(CNN)A recent astronomical observation of a "cold spot" in the universe is stirring the interest of scientists who are intrigued with an exciting and highly speculative theory that there may be more than one universe.

Now before you get incredibly excited about that prospect, I should caution that this particular explanation is a huge long shot and there are more prosaic possible explanations. The idea of multiple universes, or multiverses, is a highly speculative and contentious one, and many experts view it with a very jaundiced eye. (This includes me.) In 1964, two scientists used a microwave receiver to hear the radio hiss that is the modern remnant of the Big Bang. While the universe after the Big Bang was unimaginably hot, it has cooled over the eons and these measurements showed that the temperature of the universe is about 3 Kelvin (-455 ºF). Further, the temperature is extraordinarily uniform. However, in 1998, the COBE satellite discovered that the temperature of the universe wasn't perfectly homogeneous. There were places in the sky that were a little hotter and colder than average. These variations are very small, only about one part in 100,000.

There have been improved measurements of this non-uniformity, with the most recent satellite (called Planck) publishing its measurements in the early part of this decade. These new measurements are much more precise and they support the earlier conclusions of the COBE satellite. Scientists believe these small variations are actually remnants of subatomic-sized temperature differences that were present at the moment of the Big Bang that are now stretched across the entire universe. And, while that is inarguably an extremely cool idea, it's not the thing that has scientists' attention at the moment. There's another topic that is literally cooler still.

Our current theories can pretty much explain the pattern of cold and hot spots across the sky, except there appears to be an anomaly. There is a spot in the heavens that is unusually cold. Scientists have unimaginatively called it "The Cold Spot." At only 150 microkelvins below average, this seems like a very small variation. But it is a much bigger temperature difference and it covers a much larger part of the sky than can be easily explained. There is something unusual going on. In about 2008, several scientists proposed that this cold spot in the remnant of the Big Bang fireball could perhaps be due to collisions between multiverses. The Cold Spot could be nothing more than a bruise on a particularly large peach. This is obviously an exciting idea. The possibility of confirming multiverses would vastly overturn mankind's vision of our place in reality. Copernicus taught us that the Earth wasn't the center of the universe, while Hubble taught us that not only is the Sun not at the center of universe, the Sun is a simply an ordinary component of a larger galaxy that is but one of billions. Discovering that multiverses existed would tell us that not even our universe is special. The idea of human exceptionalism would take another blow.

Naturally scientists look critically at these grand ideas. Maybe there is a far more ordinary explanation for the Cold Spot. One such explanation of the Cold Spot is simply there that there is a void in the cosmos, which is to say a region of the universe with far fewer galaxies than usual. If true, as the primordial light from the Big Bang passes through this region, it loses energy and cools. This effect only occurs if the universe is expanding, but we know that it is, so the proposal is completely reasonable. A recent study announced on April 12 looked at this region of space to see if it really did have fewer galaxies than expected. The study suggests that there was a small deficit, but not nearly enough to explain the Cold Spot. In short, the obvious answer doesn't appear to be the right one.

So what does it all mean? Although I'd bet that the void idea is the right one, this is a bet I'd be happy to lose, because I would be lying if I didn't say that I would love to see someone prove that the Cold Spot was caused by colliding universes. However, it is a highly improbable outcome. It is far more likely that additional studies will support a more ordinary cause. But the prospect of observing multiverses is an exciting one, so scientists are guaranteed to keep looking at it. Figuring out what is going on will take a lot more research, and nobody can definitively tell you what the final outcome will be. In the words of the eternally wise Yogi Berra, "It's hard to make predictions, especially about the future."

 Tactical_Spam wrote:
We are really grasping at straws now aren't we?

 jasper76 wrote:

 Tactical_Spam wrote:
We are really grasping at straws now aren't we?

It's fun to speculate. This answer to the riddle of the unevenness of temperature in our universe would be more satisfying than the prevalent "quantum fluctuations in the singularity" magic wand...at least more satisfying to me.

 jmurph wrote:
I am a bit confused by the premise. Cold isn't a thing, rather it is a lack of thermal energy. Thermal energy requires the presence of a source, ergo a "cold spot" is just a lack of thermal sources. As the diagram indicates, there are areas of greater and lesser concentration. Is the "cold spot" any more mysterious than the areas of high thermal concentration? Indeed, if cosmic expansion is a thing, such areas should increase in probability.