Switch Theme:

Final salvo needs to go.  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Jealous that Horus is Warmaster



Boston

Hey all, and please forgive me in advance for the rant, but I have to say that after my experience at regionals this weekend, Fantasy Flight needs to come up with a better way of resolving draws than final salvo.

No disrespect to the guy who ultimately won the CT regionals (Brian of Battleground Games in Mass.) But he made the cut on a record that included two victories (including one against me) via final Salvo.

I really think that a draw - possibly including what used to be modified wins (and if so, i'd also include modified losses) - should get some points, but not the same as a clear victory. I know that mov accounts for some of that. But I think folks with a 4-1-1 record should rank a bit higher than actual 4-2.

If I had to design the way to rank swiss pairing, I'd probably set it so a win gets 4 points. A modified win gets 3, A draw 2, a "modified loss" 1 and a loss 0. ... or maybe 2 for a victory, 1 for a draw (including mov +/- 10 points, or 5) and zero for a loss. After that MOV settles different rankings with the same number of "record points".

The first version would set a clear disincentive to the intentional draw problem (except perhaps for two players with perfect records going into the final swiss round, but those folks would likely make the cut anyway). Most players in a tight tournament wouldn't be able to risk losing a relatively large number of "record points " going to the cut.

What do you think?
   
Made in us
Douglas Bader






Agreed. FFG just needs to accept that intentional draws are part of any tournament system with swiss + cut and go back to the previous rules.

There is no such thing as a hobby without politics. "Leave politics at the door" is itself a political statement, an endorsement of the status quo and an attempt to silence dissenting voices. 
   
 
Forum Index » Atomic Mass Games (Star Wars & Marvel: Crisis Protocol)
Go to: