Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
|
2017/08/25 16:01:36
Subject: Question about Circle armies
|
|
Nurgle Predator Driver with an Infestation
|
So I am still on the fence about WarmaHordes. The faction that has really caught my attention is Circle with all their celtic stone golems. However my question is about the compesition of Circle armies. Is it possible to have an army made soley up of these things or do I have to include the wild beast looking characters.
|
TOO MUCH CHAOS!!!
|
|
|
|
2017/08/26 02:56:09
Subject: Question about Circle armies
|
|
Thinking of Joining a Davinite Loge
|
Absolutely-obviously, you'll still need a warcaster, and probably some support, but all the casters can take nothing but Constructs.
This guy:
http://battlecollege.org/index.php/Bradigus_Thorle_the_Runecarver
is actually allowed to take nothing else.
|
My $0.02, which since 1992 has rounded to nothing. Take with salt.
Elysian Drop Troops, Dark Angels, 30K
Mercenaries, Retribution
Ten Thunders, Neverborn
|
|
|
|
2017/08/26 11:51:11
Subject: Question about Circle armies
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Nurgle wrote:So I am still on the fence about WarmaHordes. The faction that has really caught my attention is Circle with all their celtic stone golems. However my question is about the compesition of Circle armies. Is it possible to have an army made soley up of these things or do I have to include the wild beast looking characters.
Well, with the understanding that you need a warlock first and foremost, who won't be a Celtic stone golem, the answer is yes.
The composition of the armed forces of the circle is quite varied. You have the various Druid elements, who make up the leadership 'caste', a lot of the solos and unit leader types. The warbeasts they can bring to the title include living warbeasts like warp wolves, griffons, satyrs and the stone golems. Circle warlocks in the fluff are often drawn to either living or stone warbeasts, but when it comes to the game you can take what you want, with the exception of beadigus who can only take the stone golems. Heck, the circle gargantuan is a giant stone golem.
Beyond that, it's not just stone warbeasts. The 'boots on the ground' that they can bring comprise the 'wolves of orboros', who are various humans who serve the druids, often as heavy infantry. You have the Tharn who are feral, cannibal beastmen who serve as shock infantry, skirmishers and terror troops. You also have the Druid constructs, which are too small to be warbeasts- things like wold stalkers whichare small stone shrimp shaped things that serve as ranged support, and sentry stones and things like that.
There is no reason you can't build an army around a warlock(probably the best wold-leaning warlocks are bradigus and baldur), leading a war pack of stone golems and with support from other druids and stone constructs, and aside from the warlock and maybe some Druid solos and unit leaders, have nothing but stone constructs in your army.
Hope that helps.
|
greatest band in the universe: machine supremacy
"Punch your fist in the air and hold your Gameboy aloft like the warrior you are" |
|
|
|
2017/08/26 23:16:33
Subject: Question about Circle armies
|
|
Second Story Man
|
Baldur also runs the golems really well (the only one who did before Bradigus).
Don't forget the shrimp unit is available as part of the "boots on the ground". I don't know how good they are, though.
|
Are you a Wolf, a Sheep, or a Hound?
Megavolt wrote:They called me crazy…they called me insane…THEY CALLED ME LOONEY!! and boy, were they right. |
|
|
|
2017/08/30 09:21:31
Subject: Re:Question about Circle armies
|
|
Executing Exarch
|
Besides your Warlock (the army commander) you can pretty much build an army of grumpy rock golems
You might have a couple of issues with Fury management, as nearly every action a Warbeast/Construct takes generates Fury, which in turn feedsback into your Warlock the following turn to power their spells, which cost Fury rather than generate.
However Warlocks have a limit on how much Fury they can hold, if you can't transfer all the Fury there is a chance of loosing control of the model, in the Constructs case they generally just shut down.
Also in missions only some types of models can hold/control some objectives or areas so some troops are needed (for Circle the best picks are Reeves (crossbow dudes), Wolves (Pikemen) and Bloodtrackers (skirmishy javelin/stabby sorts)
|
"AND YET YOU ACT AS IF THERE IS SOME IDEAL ORDER IN THE WORLD, AS IF THERE IS SOME...SOME RIGHTNESS IN THE UNIVERSE BY WHICH IT MAY BE JUDGED." |
|
|
|
2017/09/05 01:49:05
Subject: Re:Question about Circle armies
|
|
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
Turnip Jedi wrote:
However Warlocks have a limit on how much Fury they can hold, if you can't transfer all the Fury there is a chance of loosing control of the model, in the Constructs case they generally just shut down.
Actually the Wolds just don't frenzy. Which is both good and bad. If they're full they can't do anything that requires Fury, but they still get their initial attacks. And Circle has a lot of options to remove fury other than the warlock.
Shifting stones and the Stoneshapers are good support.
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
|
|
2017/09/12 07:00:08
Subject: Question about Circle armies
|
|
Infiltrating Broodlord
|
Having the Wold go where you want and punch what you want is a big plus in my book.
|
|
|
|
|
2017/09/16 16:07:09
Subject: Question about Circle armies
|
|
Highlord with a Blackstone Fortress
Adrift within the vortex of my imagination.
|
I think that is the beauty of Circle options, warpwolves go off the deep end easily, golems never do, take both and tag team to get the amount of crazy you want when you want it. It helps that one is offense focused the other defence, use Circles superior mobility to take advantage and time fights for your benefit.
Its a powerful toolbox, but relatively hard to pull off in practice. All in all you are better off with Cryx for this type of game.
|
n'oublie jamais - It appears I now have to highlight this again.
It is by tea alone I set my mind in motion. By the juice of the brew my thoughts aquire speed, my mind becomes strained, the strain becomes a warning. It is by tea alone I set my mind in motion. |
|
|
|
|