Drahazar1 wrote:First is the army of the dead any good and are they competitive.
If you want to strictly stick to the actual Army of the Dead, they are very limited. One infantry choice, one cavalry choice, and one (1) hero (the King of the Dead). This basically means you can't take more than 12 AoD warriors in an army (you need at least one Hero for every 12 Warriors). They are part of the larger
Fiefdoms list from the
Kingdoms of Men book, so you could take heroes from the other sub-factions (Dol Amroth, Lossarch, etc.) to lead a warband of Undead, although to me at least that seems rather at odds with the source material. Although not official I would consider using pre-King of Gondor Aragorn to lead an Undead Warband entirely reasonable.
Second the elephant riding guys how are they.
The Mumak (the elephant with howdah) is part of the
Harad and Umbar list from the
Fallen Realms book, which has a lot of choices. Several choice of both Infantry and Cavalry, melee and missile troops. Its certainly a very viable list.
Looking into the game and they interest me so dose the balrog and fell beasts
There are two named Righwraiths in the
Harad and Umbar list, which can both lead your warbands and ride fell beasts. You could also take one of the other named Ringwraiths (or an un-named Rightwraith) on fell beast, but they could not lead your warbands. You could also include the Balrog (you can combine any "evil" army with any other) although the generally consensus is that the Balrog isn't really worth his points.
Not sure how familiar you are with the rules, but as far as building armies, you can mix any "good" units together, or any "evil" units together (the only limit is not good/evil mixes). You do need to field one "hero" (a named character or a generic captain) for each 12 warriors and they all need to come from the same list. For example 12 Army of the Dead warriors plus the King of the Dead is one "warband". They can be fielded with (for example) 12 Rohan warriors plus a Captain of Rohan for a second warband.