Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
I get what they are trying to do with Alita and maybe over the course of the film it will be something you get used to. But in the trailer it just looks freaky. Really the arms would have been more than enough to show she's a cyborg/android. No need to CGI all over the actresses face.
Yeah I have to agree that's what annoys me the most. Also she's the only chararacter they've done it too (barring the full cyborgs) which leaves one feeling that they've just cherry picked her face out of all the faces to mess with. Time will tell if it works and over a whole film it might work, but if her eyes bugged-out any more they'd pop out. Also didn't the anime manage quite alright without going into silly bug-eyes.
I am really looking forward to this! Battle Angel Alita was weirdly one of the first animes I owned when I picked it up as a random VHS tape from a Blockbuster sale as they updated to DVD. Alita looks suitably scary, even in the face of monstrous combat cyborgs.
Klawz-Ramming is a subset of citrus fruit?
Gwar- "And everyone wants a bigger Spleen!"
Mercurial wrote:
I admire your aplomb and instate you as Baron of the Seas and Lord Marshall of Privateers.
Orkeosaurus wrote:Star Trek also said we'd have X-Wings by now. We all see how that prediction turned out.
Orkeosaurus, on homophobia, the nature of homosexuality, and the greatness of George Takei.
English doesn't borrow from other languages. It follows them down dark alleyways and mugs them for loose grammar.
Those eyes are outright annoying. I liked the old animated movie and the other visual elements look pretty cool but I'll pass just on the basis of those eyes. I could barely watch the trailer, I wouldn't be able to stand looking at that for more than a few minutes let alone full movie.
Bah. If I want to watch BA Alita I'd go do that. This is a weird mess, both visually and thematically. And as introductions to the characters, very off putting.
Someone tell hollywood that certain mediums simply do a better job at certain stories, and trying to replicate them doesn't work.
It kind of reminds me of one of those cartoon live action mashups like who framed Roger rabbit.
Is it really so bad that its unwatchable? I personally don't think so and would like to see it.
"Through the darkness of future past, the magician longs to see.
One chants out between two worlds: Fire, walk with me." - Twin Peaks
"You listen to me. While I will admit to a certain cynicism, the fact is that I am a naysayer and hatchetman in the fight against violence. I pride myself in taking a punch and I'll gladly take another because I choose to live my life in the company of Gandhi and King. My concerns are global. I reject absolutely revenge, aggression, and retaliation. The foundation of such a method... is love. I love you Sheriff Truman." - Twin Peaks
They're trying to emphasize how inhuman Alita actually is with the oversize eyes. The only organic part of her is a brain, so her appearance isn't constrained by human biology. It's a really bold choice IMO, and it may backfire on them, but I think it's having the intended effect. They went full CGI on her anyways, so uncanny valley was going to be unavoidable.
What the trailer really needed, though, was some of that sweet rocket hammer action. And no Tiphares tattoo on Doc Ido's forehead (though there seems to be one on another character)?
John Prins wrote: They're trying to emphasize how inhuman Alita actually is with the oversize eyes.
Which is why it's the wrong approach. The oversized eyes on cartoon and anime characters has been a thing for decades- it isn't there for inhumanity, it's there for cuteness, to make the characters more appealing in a puppy or kitten sort of way. It sometimes doesn't work (and in this case gels badly with the plasticity of the cgi work), but the response such things are suppose to evoke is 'want hugs' not 'kill it with fire'
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/12/09 17:03:04
John Prins wrote: They're trying to emphasize how inhuman Alita actually is with the oversize eyes.
Which is why it's the wrong approach. The oversized eyes on cartoon and anime characters has been a thing for decades- it isn't there for inhumanity, it's there for cuteness, to make the characters more appealing in a puppy or kitten sort of way. It sometimes doesn't work (and in this case gels badly with the plasticity of the cgi work), but the response such things are suppose to evoke is 'want hugs' not 'kill it with fire'
I said bold, I didn't say correct. The correct approach would have been to not do a live action movie in the first place, but a high quality traditionally animated one. But they're trying for something here, and they're not being subtle about it. Heck, the lead asks "Can you accept me even though I'm not completely human?" They want it to be polarizing.
John Prins wrote: They're trying to emphasize how inhuman Alita actually is with the oversize eyes.
Which is why it's the wrong approach. The oversized eyes on cartoon and anime characters has been a thing for decades- it isn't there for inhumanity, it's there for cuteness, to make the characters more appealing in a puppy or kitten sort of way. It sometimes doesn't work (and in this case gels badly with the plasticity of the cgi work), but the response such things are suppose to evoke is 'want hugs' not 'kill it with fire'
This.
It's also because "the eyes are the window to the soul" and realistic sized eyes are difficult to see in manga panels. We easily accept cartoon exaggeration in cartoons, but not in almost life-like artworks -- hence the uncanny valley.
Exaggeration also works from the Manga's (which many anime are based off) as it helps to tell different characters apart from each other with the general simplistic style that many manga use. That's why you often get those insane hairstyles as well
As for animation, Hollywood has decided that animation isn't "serious". Traditional drawn animation is for kids only, even the same style done on digital is for kids only. The only hang on animation has is as things like Southpark - ergo "super adult" that they'd not get away with for kids - that and the Simpsons.
Pixar and such manage to hold out with all CGI animated movies, but they are again "kids/family".
It's a huge shame as the 80-90s had some really great animations and films produced by groups like Studio Ghibli continue to show that they can have an adult appeal. It's a shame, I really wish the USA would follow the French more so and take up animation in a more serious way (heck even in comics the artistic quality, detail and style is often superior in a lot of French based ones)
Those eyes creep me out. No way I am watching that, even with Waltz.
-"Wait a minute.....who is that Frazz is talking to in the gallery? Hmmm something is going on here.....Oh.... it seems there is some dispute over video taping of some sort......Frazz is really upset now..........wait a minute......whats he go there.......is it? Can it be?....Frazz has just unleashed his hidden weiner dog from his mini bag, while quoting shakespeares "Let slip the dogs the war!!" GG
-"Don't mind Frazzled. He's just Dakka's crazy old dude locked in the attic. He's harmless. Mostly."
-TBone the Magnificent 1999-2014, Long Live the King!
usernamesareannoying wrote: It kind of reminds me of one of those cartoon live action mashups like who framed Roger rabbit.
Is it really so bad that its unwatchable? I personally don't think so and would like to see it.
I don't think the audience would have sat through Roger Rabbit if the main character had been Judge Doom and had him staring everyone down the entire film. Roger Rabbit woks because it's meant to be a cartoonish world intermixed with reality, not a serious genre. Even within the cartoon setting Judge Doom was a bit of a stretch.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/12/09 17:53:26
I don't watch animoo so whether it's a genre convention or not and for what reason doesn't really matter to me - I don't see the issue? I don't have any desire to see the film - I'm not really the target audience for films about young girls discovering their inner power or whatever they're going for, though it's good that they're making more such films and that more of them are "genre" affairs with a setting other than Mopey-Emo Urban Fantasy - but if it's a story about a brain in a totally robotic body, why not emphasise the artificial nature of that body with full-on uncanny valley facial design.
"Your society's broken, so who should we blame? Should we blame the rich, powerful people who caused it? No, lets blame the people with no power and no money and those immigrants who don't even have the vote. Yea, it must be their fething fault." - Iain M Banks
-----
"The language of modern British politics is meant to sound benign. But words do not mean what they seem to mean. 'Reform' actually means 'cut' or 'end'. 'Flexibility' really means 'exploit'. 'Prudence' really means 'don't invest'. And 'efficient'? That means whatever you want it to mean, usually 'cut'. All really mean 'keep wages low for the masses, taxes low for the rich, profits high for the corporations, and accept the decline in public services and amenities this will cause'." - Robin McAlpine from Common Weal
BobtheInquisitor wrote: Frightened Hamster Alita. Her eyes are the only part of the trailer that isn't painfully generic.
That's because the manga is over 20 years old. You're probably used to modern manga that have drawn on the production design of Alita.
The large eyes, though, have been typical of Japanese manga since the 1960s.
I am more familiar with older Manga, not that I went in much past Dragonball. Sure, at the time what's now old was new, but knowing that something used to be groundbreaking didn't save John Carter. Perhaps if they put an actual character or plot hook into the trailer it wouldn't feel so much like Ghost in the Shell in the uninspired live action disapointment genre.
The original was one of those things I liked when anime was rare enough that it was pretty much all awesome. It's definitely not held up but the core ideas are strong enough that there's potential in a remake. The eyes are weird when the trailer over emphasizes them, but they're less odd later when they get to the action. I'm curious, not all in or out either way.
I bought a couple of issues of it when first released, but I never got into it from the start, and that meant I never had the full set as I didn't try to collect it.
I liked the trailer better the second time.
It's interesting to contrast the uncanny valley of Battle Angel Alita with Paddington.
The eyes are a bit overdone, to the point of distraction, given that nobody else has anime eyes. I can forgive Gally's eyes if the Gunnm story and ethos is otherwise adapted faithfully. Given how long this has been in development, I hope so.