Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Wanted to share an attempt I made at making a character for Renegade Militia. I used the process described in CA18 and applied it to a Renegade Enforcer. I haven't made a fleshed out backstory for him yet, was more set on getting a balanced concept out first. Let me know what you think!

The concept here is a leader who fights at the front with the cowardly masses, knows how to survive, and can scare anyone attempting to fall back into charging again.

Name: Hakkon, Draconian Rabble Master

M: 6"
WS: 3
BS: 3
S: 3
T: 3
W: 4
A: 3
Ld: *
Sv: 4+ (improved by "Toughened Armor")

Weapons:
• Power Maul
• Shotgun

- Uncertain Worth
- Fanatic
- Baleful Judge
- Refractor Field (4+ Invulnerable, improved by "Divine Protection")

Bonuses Added:
- Toughened Armor (+1 Sv)
- Divine Protection (+1 Invulnerable)
- Reactive Tactics (He can, along with friendly units within 6" of him, charge in a turn in which he fell back)
- Hard to Kill (Recovers one wound per turn)

Hakkon is proably a bad name given "Hakkon world claimer" but seems alright otherwise

Ah, I'm terrible with names so I went with a name from MtG

So basically a bigger meaner enforcer.

Yeah pretty much. I'm just tired of not being able to have a named character in my army so I thought I would try something out. My friends won't let me use the codex we all came up with, but perhaps they would let me get away with having something like this.

DeathKorp_Rider wrote:
Yeah pretty much. I'm just tired of not being able to have a named character in my army so I thought I would try something out. My friends won't let me use the codex we all came up with, but perhaps they would let me get away with having something like this.

Doubt it, any reason at all why they wouldn't let the codex beeing used, or just no official document?

The only explaination I got was "if our units have to suck then so do yours"

DeathKorp_Rider wrote:
The only explaination I got was "if our units have to suck then so do yours"

?!? Wow, great and what are their used armies?

Custodes

DeathKorp_Rider wrote:
Custodes

O rly, hahhhahhhahahhha, custodes suck, good to know,


Edit, next time you fight em, bring a horde with enforcer support.

After you crushed them under bubble wrap, you then tell them that that wouldn't have happened with the other codex.