Switch Theme:

Starategic gamble scenario question  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in fi
Locked in the Tower of Amareo





Scenario from ca2018. If you discard 2 cards for new and score by end of this turn they get double vp. Just quick clarification. Defend x etc that takes 2 turns can't score double right? Pretty sure but just checking

2024 painted/bought: 109/109 
   
Made in gb
Norn Queen






tneva82 wrote:
Scenario from ca2018. If you discard 2 cards for new and score by end of this turn they get double vp. Just quick clarification. Defend x etc that takes 2 turns can't score double right? Pretty sure but just checking
Correct, you cannot possibly have controlled an objective for two turns (while the objective is active) at the end of the same turn you generated the Defend X objective.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2019/05/18 16:12:25


 
   
Made in de
Death-Dealing Dark Angels Devastator






Seems we did that wrong then. I our group it we let it count if you already controlled that objective the last turn.

   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: