars Greylords Manhunter Eiyriss
Something like that. I'll save the MOW for a 500 point list or something.
|
Guinness: for those who are men of the cloth and football fans, but not necessarily in that order.
I think the lesson here is the best way to enjoy GW's games is to not use any of their rules.--Crimson Devil |
|
|
|
2006/01/19 10:31:06
Subject: RE: What's a 'standard size' Army?
|
|
[MOD]
Madrak Ironhide
|
I HATE assembling Man o Wars...Kovniks too.
|
|
|
|
|
2006/01/19 13:17:27
Subject: RE: What's a 'standard size' Army?
|
|
Fresh-Faced New User
St. Louis, MO.
|
Going back to the original post, I don't think the game becomes unwieldy at battles of up to 1,000 points. Since that's the largest size I regularly play (only done a couple 1500 point games), I won't comment beyond that level.
I think 500 point games are still the most common, although 750 is on the rise. I personally find 1,000 point games to be the most fun, but they do take about half again as long as a 500 pointer.
From what you've mentioned about your player community, I'd stick with the smaller format, unless you're planning on taking a road-trip. Doesn't do you much good to have 30 lbs of pewter if you're the only one playing.
Maybe instead start a second faction, so you can run demos, and get others interested?
|
Show yourself a brave man, as a Spartiate should; and do you, allies, follow him like men, and remember that zeal, honor, and obedience mark the good soldier.
Thucydides 5.9.9 |
|
|
|
2006/01/19 15:29:43
Subject: RE: What's a 'standard size' Army?
|
|
Clousseau
|
Malf--Yeah, I'm really not looking forward. I'm hoping the Kovnic's a little better on the hands, but someone just posted over at the PP site that it takes "at least 4 pins". Shudder.
Brasidas: good to know. I'm going to get to one of my LFGS and they're clearing out some Warmachine stuff, and I think they have either a lot of cygnar or mercs. Maybe I'll load up a small (300 pt) force or something...I'll probably do the same when I start confrontation (Griffons, Lions, Kelts...Elves...yeah).
On another note, anyone know a good alternative manhunter?
|
Guinness: for those who are men of the cloth and football fans, but not necessarily in that order.
I think the lesson here is the best way to enjoy GW's games is to not use any of their rules.--Crimson Devil |
|
|
|
2006/01/19 16:30:13
Subject: RE: What's a 'standard size' Army?
|
|
[MOD]
Madrak Ironhide
|
My friends hold together fine with glue sandwiches of either toilet paper+ krazy or greystuff + krazy, but they get kind of messy and visible. Also I DID pin the hands on those jerks, but drilled right through the tiny tiny hand of one so the pin is visible but he claims is fine because "it looks much cooler that way"
I think he's being nice.
|
|
|
|
|
2006/01/20 10:24:09
Subject: RE: What's a 'standard size' Army?
|
|
Clousseau
|
Malf: how was that supposed to make me feel better?
|
Guinness: for those who are men of the cloth and football fans, but not necessarily in that order.
I think the lesson here is the best way to enjoy GW's games is to not use any of their rules.--Crimson Devil |
|
|
|
2006/01/20 16:26:44
Subject: RE: What's a 'standard size' Army?
|
|
[MOD]
Madrak Ironhide
|
Oh, because watching me suffer makes you happy?
|
|
|
|
|
2006/01/21 07:16:24
Subject: RE: What's a 'standard size' Army?
|
|
Clousseau
|
Do you REALLY want me to answer that Actually, someone posted a nice MOW assembly method at Brushthralls: http://www.brushthralls.com/MOW/index.php I'll probably use that method, though greenstuff scares me.
|
Guinness: for those who are men of the cloth and football fans, but not necessarily in that order.
I think the lesson here is the best way to enjoy GW's games is to not use any of their rules.--Crimson Devil |
|
|
|
|