Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Hi people, I was just wondering if this was a good idea :

By using CSM Crimson Slaughter, I'd have access to cheaper marines with fear (and access to many marks), dirge casters (shame the KDK don't have access to those), obliterators, predators and havocs (long range weaponry that isn't accessible to KDK) and of course the famous daemonheart.

By then adding the KDK daemons, I'd have access to daemons with fearless instead of daemonic instability, Skull cannons (Nice anti-swarm), good melee possessed and of course bloodletters and Flesh hounds, which would then be able to benefit from dirge casters (and thus I would be able to strip DA and Tau from their daedly overwatch).

What do you think of it ?

Generally yeah it feels good.
You can also run Kharn, and a vehicle with the legacy of first war of Armageddon.
The trouble with two forces is troops tax.
Crimson slaughter+ gorepack feels good to me , minimum troops.

I love running an unmarked sorcer w/ daemonheart for a "Khorne sorcerer" (he promptly gets eaten by daemons after the game) for a little psyker action.