Apologies if this has been discussed at length elsewhere which I've missed, but I’m looking for opinions on the wording of Chief Librarian Mephiston’s Lord of Death ability.
How would you interpret these two rules/abilities?
Assume your opponent has shot at your unit with a weapon that causes 3 Damage and passes their “to wound” roll.
Assume you’ve just failed your save.
1. Black Rage – “Roll a D6 every time this unit loses a wound. On a roll of 6 the damage is ignored”
To me, this seems fairly obvious that I would need to roll 3 6s to save my Death Company marine because the damage has to be applied before the unit “loses a wound”.
I would also assume that I’d roll a dice for every mortal wound allocated to the model.
2. Mephiston’s Lord of Death – Each time Mephiston suffers an unsaved wound or a mortal wound roll a D6. On a 5 or 6 the damage is ignored.”
This time the wording is slightly different.
Is there any merit in the argument that, in this case, one roll of 5 or 6 would ignore
any damage caused by the weapon?
I’m unsure as to why it wouldn’t be worded similarly to Black Rage, i.e. “Roll a
D6 every time Mephiston loses a wound.”
Is there a difference between “losing a wound” and “suffering an unsaved wound”?
Do you “suffer an unsaved wound” when you fail your saving throw (before damage is applied)? Or does “suffer an unsaved wound” mean exactly the same as “lose a wound”?
Honestly, I feel like I’m being a bit pedantic asking this type of question. I’m very much a “Rules as Intended” kinda guy, but I honestly am unsure of what the intention is with Mephiston’s ability.
I’d be interested to hear if there is a consensus of interpretations here.
I haven’t been through all the indices, so I’m sure there are other similar examples (Disgustingly Resilient, for example, seems straightforward being worded the same as Black Rage – “loses a wound”)
At the moment though, I don’t know what to do with Mephiston.
Thanks for any input