Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

First of all, hello!

Secondly, lets move straight to the point. In my humble opinion, a Triarch Stalker should be forced to use some adequate base. It would make measuring distances much easier and your opponent wouldn't need to struggle with removing casualties from below of its legs & forelimbs. It would also make it more clear to determine the total zone of influence and the exact number of models that could be assaulted&hit by the Stalker. As well as, it would make it easier for hostile models to proceed into direct engagement.

What do you folk think?

Cheers!

Agreed on game play stand point. Disagree on the basis of coolness.

It would be nice, but it follows the same rules as a rhino or land raider. It has no base, so you measure to the model. I don't understand the difficulty.

 Lance845 wrote:
It would be nice, but it follows the same rules as a rhino or land raider. It has no base, so you measure to the model. I don't understand the difficulty.

Consistency is the key here IMO. Boxy vehicles are easier to measure to/from by far. Providing it a base like the dunecrawler would be pretty neat.

Is it easier? You measure to and from all the guns and sponsons sticking out of the boxes. You also measure to and from whatever leg is closest. Its pretty easy to me.