Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Does the new Munitorum Varnish actually work? I know that GW has had "issues" with the Purity Seal for a while, but this was supposedly a new formula that "works" Has anyone used it and had success? I'm looking for a nice seal for my gaming models and this was my first thought, I haven't really researched any others.

I don't own an airbrush so a can is my current thought process, and I figured if this is their new stuff, it should be better...right?

Thank You all in advance.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
If anyone has any sealers they would recommend, even if it's not the GW ones, I'm all ears...Please!

Thanks.

I'm really curious about this as well. The old Purity Seal is garbage, so tbh there's a lot of room for improvement.

I've struggled to find any good reviews of the Munitorum Varnish, and the majority of search results are online shops, with no customer reviews. I've found this though:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Warhammer40k/comments/7hgdw5/do_you_varnish/

So it seems the M. Varnish has a satin gloss, and as I would have preferred a matte look, I think I'll continue to use Vallejo.

Thank you for the reply, that reddit post at least shed a bit of light on the subject.

Again, thanks.