Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
|
2018/03/17 20:46:28
Subject: New "Hover Tank" rule, do you think the March Errata will backdate it?
|
|
Norn Queen
|
For those unaware, the new T'au codex has changed the "Hover Tank" rule found on skimmers.
It now reads: Hover Tank: Instead of measuring distances to and from this model’s base, measure to and from this model’s hull or base (whichever is closer).
Where it used to read Hover Tank: Distance and ranges are always measured to and from this model’s hull, even though it has a base.
So because of GW's genius idea to not make special rules universal, we now have two rules with the same name but different effects.
Do you think GW is going to errata all the previous instances, and if not, does it matter?
|
|
|
|
2018/03/17 21:05:52
Subject: Re:New "Hover Tank" rule, do you think the March Errata will backdate it?
|
|
Infiltrating Broodlord
|
GW.... consistent....
LOL
|
Ayn Rand "We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality" |
|
|
|
2018/03/17 21:12:38
Subject: New "Hover Tank" rule, do you think the March Errata will backdate it?
|
|
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
What tanks exactly does this affect? Unless by extension GW has also confirmed that you can put models on whatever base you like.
All the Tau tanks were previously on 60mm flying bases, All of which were smaller than the tank.
Same goes for Eldar
Only on I can see it affecting if it changes is the new SM Primaris one.
|
Games Workshop Delenda Est.
Users on ignore- 53.
If you break apart my or anyone else's posts line by line I will not read them. |
|
|
|
2018/03/17 21:13:44
Subject: New "Hover Tank" rule, do you think the March Errata will backdate it?
|
|
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
Vigo. Spain.
|
The model hulls is always closer in this kind of models so it is not a problem really.
|
Crimson Devil wrote:
Dakka does have White Knights and is also rather infamous for it's Black Knights. A new edition brings out the passionate and not all of them are good at expressing themselves in written form. There have been plenty of hysterical responses from both sides so far. So we descend into pointless bickering with neither side listening to each other. So posting here becomes more masturbation than conversation.
ERJAK wrote:Forcing a 40k player to keep playing 7th is basically a hate crime.
|
|
|
|
2018/03/17 21:15:06
Subject: New "Hover Tank" rule, do you think the March Errata will backdate it?
|
|
Battlefortress Driver with Krusha Wheel
|
Grimtuff wrote:What tanks exactly does this affect? Unless by extension GW has also confirmed that you can put models on whatever base you like.
All the Tau tanks were previously on 60mm flying bases, All of which were smaller than the tank.
Same goes for Eldar
Only on I can see it affecting if it changes is the new SM Primaris one.
You know what some WAAC players are like... they probably got a 4X4 foot table and said that was their hover tanks base. XD
|
|
|
|
2018/03/17 21:16:51
Subject: New "Hover Tank" rule, do you think the March Errata will backdate it?
|
|
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
|
Explodes is already a rule with multiple versions but the same name.
As for Hover Tank that's the version they gave me on the Custodes skimmers, so I expect they'll be giving that to other tanks as we move on.
|
|
|
|
|
2018/03/17 22:16:51
Subject: New "Hover Tank" rule, do you think the March Errata will backdate it?
|
|
The Marine Standing Behind Marneus Calgar
|
If the tank was perched on something tall, the base could be closer then the hull to someone shooting from below. Or charging.
But we’re talking corner cases here.
|
|
|
|
|
2018/03/17 22:30:30
Subject: New "Hover Tank" rule, do you think the March Errata will backdate it?
|
|
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
lolman1c wrote: Grimtuff wrote:What tanks exactly does this affect? Unless by extension GW has also confirmed that you can put models on whatever base you like.
All the Tau tanks were previously on 60mm flying bases, All of which were smaller than the tank.
Same goes for Eldar
Only on I can see it affecting if it changes is the new SM Primaris one.
You know what some WAAC players are like... they probably got a 4X4 foot table and said that was their hover tanks base. XD
Dude, if you didn't mount your Wave Serpents to a yardstick you aren't even trying.
|
|
|
|
2018/03/18 02:16:09
Subject: New "Hover Tank" rule, do you think the March Errata will backdate it?
|
|
Krazed Killa Kan
|
And somehow having multiple variations of the same rule is better than having rules like these in the core rule book?
Also who puts their Tau Devilfish/Hammerheads/Skyrays on a skimmer base anyways? Those clear bases are a stiff breeze away from the stand snapping off at the end. Fortunately Tau tanks have those nifty landing gears so you can forgo the base entirely.
|
"Hold my shoota, I'm goin in"
Armies (7th edition points)
7000+ Points Death Skullz
4000 Points
+ + 3000 Points "The Fiery Heart of the Emperor"
3500 Points "Void Kraken" Space Marines
3000 Points "Bard's Booze Cruise" |
|
|
|
2018/03/18 02:23:24
Subject: New "Hover Tank" rule, do you think the March Errata will backdate it?
|
|
Norn Queen
|
I just realised why they (might) have done it, to stop the overly tall flight sticks making it impossible to hit the tank in the Fight Phase.
Which I immediately realise doesn't actually help because the physical model will still put you more than 1" from the base and Hull.
|
|
|
|
2018/03/18 16:47:40
Subject: New "Hover Tank" rule, do you think the March Errata will backdate it?
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I never understood why skimmers such as land speeders don't have this rule
|
|
|
|
|
2018/03/18 18:20:58
Subject: New "Hover Tank" rule, do you think the March Errata will backdate it?
|
|
Trustworthy Shas'vre
|
would putting them on an elevated oval flyer base be considered modeling for advantage, since TLOS works both ways?
|
'No plan survives contact with the enemy. Who are we?'
'THE ENEMY!!!'
|
|
|
|
|