Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
|
2017/11/17 09:28:38
Subject: Does a Thornback have to pay for its chitin thorns?
|
|
Hungry Little Ripper
|
The tyranid codex point cost section says "does not include weapons" whereas other codices/indices say "weapons or wargear". The chitin thorns biomorph, which isn't a weapon, comes stock on Thornbacks. My question is if the price of a Thornback includes the chitin thorns? Based on other codices I'd say no, but since the tyranid codex ommits the wargear part it makes me believe it's intentional.
|
|
|
|
2017/11/17 09:31:40
Subject: Does a Thornback have to pay for its chitin thorns?
|
|
Norn Queen
|
Nighttail wrote:The tyranid codex point cost section says "does not include weapons" whereas other codices/indices say "weapons or wargear". The chitin thorns biomorph, which isn't a weapon, comes stock on Thornbacks. My question is if the price of a Thornback includes the chitin thorns? Based on other codices I'd say no, but since the tyranid codex ommits the wargear part it makes me believe it's intentional.
You're missing the top of the page "Simply add together the points values of all your models, as well as the weapons and biomorphs they are equipped
with, to determine your army’s total points value."
You pay for the biomorphs.
|
|
|
|
2017/11/17 09:56:12
Subject: Does a Thornback have to pay for its chitin thorns?
|
|
Hungry Little Ripper
|
I did indeed miss that part. I do still find it peculiar that the Tyranid codex is the only entry so far where it specifically only says weapons though, and not weapons and wargear. This would only affect the Thornback since it's the only unit, to my knowledge, that comes stock with a non-weapon biomorph upgrade. But you're correct. I guess the Thornback and Screamer-killer will continue to be overshadowed by regular Carnifexes.
|
|
|
|
2017/11/17 10:02:15
Subject: Does a Thornback have to pay for its chitin thorns?
|
|
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
They're only pre-packed versions of Carnifexes with set loadouts after all. Shouldn't expect price differences.
|
Stormonu wrote:For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules" |
|
|
|
2017/11/17 10:03:53
Subject: Does a Thornback have to pay for its chitin thorns?
|
|
Norn Queen
|
Nighttail wrote:I did indeed miss that part. I do still find it peculiar that the Tyranid codex is the only entry so far where it specifically only says weapons though, and not weapons and wargear. This would only affect the Thornback since it's the only unit, to my knowledge, that comes stock with a non-weapon biomorph upgrade. But you're correct. I guess the Thornback and Screamer-killer will continue to be overshadowed by regular Carnifexes.
Because "wargear" isn't a tyrannidy word I guess.
Also don't Thornbacks and Screamer-killers get some advantages over normal carnifexes? I thought SK's got a better bioplasma
|
|
|
|
2017/11/17 10:11:50
Subject: Does a Thornback have to pay for its chitin thorns?
|
|
Hungry Little Ripper
|
BaconCatBug wrote:
Also don't Thornbacks and Screamer-killers get some advantages over normal carnifexes? I thought SK's got a better bioplasma
SKs get better bioplasma and +1 to all morale rolls for enemies within 8". Problem is the plasma being D6 shots on a model with BS4+, and since the SK is a melee monster you're most likely advancing each turn meaning you're hitting on 5s with D6 shots. It also costs 23 points more than a regular Carnifex. The Thornback ignores cover against infantry, but in return has extremely limited wargear options and is 3 points more expensive over a regular Carnifex.
|
|
|
|
2017/11/17 11:10:13
Subject: Does a Thornback have to pay for its chitin thorns?
|
|
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
The +1 to hit when the SK charges means it will make tasty tasty mincemeat out of units, regardless of the biosplasna hitting. And at no chance of dying 6 shots and AP-4 it's a nice spray-and-pray bonus!
|
Stormonu wrote:For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules" |
|
|
|
2017/11/20 19:51:04
Subject: Does a Thornback have to pay for its chitin thorns?
|
|
Witch Hunter in the Shadows
Aachen
|
JohnnyHell wrote:The +1 to hit when the SK charges means it will make tasty tasty mincemeat out of units, regardless of the biosplasna hitting. And at no chance of dying 6 shots and AP-4 it's a nice spray-and-pray bonus!
Yeah, that's way better than the +1 to Hit a Carnifex gets on a charge.
|
|
|
|
|